Re: [Devil-linux-develop] fedora core 2

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

> >> > I'm running SuSE 9.1 (2.6 kernel based), and haven't had any problems
> >> > compiling a 2.4 DL, but I haven't tried compiling a 2.6 DL.
> >>
> >> It's probably worth a try with SuSE 9.1.
> >
> > I can run a 2.6 compile on SuSE 9.1 and see what happens.  What should,
> > or shouldn't I select in menuconfig?  Is there a profile for 2.6?
> 
> No need for this, but thanks anyway.
> The 2.6 compile is not stable yet, I actually had on my list for this week
> to fix most of the problems there.
> But as I mentioned, the 2.4 compile *must* work...

I haven't had any problems compiling 2.4 DL on SuSE 9.1.  I haven't 
run a full compile for a couple weeks, but I plan on running a full
mrproper/new-lfs soon for a new DL box I need to install.

I can let you know how it goes ...

> I'm currently downloading the personal edition of suse 9.1, this is enough
> to do some testing.

All the RPM's are available for SuSE 9.1 professional.  You can do an
install of professional over the internet.  Or, I've heard that you can
install the personal edition and then download/install the professional
RPM's if needed.

 - BS