|
From: Emmanuel E. <ee...@fr...> - 2004-01-03 16:04:02
|
Heiko Zuerker a =E9crit:
> Manu "MaNS" ESCAR wrote:
>=20
>> Hope every one had good time for this new-years eve! ;-))
>=20
>=20
> At least I had, how was yours?
Great ;-))
>=20
>> I'm working on the last hostap driver which is now 3 packages : the=20
>> driver, the utilities and the daemon. So I split the script in=20
>> build/scripts/ from hostap to hostap-driver, hostap-utils and=20
>> hostapd; then first build ... he couldn't find hostap script! In fact,=
=20
>> i had to manualy erase link in scripts/.buildorder and add the 3 new=20
>> ones to make it work ... also in rc1.d and rc2.d as i doesn't want an=20
>> mrproper ;-)
>>
>> The question is ... : do i have to add that link (in=20
>> scripts/.buildorder) myself or is the build system supposed to ?=20
>> (sorry for that, i didn't used the build system since 0.6 ...)
>=20
>=20
> Whenever you add / remove / rename any build scripts, you have to re-ru=
n=20
> "make prepare". You can run this any time, it will only re-order the=20
> build scripts.
Nice ...
>> For the others, I guess the next time I run 'make mrproper unpack=20
>> menuconfig prepare build ...' the right links will be created in rc$.d=
=20
>> by the insserv thing!
>=20
>=20
> Yes.
>=20
>> I also modified things in scripts/configuration/ to reflect new=20
>> modifications
>>
>> Am I missing something ?
>=20
>=20
> Did you also update the hostap.help file under configuration/help ?
Not yet, but thanks, think I should have missed it ;-)
>=20
>> Another question is : there's 2 ways to build the cardbus driver,=20
>> depending on which pcmcia support we will use : kernel or pcmcia_cs.=20
>> Does any one knows a {clean, clever...} way to copy them both in the=20
>> filesystem so we could choose the right one, depending on wether we=20
>> use pcmcia_cs or not (when DL is booted on a host), as they both have=20
>> the same name!
>>
>> Maybe the question is non-sense as we use pcmcia_cs with no other choi=
ce?
>=20
>=20
> At the moment we only support the pcmcia_cs drivers, since the kernel=20
> drivers are usually not as good. (Did that change lately ? )
Maybe as SuSE 9.0 seems to work quite fine with, but i know they often ma=
ke lots of kernel patches=20
... anyway it greatly simplifies things for me;-))
>=20
>> Another thing is I'm on the way to add support for several other=20
>> wireless drivers (TI *ACX100, */Atmel AT76C5XXx, and Madwifi for=20
>> /Atheros AR500X chip sets) as i can have opportunity to hire some for=20
>> testing purpose. Is there any pb with madwifi as they are using a=20
>> binary-only HAL modul supported by Atheros ? the project seems GPLed=20
>> anyway ... http://sourceforge.net/projects/madwifi/
>=20
>=20
> As Friedrich wrote, we need to be carefull about the copyrights.
>=20
I try to be carefull with that, that's why i submit it to You All ... as =
my English et legal stuff=20
(mis)understanding may lead me in bad ways ... ;-)
Cya
MaNU
> Heiko
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
> Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM=
's
> Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admi=
n.
> Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D1278&alloc_id=3D3371&op=3Dclick
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-develop mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop
>=20
>=20
|