You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(21) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(58) |
Nov
(75) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(101) |
Mar
(103) |
Apr
(125) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(62) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(214) |
Nov
(290) |
Dec
(274) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(187) |
Feb
(172) |
Mar
(313) |
Apr
(209) |
May
(169) |
Jun
(147) |
Jul
(118) |
Aug
(193) |
Sep
(227) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(246) |
Dec
(191) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(244) |
Feb
(175) |
Mar
(165) |
Apr
(130) |
May
(217) |
Jun
(122) |
Jul
(188) |
Aug
(235) |
Sep
(165) |
Oct
(133) |
Nov
(209) |
Dec
(88) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(108) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(122) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(42) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(151) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(72) |
Jul
(73) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(40) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
|
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
|
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2009-09-11 20:10:27
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: Heiko Zuerker [mailto:he...@zu...] > Sent: Friday, July 24, 2009 11:26 AM > To: Devil-Linux Developer Mailinglist; Devil-Linux Discuss Mailinglist > Subject: [Devil-Linux-discuss] new testing release > > I uploaded a new testing release to the FTP server. > > If you did submit bugs, please download and test if they're resolved > now. > Please respond to your bugs, so we can close them if they're fixed. I uploaded the latest testing version to the FTP server. Heiko |
|
From: Andrzej O. <an...@ma...> - 2009-09-11 10:28:55
|
Rowan Schischka wrote:
> Searching for Devil-linux CD-ROM
> checking /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 mount failed
> checking /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2 mount failed
> checking /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part3 mount failed
> !!! Devil-linux CD-ROM not found !!!
>
> Please check your Hardware!
>
> it is interesting that the error message says that the devil linux cd
> cannot be found even when booting from the devil linux cd! does any body
> know all the circumstances this OS would print this error message, i say
> this in regards to the fact that i have tried it on three different
> systems from different types/ages of computer hardware
It is normal. When booting, CD is read by BIOS program; motherboard BIOS or
controler card BIOS. BIOS was written for exactly known hardware, i.e.
motherboard BIOS know, how to read CD via south bridge IC.
After kernel loading, CD with rest of system programs must be mount for this
kernel as filesystem. This is work of script mount_cdrom from initrd. Look for
script fragment:
> if [ ! $silent ]; then
> echo "Searching for Devil-Linux CD-ROM"
> fi
>
> # generate list of cdroms from devfs
> DEVICES_IDE=`find /dev -name "hd?" 2> /dev/null`
> CDROM_SCSI=`find /dev -name "sr?" 2> /dev/null`
> CDROMS="$DEVICES_IDE $CDROM_SCSI"
>
> DEVICE_USER=`awk -v RS=' ' -v FS='=' '/^DL_device=/ { print $2 }' /proc/cmdline`
> DEVICE_USER_ONLY=`grep -c DL_device /proc/cmdline`
>
> if [ "$DEVICE_USER_ONLY" != "0" ]; then
> echo "Disabling automatic scanning for Devil-Linux iso image! Good Luck."
> CDROMS=$DEVICE_USER
> fi
>
> if [ ! $silent ]; then
> echo "Search list: $CDROMS"
> fi
>
> for disk in $CDROMS
> do
> echo -n "checking $disk "
> if /sbin/mount -n -t iso9660 -o ro $disk ${mountpoint} 2> /dev/null; then
> if [ -e ${mountpoint}/DEVIL-LINUX ] ; then
> if [ ! $silent ]; then
> echo -e "Found on $disk"
> fi
> echo $disk > /shm/DL_DEVICE
>
> # run from ram if correct variable is set
> run_from_ram --cdrom
>
> exit 0
> else
> echo "wrong media"
> /sbin/umount ${mountpoint}
> fi
> else
> echo "mount failed"
> fi
> done
As you can see, CD must be visible via kernel drivers. All IDE ans SCSI
devices are checked for presence of this CD, D-L was booted from. Checked are
all /dev/hd? and /dev/sr? devices. But in your case from this groups only IDE
hard disk was found and checked.
Probably all your boxes was configured in manner, so CD drive is not visible
as Linux device. It means, that in D-L kernel no driver for your CD
controller, so CD can not be mount.
