Menu
▾
▴
devil-linux-discuss — General Mailing List for all discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(21) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(58) |
Nov
(75) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(101) |
Mar
(103) |
Apr
(125) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(62) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(214) |
Nov
(290) |
Dec
(274) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(187) |
Feb
(172) |
Mar
(313) |
Apr
(209) |
May
(169) |
Jun
(147) |
Jul
(118) |
Aug
(193) |
Sep
(227) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(246) |
Dec
(191) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(244) |
Feb
(175) |
Mar
(165) |
Apr
(130) |
May
(217) |
Jun
(122) |
Jul
(188) |
Aug
(235) |
Sep
(165) |
Oct
(133) |
Nov
(209) |
Dec
(88) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(108) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(122) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(42) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(151) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(72) |
Jul
(73) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(40) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
|
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
|
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2009-10-21 13:44:24
|
Quoting Bruce Smith <bw...@re...>: >> I recently switched to the free ESXi and I like it a lot. > > Agree! ESXi is a great product. > > I've used it in production for a couple clients. > >> The main problem with ESXi > > The other main problem with ESXi is a Windows-only client is required > to administer it. Which for us Mac & Linux only households, it means > I still need a copy of the old VMware-server (free) on Linux, or > VMware-Fusion (not free) on Mac to run Windows to admin VMware-ESXi. > :-( I have a Windows VM running with the client installed. ;-) >> is the limited hardware support, I ended up >> replacing a few components of my server to be able to use ESXi. > > I'd love to be able to run ESXi at home on an old PC, but I haven't > attempted it yet. (and I don't want to spend thousands of dollars on > "supported" server hardware) > > What problems did you run into? What hardware did you replace to > make it run? It was a step-by-step process, but I basically I ended up replacing my 3ware sata raid controller with a LSI1068E one (supermicro has a cheap one), replaced the NIC with a Intel based Gig desktop card and also ended up replacing my board/cpu/ram since I wanted the hw virtualization support. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@re...> - 2009-10-21 13:20:11
|
> I recently switched to the free ESXi and I like it a lot. Agree! ESXi is a great product. I've used it in production for a couple clients. > The main problem with ESXi The other main problem with ESXi is a Windows-only client is required to administer it. Which for us Mac & Linux only households, it means I still need a copy of the old VMware-server (free) on Linux, or VMware-Fusion (not free) on Mac to run Windows to admin VMware-ESXi. :-( > is the limited hardware support, I ended up > replacing a few components of my server to be able to use ESXi. I'd love to be able to run ESXi at home on an old PC, but I haven't attempted it yet. (and I don't want to spend thousands of dollars on "supported" server hardware) What problems did you run into? What hardware did you replace to make it run? - BS |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2009-10-21 08:09:16
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Quoting Dominic Raferd <dl...@ed...>: > > >> Heiko Zuerker wrote: >> >>> Quoting Dominic Raferd <dl...@ed...>: >>> >>>> Does anyone know if it is possible to run VMware Server on Devil-Linux >>>> (and thus use DL machine to host other vms)? If not, is there any other >>>> way to host VMs on DL? [I know it's regularly done the other way around >>>> (DL as a VM on a different host system.)] >>>> >>>> >>> It would only work with the server version of DL >>> >> good this is the one I use >> >>> and you'd have to compile the vmware server modules within the build system. >>> >>> >> oh dear, that's beyond me I think, I'm just a humble user >> >>> So in theory it should work. >>> >> Thanks Heiko for the swift response but I guess it will have to remain >> theoretical for me. I'll find a different host for the VMs. >> > > I recently switched to the free ESXi and I like it a lot. > The main problem with ESXi is the limited hardware support, I ended up > replacing a few components of my server to be able to use ESXi. Thanks for the tip, I was unaware of this product and it looks pretty neat, I will investigate further. Dominic |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2009-10-20 17:31:51
|
