|
From: Oliver J. <oli...@mo...> - 2004-01-13 07:56:12
|
thats better then patching the old one .-) thx.. On Tue, 2004-01-13 at 03:23, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Friedrich Lobenstock wrote: > > > Can you please give more background info about this problem. I think > > such a patch might make more troubles in the long run as it looks > > very cosmetic to me. > > > > Could you please try to get a more official patch for that problem? > > > > > It's not a big deal, there's a 1.35 testing version available, which > compiles just fine. > > I will upload all the changes shortly. > > Heiko > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. > Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering > advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. > Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop |