|
From: Diego T. <dt...@co...> - 2003-12-23 01:09:44
|
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 02:14:46PM -0500, Heiko Zuerker wrote: sorry for the other mail (the one with the bad address :=) it was my spam-fighting account, and i forgot to change it back to the "usual" :) > >and nfs-client/server on userland? > > > > > Do you know what NFS stands for? No File Security ;-) > > Since it's such an unsecure protocol, I hesitated so far about including > it. > But as always I'm open for a discussion about it. one day i needed a network filesystem, and nfs came to my hand :) of course it isn't secure (i use it with ssh over the network) but without doubt is more standard for talking with other unix boxes that samba. good point: it has a userland implementation. if someone breaks it, he/she won't trash the full box, only a daemon. bad: we already have coda :) (and i've never used it :) so: i don't know, i could use coda on my fileserver instead of nfs :) i didn't want to star a flame, only ask about opinions :))) -- -- gnupg keyfingerprint -- 48AF 5BF9 8F54 2966 64CC 2327 7CD0 DD91 B09D 5799 -- Use of a keyboard or mouse may be linked to serious injuries or disorders. Diego Torres - dtorres at anthalia dot org - Madrid / España |