Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Support for IPv6 and bonding

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:
> Heiko Zuerker wrote on 09.01.2004 02:53 MET:
> 
>> Friedrich Lobenstock wrote:
>>
>>> I would prefere the '|' instead of the '%' then, but anyway send
>>> me your patches when you've reworked them and I will check them.
>>
>>
>> I actually would stay away from '|', since it's special meaning on the 
>> command line. What's about using the '@', this would even make sense 
>> since it means (at).
> 
> 
> May I remind you that we are not on the command line.
> 
> Take a look:
> 
> with %
> IPV6ROUTE="3ffd:1:2::/48%3ffd:1:2:ffff::2"
> IPv6ROUTE="$IPV6ROUTE 3ffd:1:3::/48%3ffd:1:2:ffff::2"
> 
> with @
> IPV6ROUTE="3ffd:1:2::/48@3ffd:1:2:ffff::2"
> IPv6ROUTE="$IPV6ROUTE 3ffd:1:3::/48@3ffd:1:2:ffff::2"
> 
> with |
> IPV6ROUTE="3ffd:1:2::/48|3ffd:1:2:ffff::2"
> IPv6ROUTE="$IPV6ROUTE 3ffd:1:3::/48|3ffd:1:2:ffff::2"
> 
> IMO the '|' separates both sides optically better than '%'
> or '@' do because it comes closer to the ':'.
> 

OK let's vote about it, what do our co-developers/users want?
( Mails with anything else then @ are automatically disqualified ;-) )

Heiko