Quoting Dominic Raferd <dl...@ed...>: > Heiko Zuerker wrote: >> Quoting Dominic Raferd <dl...@ed...>: >>> Does anyone know if it is possible to run VMware Server on Devil-Linux >>> (and thus use DL machine to host other vms)? If not, is there any other >>> way to host VMs on DL? [I know it's regularly done the other way around >>> (DL as a VM on a different host system.)] >>> >> It would only work with the server version of DL > good this is the one I use >> and you'd have to compile the vmware server modules within the build system. >> > oh dear, that's beyond me I think, I'm just a humble user >> So in theory it should work. > Thanks Heiko for the swift response but I guess it will have to remain > theoretical for me. I'll find a different host for the VMs. I recently switched to the free ESXi and I like it a lot. The main problem with ESXi is the limited hardware support, I ended up replacing a few components of my server to be able to use ESXi. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2009-10-20 16:29:40
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Quoting Dominic Raferd <dl...@ed...>: >> Does anyone know if it is possible to run VMware Server on Devil-Linux >> (and thus use DL machine to host other vms)? If not, is there any other >> way to host VMs on DL? [I know it's regularly done the other way around >> (DL as a VM on a different host system.)] >> > It would only work with the server version of DL good this is the one I use > and you'd have to compile the vmware server modules within the build system. > oh dear, that's beyond me I think, I'm just a humble user > So in theory it should work. Thanks Heiko for the swift response but I guess it will have to remain theoretical for me. I'll find a different host for the VMs. Dominic |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2009-10-20 15:57:03
|
Quoting Dominic Raferd <dl...@ed...>: > Does anyone know if it is possible to run VMware Server on Devil-Linux > (and thus use DL machine to host other vms)? If not, is there any other > way to host VMs on DL? [I know it's regularly done the other way around > (DL as a VM on a different host system.)] It would only work with the server version of DL and you'd have to compile the vmware server modules within the build system. So in theory it should work. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2009-10-20 15:43:36
|
Does anyone know if it is possible to run VMware Server on Devil-Linux (and thus use DL machine to host other vms)? If not, is there any other way to host VMs on DL? [I know it's regularly done the other way around (DL as a VM on a different host system.)] Dominic |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2009-10-13 14:22:01
|
I would definitely go with the 1.4. We're really close to an official release, I just need some time (anyone wants to help?) to fix out the known problems. Heiko Quoting Frank Weis <Fra...@ct...>: > Hi all, > > I will shortly begin replacing 30+ firewalls with new hardware (NexCom > NSA 1042N8), and I wonder what release I should go for, 1.2.n or 1.4RCxx... > > I need: > > iptables > iptraf and ntop > syslog-ng > squid and squidguard > ipsec tunnels (*) > nagios/nrpe > snmpd > pptpd w/ plugin for LDAP authentication (**) > ntp > > > > (*) I haven't found a quick'n'dirty howto to migrate my configs to > racoon which seems to be in the 1.4 branch... pointers anyone? > (**) I currently do this with plugin winbind.so and the ntlm_auth > helper. If anyone has a better way, I'd be glad to hear it... > > > Thanks a lot in advance, > > > Frank > -- > _______________________________________________ > Centre de Technologie de l'Education > 29 avenue John F. Kennedy > L-1855 Luxembourg-Kirchberg > email: Fra...@ct... > tél.: +352 247-85973 > fax: +352 333797 > _______________________________________________ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Frank W. <Fra...@ct...> - 2009-10-13 14:12:39
|
Hi all, I will shortly begin replacing 30+ firewalls with new hardware (NexCom NSA 1042N8), and I wonder what release I should go for, 1.2.n or 1.4RCxx... I need: iptables iptraf and ntop syslog-ng squid and squidguard ipsec tunnels (*) nagios/nrpe snmpd pptpd w/ plugin for LDAP authentication (**) ntp (*) I haven't found a quick'n'dirty howto to migrate my configs to racoon which seems to be in the 1.4 branch... pointers anyone? (**) I currently do this with plugin winbind.so and the ntlm_auth helper. If anyone has a better way, I'd be glad to hear it... Thanks a lot in advance, Frank -- _______________________________________________ Centre de Technologie de l'Education 29 avenue John F. Kennedy L-1855 Luxembourg-Kirchberg email: Fra...@ct... tél.: +352 247-85973 fax: +352 333797 _______________________________________________ |
|
From: victor n. <vic...@ya...> - 2009-10-09 15:12:12
|
