|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2003-10-11 00:21:18
|
Bruce Smith wrote: >>>Now wait a minute. I thought 1.0 was frozen to new additions? :-) >>> >>> >>> >>Yeah it is. >>But Friedrich (he again...) send out this email with the this link.... >>http://www.pathname.com/fhs/2.2/fhs-6.1.html >>see 6.1.2 >> >>So I classified it as bug., because I got the message. ;-) >> >> > >In that sense, all the stuff I've been doing in 1.1 are really bug >fixes. I can rationalize too, check this out: :-) > >It started out with the squid authorization modules not working. >(because they were not being compiled). Then I tried the yp_auth module >and it didn't run because it needed ypbind to be running. So I added >ypbind, but it wouldn't compile without yp-tools, so I added it. Then >ypbind didn't run because it needed the RPC portmapper. So I added the >portmapper, but it wouldn't compile because it needed tcp_wrappers, so I >added it ... (talk about dependency hell! :) > >You see, all one big BUG FIX!!! ;-) >(and the most amazing thing is it even works!) >Feel free to back port the changes to 1.0! (or not :) > You'll use a CVS version anyway, so I don't even argument with you. >BTW, while I was adding all the NIS crap, I also added ypserv so it's >all there, also a bug fix since we don't want only part of the yp crap. > > You're so full of shit sometimes ! But that's why I like you. ;-) >And I also wrote some enhancements to yp_auth.c, now a patch on DL. >(I'll spare you the details unless you really want to hear about it) >Maybe I should submit that patch to the squid people ... > > Yes please submit the patch, so others can benefit from it to. cya Heiko |