There are many solutions. Try one of following:
-- connect CD drive to this same channel, as your
(visible for kernel) ID HD
-- replace CD drive (i.e. IDE to SATA or SATA to IDE)
-- if on motherboard are some numbers of SATA controller,
connect CD drive to other SATA controller
-- change SATA controller mode in BIOS setup, so it vill be
visible for actual kernel drivers
-- recompile kernel, adding divers correct for your devices
-- boot from USB mass storage device
Best Regards
--
Andrzej Odyniec
|
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2009-09-11 08:32:40
|
Welcome to Devil-Linux, Rowan! I have never seen this error message before, so my only direct suggestion would be that you re-burn the CD - perhaps it is faulty? But I strongly recommend the Devil-Linux 1.4RC1 version from ftp://ftp.devil-linux.org/pub/releases/ for a new installation rather than 1.2.x. It uses the 2.6 Linux kernel instead of 2.4 and it might well solve your specific problem. Or you could try the 1.4RC2 version from ftp://ftp.devil-linux.org/pub/devel/testing/. I have been using 1.4RC1 happily for several months. [I'm waiting for 1.4RC2-i686-server before moving to that release : ) ] Dominic Rowan Schischka wrote: > ok im new to this flavour of linux. i have used several others and i > decided to try this one to set up a dedicated http server. my hardware > is various so ill just say i have one core2 cpu with ide cd, one p3 > with ide cd and a compact flash disk as a hard drive, and one compac > preasrio laptop with a sata cd. i have tried to boot this distro on > all my machines, off cd rom and off usb and off a compact flash hard > drive. i have had success with using damn small linux as a http server > off my p3 but i really want to use this distro because of the lack of > gui. all of my computers (with all configurations i can think of) come > up with the same error which i can not google an answer for. this is > why i am posting here. the error is: > > Searching for Devil-linux CD-ROM > checking /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 mount failed > checking /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2 mount failed > checking /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part3 mount failed > !!! Devil-linux CD-ROM not found !!! > > Please check your Hardware! > > it is interesting that the error message says that the devil linux cd > cannot be found even when booting from the devil linux cd! does any > body know all the circumstances this OS would print this error > message, i say this in regards to the fact that i have tried it on > three different systems from different types/ages of computer hardware |
|
From: Rowan S. <row...@ho...> - 2009-09-11 07:09:24
|
ok im new to this flavour of linux. i have used several others and i decided to try this one to set up a dedicated http server. my hardware is various so ill just say i have one core2 cpu with ide cd, one p3 with ide cd and a compact flash disk as a hard drive, and one compac preasrio laptop with a sata cd. i have tried to boot this distro on all my machines, off cd rom and off usb and off a compact flash hard drive. i have had success with using damn small linux as a http server off my p3 but i really want to use this distro because of the lack of gui. all of my computers (with all configurations i can think of) come up with the same error which i can not google an answer for. this is why i am posting here. the error is: Searching for Devil-linux CD-ROM checking /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part1 mount failed checking /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2 mount failed checking /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part3 mount failed !!! Devil-linux CD-ROM not found !!! Please check your Hardware! it is interesting that the error message says that the devil linux cd cannot be found even when booting from the devil linux cd! does any body know all the circumstances this OS would print this error message, i say this in regards to the fact that i have tried it on three different systems from different types/ages of computer hardware _________________________________________________________________ Search jobs from NZ's #1 job site 1000s of jobs online right now! http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/157639089/direct/01/ |
|
From: Dietmar R. <die...@gm...> - 2009-09-09 08:09:39
|
2009/9/9 Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...>: > Actually, I was not sure we need it enabled by default, so the last change was > really absent. I've submitted the change just now and it will be a part of > official DL. Thank you so much... Didi |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2009-09-09 02:40:04
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: >> Does, this mean, that I'd have to build (compile) DL on my own? >> As far as I found out, shorewall (which I'm using and which is shipped >> with DL) is not supporting l7-filter... > > I thought Serge wrote in an earlier post that he fixed it. > Actually, I was not sure we need it enabled by default, so the last change was really absent. I've submitted the change just now and it will be a part of official DL. Sincerely, Serge |
|
From: David M. L. <dm...@fl...> - 2009-09-08 14:17:26
|
There's a relatively new resolver project called "Unbound" at http://www.unbound.net/ which is a lightweight resolver implementation (BSD license). It's quite a bit simpler to configure than BIND, and also supports DNSSEC. Any thoughts about putting it in DL? - DML |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2009-09-08 13:07:41
