|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2003-12-26 19:16:15
|
Martin Glazer wrote: >On December 26, 2003 10:56 am, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > >>Martin Glazer wrote: >> >> >>>On December 26, 2003 10:13 am, Heiko Zuerker wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Martin Glazer wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>How does DL handle package dependencies? >>>>> >>>>>I found that the build will fail when certain packages are missing >>>>>dependencies - for example: squid fails if LDAP is not selected, gcc >>>>>fails if the gcc Stack Smashing Protector is not selected, etc. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>Should not happen. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>How is this or should this be resolved? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>Those are simply bugs in the build system which have to be resolved. >>>>I.e. for squid there must be a IF statement added, which adds LDAP >>>>support only when LDAP is selected. >>>> >>>>GCC must also work without the SSP selected. >>>> >>>>It would be great if you could help us out there and fix it. >>>> >>>> >>>Sure. >>> >>> >>Cool thanks. >> >> >> >>>I don't see a problem doing the squid fix, but I'll have to look into the >>>gcc issue further. No promises on time though, as I'm going on vacation >>>for the next month and will have limited access. >>> >>> >>A full month vacation ? Lucky you ! >> >> > >Haven't been home for 5 years and with 2 days travel time each way, a month >goes by pretty quickly... > I can accept you "excuse". ;-) >>Take your time, it's enough when you finish it by tonight. ;-) >> >> >> > >I'll talk to the pilot - explain the situation about me having to fix this >stuff and see if they can make any exceptions about putting laptops away >during take-off and landings. I'm sure they'll understand ;-) > > Yes they will. Otherwise just tell them when they don't let you, you will explode. ;-) Heiko |