Thank you Victor ----- Original Message ---- From: Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...> To: dev...@li... Sent: Fri, October 9, 2009 9:27:36 AM Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] nmap crash in Devil-Linux 1.4RC1 Hey, Quoting victor nikiforenko <vic...@ya...>: > I'm testing a 1.4RC1 to replace a previous ver of Devil and when i > want to try ome utilities, i found whit nmap a folowing error: > > root@test:~ # nmap -v -A 172.26.110.12 > > Starting Nmap 4.76 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2009-10-06 10:25 COT > Initiating Ping Scan at 10:25 > Scanning 172.26.110.12 [2 ports] > nmap: timing.cc:333: void RateMeter::update(double, const timeval*): > Assertion `diff <= interval' failed. > Aborted Search the mailinglist archives for nmap related posts, I think that's a bug in nmap and we had a workaround for it. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Devil-linux-discuss mailing list Dev...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: victor n. <vic...@ya...> - 2009-10-09 15:10:38
|
Thank you. Victor ----- Original Message ---- From: Serge Leschinsky <fi...@in...> To: dev...@li... Sent: Fri, October 9, 2009 7:53:37 AM Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] strongswan in 1.4RC1 not found ??? Hello, it's some kind of developer's feature. It's full-functional, but disabled in the default config. I was going to verify that everything is OK and enable it. So, this package will be included into the next build (or you can build your own DL with strongswan). PS. I guess it's my fault, not yours. Sincerely, Serge victor nikiforenko wrote: > Hi, guys > > in my D-L box im trying 1.4RC1, whit the basic functions for firewalling is all ok, but in CHANGES-devil-linux-1.4RC1 i see the > - updated strongswan to 4.2.14 (sl). When i log in the box and try to setup it, i can't found no where ipsec command, /etc/ipsec.d and the other files related to it. > > I'm lost somwhere ? or use bad iso or somthing like that ? or is just a this release bug ? > > Please help > > Thanks > > Victor > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference _______________________________________________ Devil-linux-discuss mailing list Dev...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2009-10-09 14:27:55
|
Hey, Quoting victor nikiforenko <vic...@ya...>: > I'm testing a 1.4RC1 to replace a previous ver of Devil and when i > want to try ome utilities, i found whit nmap a folowing error: > > root@test:~ # nmap -v -A 172.26.110.12 > > Starting Nmap 4.76 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2009-10-06 10:25 COT > Initiating Ping Scan at 10:25 > Scanning 172.26.110.12 [2 ports] > nmap: timing.cc:333: void RateMeter::update(double, const timeval*): > Assertion `diff <= interval' failed. > Aborted Search the mailinglist archives for nmap related posts, I think that's a bug in nmap and we had a workaround for it. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2009-10-09 13:06:09
|
Bradlee Landis wrote: > What's the correct way to turn up the MTU on a network interface? The > default is 1500, so on a bonded gig interface, it does not really help > the speed above a single gig interface. I did not see the flag in > /etc/init.d/network , so is there somewhere else to set the default? > > I am still on Devil 1.2.15, unfortunately. > I'm not sure you are requesting about manual intervention, but I'd suggest adding the line below to the end of network script: ifconfig eth0 mtu 9000 9000 is a jumbo frame size, eth0/bond0 is your network interface Serge |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2009-10-09 12:56:33
|
Hello, it's some kind of developer's feature. It's full-functional, but disabled in the default config. I was going to verify that everything is OK and enable it. So, this package will be included into the next build (or you can build your own DL with strongswan). PS. I guess it's my fault, not yours. Sincerely, Serge victor nikiforenko wrote: > Hi, guys > > in my D-L box im trying 1.4RC1, whit the basic functions for firewalling is all ok, but in CHANGES-devil-linux-1.4RC1 i see the > - updated strongswan to 4.2.14 (sl). When i log in the box and try to setup it, i can't found no where ipsec command, /etc/ipsec.d and the other files related to it. > > I'm lost somwhere ? or use bad iso or somthing like that ? or is just a this release bug ? > > Please help > > Thanks > > Victor > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > |
|
From: victor n. <vic...@ya...> - 2009-10-08 16:28:00
|
Hi, guys
in my D-L box im trying 1.4RC1, whit the basic functions for firewalling is all ok, but in CHANGES-devil-linux-1.4RC1 i see the
- updated strongswan to 4.2.14 (sl). When i log in the box and try to setup it, i can't found no where ipsec command, /etc/ipsec.d and the other files related to it.