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: Dietmar Rieder [mailto:die...@gm...] > Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 6:40 AM > To: dev...@li... > Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] new testing release > > 2009/8/25 Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...>: > > Heiko Zuerker wrote: > >> It just hit me, wouldn't the l7filter do the same thing? > >> http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/ > >> > > Probably yes. :-) I didn't compare those extensions. We can leave it > as an > > option for individual builders because p-o-m is controlled by > external config > > file and everything is disabled by default. > > > > Does, this mean, that I'd have to build (compile) DL on my own? > As far as I found out, shorewall (which I'm using and which is shipped > with DL) is not supporting l7-filter... I thought Serge wrote in an earlier post that he fixed it. Heiko |
|
From: Dietmar R. <die...@gm...> - 2009-09-08 11:40:21
|
2009/8/25 Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...>: > Heiko Zuerker wrote: >> It just hit me, wouldn't the l7filter do the same thing? >> http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/ >> > Probably yes. :-) I didn't compare those extensions. We can leave it as an > option for individual builders because p-o-m is controlled by external config > file and everything is disabled by default. > Does, this mean, that I'd have to build (compile) DL on my own? As far as I found out, shorewall (which I'm using and which is shipped with DL) is not supporting l7-filter... Didi |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2009-09-06 16:09:25
|
Just add the request to our bug tracker: http://www.devil-linux.org/support/bugs.php This way we won't forget about it. Heiko > -----Original Message----- > From: Bradlee Landis [mailto:bra...@gm...] > Sent: Thursday, September 03, 2009 2:29 PM > To: dev...@li... > Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Ethernet Ordering > > Ah, ic. I looked at it, but I didn't see a way right off the bat. > Maybe I'll start looking at 1.4RC. > > I'd like to make a small request (if it isn't already included in > 1.4). Add a flag to turn off colors in save-config. It's nice on the > standard console, but we are running the program from a web interface, > and through an ncurses program, and neither of them like colors. > > Thanks, > -Brad > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Serge Leschinsky<fi...@in...> > wrote: > > Bradlee > > > > DL 1.2 uses devfs. Probably /etc/devfs.conf or /etc/devfs.rules may > help. > > > > I'm sorry but I haven't been touching devfs for a long time and just > don't > > remember how to customize that. > > > > Serge > > > > Serge Leschinsky wrote: > >> Yes. I'm speaking about RC version... > >> > >> Serge > >> > >> > >> Bradlee Landis wrote: > >>> There is not an /etc/udev or a /lib/udev on my system (it's DL > 1.2.15 > >>> I think). Maybe you're on the new RC version? > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > --------- > > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 > 30-Day > > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and > focus on > > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > > _______________________________________________ > > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > > Dev...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > ------- > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 > 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and > focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Bradlee L. <bra...@gm...> - 2009-09-03 19:29:20
|
Ah, ic. I looked at it, but I didn't see a way right off the bat. Maybe I'll start looking at 1.4RC. I'd like to make a small request (if it isn't already included in 1.4). Add a flag to turn off colors in save-config. It's nice on the standard console, but we are running the program from a web interface, and through an ncurses program, and neither of them like colors. Thanks, -Brad On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 9:19 PM, Serge Leschinsky<fi...@in...> wrote: > Bradlee > > DL 1.2 uses devfs. Probably /etc/devfs.conf or /etc/devfs.rules may help. > > I'm sorry but I haven't been touching devfs for a long time and just don't > remember how to customize that. > > Serge > > Serge Leschinsky wrote: >> Yes. I'm speaking about RC version... >> >> Serge >> >> >> Bradlee Landis wrote: >>> There is not an /etc/udev or a /lib/udev on my system (it's DL 1.2.15 >>> I think). Maybe you're on the new RC version? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2009-09-03 02:21:54
|
Bradlee DL 1.2 uses devfs. Probably /etc/devfs.conf or /etc/devfs.rules may help. I'm sorry but I haven't been touching devfs for a long time and just don't remember how to customize that. Serge Serge Leschinsky wrote: > Yes. I'm speaking about RC version... > > Serge > > > Bradlee Landis wrote: >> There is not an /etc/udev or a /lib/udev on my system (it's DL 1.2.15 >> I think). Maybe you're on the new RC version? |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2009-09-02 18:40:43
|
Yes. I'm speaking about RC version...
Serge
Bradlee Landis wrote:
> There is not an /etc/udev or a /lib/udev on my system (it's DL 1.2.15
> I think). Maybe you're on the new RC version?
