Re: [Devil-linux-develop] [ devil-linux-Bugs-883926 ] openh323 doesn't compile under kernel 2.6

[Oliver J. <oli...@mo...>]

as i know, its only a compilation problem... debian and others
install separate header packages only for this case...

the kernel developers write very nice notes about using direct the 
kernel includes... 


i would tag the 2.6 as testing, and write a big compile note when
compiling with 2.6 and using the 2.4 includes... 

function old_kernel_includes () {
        OLDINCLUDEDIR=$(find_src_dir 2.4.21-include)
	if [ "CONFIG_KERNEL_VERSION" == "2.6" ]; then
          echo "HEY DUDE, PLEASE NOTE ..... YOU COMPILE FOR KERNEL 2.6"
	  echo "AND USE OLD INCLUDES FROM 2.4 BECAUSE THE PACKAGE ISNT"
          echo "COMPILE-READY FOR 2.6"	
	fi
        ln -nsf $OLDINCLUDEDIR/linux /usr/include/linux || exit 1
        ln -nsf $OLDINCLUDEDIR/asm-i386 /usr/include/asm || exit 1
        ln -nsf $OLDINCLUDEDIR/asm-generic /usr/include/asm-generic ||
exit 1
}
 


but perhaps, the new openh323 release is already prepared ??? 



On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 16:25, Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> Oliver Jehle wrote:
> > same problem as with pwlib... including the 2.4 headers for compile
> > works ..
> > 
> > they split the mach headers in 2.6 for the different i386
> > architectures.. think openh323 project need to fix this, if they
> > use the wrong set of includes for 2.6 ...
> 
> Using the old headers, doesn't this mean that the application won't work 
> anyway ?
> Shouldn't we rather disable it for now?
> 
> Heiko
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop