|
From: Emmanuel E. <ee...@ma...> - 2004-01-31 03:25:43
|
Hi, Bruce Smith a =E9crit: >>>same problem as with pwlib... including the 2.4 headers for compile >>>works .. >>> >>>they split the mach headers in 2.6 for the different i386 >>>architectures.. think openh323 project need to fix this, if they >>>use the wrong set of includes for 2.6 ... >> >>Using the old headers, doesn't this mean that the application won't wor= k=20 >>anyway ? >=20 >=20 > I honestly have no idea, I never tried it. >=20 > I originally added it for someone else, who has never used it either. >=20 >=20 >>Shouldn't we rather disable it for now? >=20 >=20 > Yes. >=20 > As far as I'm concerned, we can nuke the whole thing. It takes=20 > for f'n ever to compile, and I usually deselect it anyway! :-) >=20 Maybe not Nuke it ... just leave it for the time it needs to be updated .= .. IMO, it's not a bad thing to have h323 gateway on a communication box ... MaNU > - BS >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop |