|
From: <hzu...@ra...> - 2004-01-06 18:39:58
|
On 01/06/2004 01:05:48 PM Bruce Smith wrote: >> i was surprised to hear that you're working/backporting things to >dl1.0. >> aren't users upgrading to latest cvs' version? > >1.0 is the latest stable version. It still needs to have security and >bug fixes. The average user should be using the 1.0 version. > >1.1 is the development version, and may not always be completely stable. >All new features and major changes go into 1.1, and it takes awhile to >get all the bugs out. 1.0 only gets fixes, so it remains stable. > >Think of it like the Linux kernel. 2.5 is the development version, and >at the same time 2.4 is still being maintained. Most end users are >still using 2.4. (yeah, I know 2.6 is out now, but forget about that :) There's not much I can add there, except that the i486 version of 1.0.4 already is on SF and the FTP Server. i686 is still compiling ( I NEED A FASTER BUILD MACHINE). Heiko |