Re: [Devil-linux-develop] changes in build setup for 1.1?

[<t....@co...>]

> > Looks like 1.1 has some revamped build methods, 
> 
> Yes, a little.  :-)
> 
> > I guess the build order 
> > is now done automatically via the dependencies list in the scripts? 
> 
> Yes, it uses the "Required-Start/Provides/Default-Start" stuff.
> 
> > But how is a new package added to the menus?
> 
> That hasn't changed.  Are you familiar with the old method?
> 
> > Also, is there really a need for a .configure file for each package? 
> > And does the makefile need all those options? The package in question 
> > (<http://thekelleys.org.uk/dnsmasq/>) has a very simple makefile that 
> > seems to compile by itself just fine....
> 
> That has nothing to do with DL.  It depends on the package itself.
> Some packages come with a ./configure file, some don't.  Some have
> different instructions to build and install the package.  You have 
> to write the script to match the package install instructions.
> 
>  - BS

I've forgotten how I got it into the menus before:) I lost that lfs tree during some gyrations with my build system:( I added the line into the build/.config file, but I'm sure thats not all it needs. I also need to do the insserv thing when setup on target too. Thanks-

Tim