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Serge Leschinsky<fi...@in...> wrote:
>> Hello Bradlee,
>>
>> Bradlee Landis wrote:
>>> How does devil linux decide how to order the ethernet devices?
>> To be precise, it does not DL, but udev subsystem. The answer on your question
>> is somewhere inside '/lib/udev/write_net_rules' (it's shell script) :-)
>>
>>> installed it on about 10 servers, and it does it the same way every
>>> time:
>>> Physical Device
>>> 1 eth2
>>> 2 eth3
>>> 3 eth0
>>> 4 eth1
>>> 5 eth7
>>> 6 eth6
>>> 7 eth5
>>> 8 eth4
>> You can check the order of your NICS in
>> '/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules' file (and change the order, if you
>> want).
>>
>> On my system it looks like the following:
>>
>> root@Devil:~ # cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
>> # This file was automatically generated by the /lib/udev/write_net_rules
>> # program, run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules file.
>> #
>> # You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single
>> # line, and change only the value of the NAME= key.
>>
>> # PCI device 0x10ec:0x8169 (r8169)
>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
>> ATTR{address}=="00:14:d1:16:ab:c5", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth1"
>>
>> # PCI device 0x10ec:0x8139 (8139too)
>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
>> ATTR{address}=="00:0a:e6:88:8f:4d", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Serge
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
>> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
>> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
>> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
>> Dev...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss
>
|
|
From: David M. L. <dm...@fl...> - 2009-09-02 15:07:06
|
The new RC is so much better than the stable version that I can't recommend
it enough.
- DML
On 09/02/2009 08:47 AM, Bradlee Landis wrote:
> There is not an /etc/udev or a /lib/udev on my system (it's DL 1.2.15
> I think). Maybe you're on the new RC version?
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Serge Leschinsky<fi...@in...> wrote:
>> Hello Bradlee,
>>
>> Bradlee Landis wrote:
>>> How does devil linux decide how to order the ethernet devices?
>> To be precise, it does not DL, but udev subsystem. The answer on your question
>> is somewhere inside '/lib/udev/write_net_rules' (it's shell script) :-)
>>
>>> installed it on about 10 servers, and it does it the same way every
>>> time:
>>> Physical Device
>>> 1 eth2
>>> 2 eth3
>>> 3 eth0
>>> 4 eth1
>>> 5 eth7
>>> 6 eth6
>>> 7 eth5
>>> 8 eth4
>> You can check the order of your NICS in
>> '/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules' file (and change the order, if you
>> want).
>>
>> On my system it looks like the following:
>>
>> root@Devil:~ # cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
>> # This file was automatically generated by the /lib/udev/write_net_rules
>> # program, run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules file.
>> #
>> # You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single
>> # line, and change only the value of the NAME= key.
>>
>> # PCI device 0x10ec:0x8169 (r8169)
>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
>> ATTR{address}=="00:14:d1:16:ab:c5", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth1"
>>
>> # PCI device 0x10ec:0x8139 (8139too)
>> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
>> ATTR{address}=="00:0a:e6:88:8f:4d", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Serge
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
>> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
>> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
>> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
>> _______________________________________________
>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
>> Dev...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss
>>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss
|
|
From: Bradlee L. <bra...@gm...> - 2009-09-02 14:20:07
|
There is not an /etc/udev or a /lib/udev on my system (it's DL 1.2.15
I think). Maybe you're on the new RC version?
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Serge Leschinsky<fi...@in...> wrote:
> Hello Bradlee,
>
> Bradlee Landis wrote:
>> How does devil linux decide how to order the ethernet devices?
> To be precise, it does not DL, but udev subsystem. The answer on your question
> is somewhere inside '/lib/udev/write_net_rules' (it's shell script) :-)
>
>> installed it on about 10 servers, and it does it the same way every
>> time:
>> Physical Device
>> 1 eth2
>> 2 eth3
>> 3 eth0
>> 4 eth1
>> 5 eth7
>> 6 eth6
>> 7 eth5
>> 8 eth4
>
> You can check the order of your NICS in
> '/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules' file (and change the order, if you
> want).
>
> On my system it looks like the following:
>
> root@Devil:~ # cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
> # This file was automatically generated by the /lib/udev/write_net_rules
> # program, run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules file.
> #
> # You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single
> # line, and change only the value of the NAME= key.
