Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Abort ...

[Heiko Z. <he...@zu...>]

Bruce Smith wrote:

>>>>Could it be that some other libraries cause problems ?
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>No, I tracked it down.  It's heimdal that's causing the problem.
>>>heimdal replaces "/usr/include/fnmatch.h" with it's own include,
>>>and that version doesn't define some constants needed by busybox.
>>>
>>>I'm not sure the right way to "fix" this problem.
>>>
>>>I could omit compiling heimdal from menuconfig ...  :-)
>>>
>>>Or I could change the order so busybox compiles before heimdal,
>>>but I don't know what other packages after heimdal would abort.
>>>
>>>Or I could change the heimdal script to restore the include file
>>>after it's done compiling.
>>>      
>>>
>>Crap! I hate when that happens...
>>Check out who else a fnmatch.h : find build/tmp -name "fnmatch\.h"
>>    
>>
>
>Been there, done that (while tracking this down).
>
>-r--r--r--    1 games    300          2606 Sep 14  1996 ./cdrtools-2.0/mkisofs/fnmatch.h
>-rw-------    1 4770     43           2373 Dec  5  2001 ./cpio-2.5/fnmatch.h
>-r--r--r--    1 9080     bin          2349 Sep 26  1994 ./findutils-4.1/lib/fnmatch.h
>-rw-r--r--    1 3508     43           2426 Mar 14  2001 ./gcc-3.2.3/include/fnmatch.h
>-rw-r--r--    1 fred     fred           84 Aug  4  2002 ./glibc-2.3.2/include/fnmatch.h
>-rw-r--r--    1 fred     fred         2998 Jul  7  2001 ./glibc-2.3.2/posix/fnmatch.h
>-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         2436 Mar  4  2001 ./grep-2.5/lib/fnmatch.h
>-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         2285 Oct 30 15:33 ./heimdal-0.6/include/fnmatch.h
>-rw-r--r--    1 root     root         2285 Oct 30 15:33 ./heimdal-0.6/lib/roken/fnmatch.h
>-rw-r--r--    1 104      503          3028 Mar 26  2001 ./lftp-2.6.6/lib/fnmatch.h
>-rwxr-----    1 root     root         1416 Jan  2  1997 ./pd-cvs-1.10.8-PD2/lib/fnmatch.h
>-rw-r--r--    1 2161     2161         2959 Mar 10  2000 ./rpm-4.0.4/misc/fnmatch.h
>-rw-r--r--    1 501      501          2998 Sep 27  2001 ./uClibc-0.9.19/include/fnmatch.h
>
>Lots of different sizes.  Which one is the "right" one?  :-)
>  
>
I would say the glibc one.

>>For now I would say, let heimdal restore the original file.
>>    
>>
>
>It appears that heimdal replaces about 40 include files, judging from
>the modification times of the files in /usr/include.  What other
>problems is this going to cause?
>
>Should we make heimdal compile dead last?  (if so, how do I do that?)
>Or switch back to krb5 ... ?  :-)
>
>Or is there some way to compile heimdal and tell it NOT to be mucking
>with our /usr/include directory?  (the best option IMO)
>  
>
krb5 was installed into a separate directory, looks like we should do 
this again.
I'll document a bug .

cya
  Heiko