I'm lost somwhere ? or use bad iso or somthing like that ? or is just a this release bug ?
Please help
Thanks
Victor
|
|
From: Bradlee L. <bra...@gm...> - 2009-10-06 18:32:18
|
What's the correct way to turn up the MTU on a network interface? The default is 1500, so on a bonded gig interface, it does not really help the speed above a single gig interface. I did not see the flag in /etc/init.d/network , so is there somewhere else to set the default? I am still on Devil 1.2.15, unfortunately. Thanks, Brad Landis |
|
From: victor n. <vic...@ya...> - 2009-10-06 15:45:34
|
Hi All, I'm testing a 1.4RC1 to replace a previous ver of Devil and when i want to try ome utilities, i found whit nmap a folowing error: root@test:~ # nmap -v -A 172.26.110.12 Starting Nmap 4.76 ( http://nmap.org ) at 2009-10-06 10:25 COT Initiating Ping Scan at 10:25 Scanning 172.26.110.12 [2 ports] nmap: timing.cc:333: void RateMeter::update(double, const timeval*): Assertion `diff <= interval' failed. Aborted Regards Victor |
|
From: Moray M. <mmc...@ox...> - 2009-10-05 15:48:01
|
I use one of these boxes, albeit not for this purpose and am very happy with it and other stuff I've had from Tranquil. M. ------------------------------------- Moray McConnachie Director of IT +44 1865 261 600 Oxford Analytica http://www.oxan.com -----Original Message----- From: Dominic Raferd [mailto:dl...@ed...] Sent: 05 October 2009 15:50 To: dev...@li... Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Hardware suggestions (Digest, Vol 41, Issue 3) or http://www.tranquilpc-shop.co.uk/acatalog/T7_330_PC.html (also UK-based, uses Intel Atom 330 dual-core) Dominic Stephen H F Ralph wrote: > Gordon, > > We have used several fanless flash-based units from http://linitx.com/ > (based in the UK) - follow links to "Home <http://linitx.com/> | LEX > Embedded Systems <http://linitx.com/viewcategory.php?catid=116&pp=116> > | LIGHT <http://linitx.com/viewcategory.php?catid=118&pp=116,118>". > The fanless units are totally silent for home use. > > > We have also used a couple of their rack-mounted dual-motherboard > systems. We had one that got cooked, and learnt the hard way not to > sandwich them tightly between switches. Give them some air-flow and > they have been fine for us. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------ Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf _______________________________________________ Devil-linux-discuss mailing list Dev...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2009-10-05 14:50:27
|
or http://www.tranquilpc-shop.co.uk/acatalog/T7_330_PC.html (also UK-based, uses Intel Atom 330 dual-core) Dominic Stephen H F Ralph wrote: > Gordon, > > We have used several fanless flash-based units from http://linitx.com/ > (based in the UK) - follow links to "Home <http://linitx.com/> | LEX > Embedded Systems <http://linitx.com/viewcategory.php?catid=116&pp=116> > | LIGHT <http://linitx.com/viewcategory.php?catid=118&pp=116,118>". > The fanless units are totally silent for home use. > > > We have also used a couple of their rack-mounted dual-motherboard > systems. We had one that got cooked, and learnt the hard way not to > sandwich them tightly between switches. Give them some air-flow and > they have been fine for us. > |
|
From: Stephen H F R. <shf...@gm...> - 2009-10-05 13:46:48
|
Gordon, We have used several fanless flash-based units from http://linitx.com/(based in the UK) - follow links to " Home <http://linitx.com/> | LEX Embedded Systems<http://linitx.com/viewcategory.php?catid=116&pp=116>| LIGHT <http://linitx.com/viewcategory.php?catid=118&pp=116,118>". The fanless units are totally silent for home use. We have also used a couple of their rack-mounted dual-motherboard systems. We had one that got cooked, and learnt the hard way not to sandwich them tightly between switches. Give them some air-flow and they have been fine for us. Regards - Steve |
|
From: Marcello D. <mar...@st...> - 2009-10-04 09:56:33
|