>
> # PCI device 0x10ec:0x8169 (r8169)
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
> ATTR{address}=="00:14:d1:16:ab:c5", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth1"
>
> # PCI device 0x10ec:0x8139 (8139too)
> SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
> ATTR{address}=="00:0a:e6:88:8f:4d", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Serge
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
> _______________________________________________
> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss
>
|
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2009-09-02 02:52:56
|
Hello Bradlee,
Bradlee Landis wrote:
> How does devil linux decide how to order the ethernet devices?
To be precise, it does not DL, but udev subsystem. The answer on your question
is somewhere inside '/lib/udev/write_net_rules' (it's shell script) :-)
> installed it on about 10 servers, and it does it the same way every
> time:
> Physical Device
> 1 eth2
> 2 eth3
> 3 eth0
> 4 eth1
> 5 eth7
> 6 eth6
> 7 eth5
> 8 eth4
You can check the order of your NICS in
'/etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules' file (and change the order, if you
want).
On my system it looks like the following:
root@Devil:~ # cat /etc/udev/rules.d/70-persistent-net.rules
# This file was automatically generated by the /lib/udev/write_net_rules
# program, run by the persistent-net-generator.rules rules file.
#
# You can modify it, as long as you keep each rule on a single
# line, and change only the value of the NAME= key.
# PCI device 0x10ec:0x8169 (r8169)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
ATTR{address}=="00:14:d1:16:ab:c5", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth1"
# PCI device 0x10ec:0x8139 (8139too)
SUBSYSTEM=="net", ACTION=="add", DRIVERS=="?*",
ATTR{address}=="00:0a:e6:88:8f:4d", ATTR{type}=="1", KERNEL=="eth*", NAME="eth0"
Sincerely,
Serge
|
|
From: Bradlee L. <bra...@gm...> - 2009-09-01 18:30:10
|
How does devil linux decide how to order the ethernet devices? I've installed it on about 10 servers, and it does it the same way every time: Physical Device 1 eth2 2 eth3 3 eth0 4 eth1 5 eth7 6 eth6 7 eth5 8 eth4 The mac addresses seem to be in the order of the physical location, and Finnix (which I use to install Devil) seems to get it right every time. It could be the difference in the kernel from 2.4 to 2.6. |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2009-08-25 03:06:20
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: > It just hit me, wouldn't the l7filter do the same thing? > http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/ > Probably yes. :-) I didn't compare those extensions. We can leave it as an option for individual builders because p-o-m is controlled by external config file and everything is disabled by default. Serge |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2009-08-24 11:41:16
|
It just hit me, wouldn't the l7filter do the same thing? http://l7-filter.sourceforge.net/ Heiko Quoting Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...>: > Hello, > > Dietmar Rieder wrote: >> 2009/8/19 Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...>: >>> Hey, >>> >>> not sure if it was removed by the netfilter team or we just have it >>> accidentally disabled. >>> Please create a bug report in Mantis, the link is on our website. >> >> Done! >> Thanks. > I've managed to build ipp2p extension for DL 1.4RC2. The only one simple > modification is required. I've added the patch to the pom tarball. > The changes > will be submitted soon. > > root@gw:~ # iptables -A FORWARD -m ipp2p --edk --kazaa --bit -j DROP > root@gw:~ # iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m ipp2p --ares -j DROP > root@gw:~ # iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -m ipp2p --kazaa -j DROP > root@gw:~ # > root@gw:~ # iptables -nvL > Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 59 packets, 3836 bytes) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source > destination > > Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes) > pkts bytes target prot opt in out source > destination > 0 0 DROP all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 > ipp2p v0.8.2-pomng --kazaa --edk --bit > 0 0 DROP tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 > ipp2p v0.8.2-pomng --ares > 0 0 DROP udp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 > ipp2p v0.8.2-pomng --kazaa > > Sincerely, > Serge > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2009-08-24 04:16:13
|
Hello,
Dietmar Rieder wrote:
> 2009/8/19 Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...>:
>> Hey,
>>
>> not sure if it was removed by the netfilter team or we just have it
>> accidentally disabled.
>> Please create a bug report in Mantis, the link is on our website.
>
> Done!
> Thanks.
