|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-03-23 00:56:19
|
Diego Torres wrote: > On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 05:33:27PM -0500, Bruce Smith wrote: > >>>>>wow!! we need it :) >>>> >>>>So you volunteer to include it ? >>> >>>bruce was first :) >> >>I was only asking about it! :-) >> >>I don't think we need both. Should we replace memtest86 with memtest+? >>I could probably do it ... > > > i think that memtest+ is superior to memtest86, so... i say yes :) Why not, let's give it a try. You could even make it selectable, which one should be included. Heiko |