|
From: Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...> - 2004-01-16 13:38:10
|
Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale wrote on 16.01.2004 10:22 MET: > Friedrich Lobenstock <fl...@fl...> writes: > >>Do you think it makes sense when the user does set IPV6ROUTE but >>not IPV6ADDR? If not then please rewrite this section. > > It can make sense, as link-local IPv6 addresses are allocated > implicitely. Ok, I don't know that much about the details of configuring IPv6, that's why I asked. >>And one last thing please make this TWO separate PATCHES, one for >>IPV6 support and one for bonding. >> >>The smaller the changes the better they can be checked. THX! > > OK, back to work! :-) Thanks for contributing to DL. :-) -- MfG / Regards Friedrich Lobenstock ____________________________________________________________________ Friedrich Lobenstock Linux Services Lobenstock URL: http://www.lsl.at/ Email: fl...@fl... ____________________________________________________________________ |