I've managed to build ipp2p extension for DL 1.4RC2. The only one simple
modification is required. I've added the patch to the pom tarball. The changes
will be submitted soon.
root@gw:~ # iptables -A FORWARD -m ipp2p --edk --kazaa --bit -j DROP
root@gw:~ # iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp -m ipp2p --ares -j DROP
root@gw:~ # iptables -A FORWARD -p udp -m ipp2p --kazaa -j DROP
root@gw:~ #
root@gw:~ # iptables -nvL
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 59 packets, 3836 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT 0 packets, 0 bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination
0 0 DROP all -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
ipp2p v0.8.2-pomng --kazaa --edk --bit
0 0 DROP tcp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
ipp2p v0.8.2-pomng --ares
0 0 DROP udp -- * * 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0
ipp2p v0.8.2-pomng --kazaa
Sincerely,
Serge
|
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2009-08-22 03:27:38
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: >> >> if the host system is DL to use DL's grub >> if the host system is not DL to use grub from the host system. > > Yes that should work. > Done. Serge |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2009-08-21 12:09:39
|
Quoting Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...>: > Heiko, > > we can implement the following logic: > > if the host system is DL to use DL's grub > if the host system is not DL to use grub from the host system. > It's not an elegant but should work (if the host system doesn't use grub2). Yes that should work. [....] -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2009-08-21 09:04:27
|
Heiko, we can implement the following logic: if the host system is DL to use DL's grub if the host system is not DL to use grub from the host system. It's not an elegant but should work (if the host system doesn't use grub2). Another option is to try elf sections of grub binary modification during the installation. What do you think? Maurizio, could you please install DL on usb/hdd from DL which is loaded as a Live-CD ? It's proven way to install DL on usb/hdd. Serge Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Look in the mailinglist archives, I think Serge posted a workaround. > > Heiko > > Quoting Maurizio Marini <ma...@da...>: > >> Hi there >> i would notify a segfault: >> >> >> copying files >> copying source file /tmp/bootcd.iso to device mounted on >> /tmp/Downloads/devil-linux-1.4RC2-2009-07-24-i686/tmp-install2usb/disk-mnt/bootcd.iso >> Configuring Grub boot sector and menu... >> Do you want to edit the grub menu file (y/n) y >> >> nano / >> >> GNU nano 2.0.6 File: >> /tmp/Downloads/devil-linux-1.4RC2-2009-07-24-i686/tmp-install2usb/grub.conf >> >> [screen is terminating] >> Probing devices to guess BIOS drives. This may take a long time. >> ./install-on-usb: line 120: 15166 Segmentation fault >> $grub_shell --batch --device-map=$device_map > /dev/null <<-EOF >> root $root_drive >> setup $force_lba $install_drive >> quit >> EOF >> >> syncing and unmounting (this could take a while) >> >> -- >> Maurizio >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day >> trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on >> what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with >> Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >> > > > |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2009-08-20 19:45:35
|
Look in the mailinglist archives, I think Serge posted a workaround. Heiko Quoting Maurizio Marini <ma...@da...>: > Hi there > i would notify a segfault: > > > copying files > copying source file /tmp/bootcd.iso to device mounted on > /tmp/Downloads/devil-linux-1.4RC2-2009-07-24-i686/tmp-install2usb/disk-mnt/bootcd.iso > Configuring Grub boot sector and menu... > Do you want to edit the grub menu file (y/n) y > > nano / > > GNU nano 2.0.6 File: > /tmp/Downloads/devil-linux-1.4RC2-2009-07-24-i686/tmp-install2usb/grub.conf > > [screen is terminating] > Probing devices to guess BIOS drives. This may take a long time. > ./install-on-usb: line 120: 15166 Segmentation fault > $grub_shell --batch --device-map=$device_map > /dev/null <<-EOF > root $root_drive > setup $force_lba $install_drive > quit > EOF > > syncing and unmounting (this could take a while) > > -- > Maurizio > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Maurizio M. <ma...@da...> - 2009-08-20 08:22:30
|
Hi there i would notify a segfault: copying files copying source file /tmp/bootcd.iso to device mounted on /tmp/Downloads/devil-linux-1.4RC2-2009-07-24-i686/tmp-install2usb/disk-mnt/bootcd.iso Configuring Grub boot sector and menu... Do you want to edit the grub menu file (y/n) y nano / GNU nano 2.0.6 File: /tmp/Downloads/devil-linux-1.4RC2-2009-07-24-i686/tmp-install2usb/grub.conf [screen is terminating] Probing devices to guess BIOS drives. This may take a long time. ./install-on-usb: line 120: 15166 Segmentation fault $grub_shell --batch --device-map=$device_map > /dev/null <<-EOF root $root_drive setup $force_lba $install_drive quit EOF syncing and unmounting (this could take a while) -- Maurizio |