I'm using several PC Engines' Alix2c3 cards. Very stable, cheap and fast. Now the alix3c3 has been superseded by alix2d3. Take a look at http://www.pcengines.ch/alix2d3.htm Marcello Il giorno ven, 02/10/2009 alle 13.32 -0400, Gordon Russell ha scritto: > Does anybody have suggestions for fanless boxes that they are running DL > on, and happy with? -- I've always run DL firewall on surplus desktop > hardware, but am looking to buy some fanless mini-itx or some such > devices, preferably w/ dual-nic but if not, then at least a pci slot to > accomodate additional nic(s). > > thanks for any pointers. > > Gordon > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Rowan S. <row...@ho...> - 2009-10-03 23:24:12
|
theres no need to buy a fan less box, just remove the fans you have, and drill extra holes all round. your power supply will always need a fan. i have a large tower case with a cooler master hyperz600 (any cpu cooler > 800g is a good cooler) which sits next to the power supply fan. i find a large case is cooler than a small one. on the top i have cut out holes and placed metal mesh on the top. i replaced the side door with metal mesh. i use a compact flash drive instead of a hard drive and i dont use a cd-rom drive, all that stuff is in another computer in the garage. the front of the case has everything removed and is covered with metal mesh, so the whole case breathes and the only fan is on the power supply which is pretty quiet. theres no really 100% fanless system unless you use a thin client which has no pci slots _________________________________________________________________ Search jobs from NZ's #1 job site 1000s of jobs online right now! http://clk.atdmt.com/NMN/go/157639089/direct/01/ |
|
From: Mike <Mi...@4a...> - 2009-10-03 00:41:35
|
Gordon, I've been using this box from CyberTron: http://www.cybertronpc.com/Customkititems~kc~PCSERQPLXL1010~PCc~SERVERS.htm <http://www.cybertronpc.com/Customkititems%7Ekc%7EPCSERQPLXL1010%7EPCc%7ESERVERS.htm> But I now see they also offer an Atom based box: http://www.cybertronpc.com/Customkititems~kc~SVQXT1020~PCc~SERVERS.htm <http://www.cybertronpc.com/Customkititems%7Ekc%7ESVQXT1020%7EPCc%7ESERVERS.htm> Great boxes, from SuperMicro at a great price. I have Devil on one and pfSense on two others with out any hitches. Mike Gordon Russell wrote: > Does anybody have suggestions for fanless boxes that they are running DL > on, and happy with? -- I've always run DL firewall on surplus desktop > hardware, but am looking to buy some fanless mini-itx or some such > devices, preferably w/ dual-nic but if not, then at least a pci slot to > accomodate additional nic(s). > > thanks for any pointers. > > Gordon > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Come build with us! The BlackBerry® Developer Conference in SF, CA > is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your > developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay > ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9-12, 2009. Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconf > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > > |
|
From: Gordon R. <ru...@cl...> - 2009-10-02 18:26:47
|
Does anybody have suggestions for fanless boxes that they are running DL on, and happy with? -- I've always run DL firewall on surplus desktop hardware, but am looking to buy some fanless mini-itx or some such devices, preferably w/ dual-nic but if not, then at least a pci slot to accomodate additional nic(s). thanks for any pointers. Gordon |
|
From: KyleJHarper <ky...@ca...> - 2009-10-01 17:49:19
|
For as much help as you and the Devil project have been I'd be glad to help out with keeping documents updated. I've sent you a private message with my email address if you'd like a hand. As for the TOMOYO stuff, it wasn't fixed for me in the grsecurity file. I always run an update script I made that checks out the latest from CVS and runs update_src; a fixed grsecurity wasn't in there. If it IS in there perhaps I have my CVS checkout command wrong. In either case let me know :) Thanks, Kyle -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Prepare-getting-error-in-fixdep.c-tp25619820p25703606.html Sent from the devil-linux-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
50 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
