Menu
▾
▴
devil-linux-discuss — General Mailing List for all discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(21) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(58) |
Nov
(75) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(101) |
Mar
(103) |
Apr
(125) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(62) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(214) |
Nov
(290) |
Dec
(274) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(187) |
Feb
(172) |
Mar
(313) |
Apr
(209) |
May
(169) |
Jun
(147) |
Jul
(118) |
Aug
(193) |
Sep
(227) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(246) |
Dec
(191) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(244) |
Feb
(175) |
Mar
(165) |
Apr
(130) |
May
(217) |
Jun
(122) |
Jul
(188) |
Aug
(235) |
Sep
(165) |
Oct
(133) |
Nov
(209) |
Dec
(88) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(108) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(122) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(42) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(151) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(72) |
Jul
(73) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(40) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
|
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
|
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Christopher C. M. <chr...@tu...> - 2010-02-24 18:25:57
|
Thank you, Serge. I will be certain too... On 2/24/2010 3:44 AM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: > Christopher, > > > I've added "condition" module to DL (with a bunch of other modules from > xtables-addons). Hopefully, it works. I made only several trivial tests, so I > can not guarantee that it works correctly. I'll be included into the next DL > build. Please test. > > Sincerely, > Serge > > On 02/19/2010 09:01 PM, Christopher C. Mills wrote: > >> Thanks, Serge. Keep in mind this has been a part of DL for a while, so >> to exclude it is to break backward compatibility. Thanks for including >> it in your build. >> >> I am not certain how it is decided what goes into DL, so I am just going >> to state a case on the listserv and hope the right folks are listening. >> >> Here is why I think this should be included: >> >> 1. It is important to maintain backward compatibility, unless of >> course functionality is officially deprecated (usually with >> warning for a few releases prior). To not do this puts the user in >> the position of having to rewrite firewall rules on each release >> of DL. Since DL is primarily a firewall, it should support that >> functionality first and foremost. Certainly the collection of >> modules extending the rules of iptables should always be included. >> To not do this makes DL start to gravitate to becoming something >> other than a firewall. >> 2. ipt_condition is a powerful module which allows dynamic changes to >> firewall rules without changing the rules themselves. It allows >> you to keep one rules file which is always in effect. This allows >> an iptables counter listing that remains static and >> understandable. It makes for an extremely clean set of firewall >> rules. Clean, understandable firewall rules are vital when coding >> a firewall. It is an important module, though most people don't >> understand it. >> >> Please understand I think you guys have done a wonderful job and I love >> this distribution. I am glad your are still going strong. No criticisms >> are implied here, just an opinion. >> >> Thanks for your great efforts and for a great distribution. >> >> On 2/17/2010 11:05 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: >> >>> Christopher, >>> >>> The module is not a part of iptables, but it's a part of pom - >>> http://www.netfilter.org/projects/patch-o-matic/pom-external.html#pom-external-condition >>> >>> So, the answer to your question - it's not a bug. It's the missing feature :) >>> >>> I'll try to build it with DL. Unfortunately my build environment is extremely >>> far from official, so it can be a problem. >>> >>> Serge >>> >>> >>> On 02/17/2010 05:03 PM, Christopher C. Mills wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Thank you, Serge! >>>> >>>> On 2/17/2010 4:59 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Christopher, >>>>> >>>>> I made a quick search thru iptables 1.4.6 source code and didn't find it. This >>>>> is the reason why I was asking you. >>>>> Well, I'm going to find out where the module lives and inform you about it. >>>>> >>>>> Serge >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 02/17/2010 12:50 AM, Christopher C. Mills wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, thanks for your reply. >>>>>> >>>>>> All I can say is it is covered in the man page, and I have been using it >>>>>> for years. I don't know what constitutes basic. You certainly have to >>>>>> explicitly load it with modprobe in order to use it. This is what is >>>>>> failing; the module isn't being found. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2/16/2010 8:35 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> Christopher, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> is it a module from basic iptables package or it's an extension? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Serge >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 02/16/2010 04:31 PM, Christopher C. Mills wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> My firewall depends on this module (ipt_condition) so I was wondering >>>>>>>> whether it was intentionally removed from Devil Linux or this is a bug? >>>>>>>> Does anyone know? >>>>>>>> On 2/16/2010 5:23 AM, Christopher Mills wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Is this a bug? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>>> SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, >>>>>>>>> Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW >>>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >>>>>>>>> Dev...@li... >>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, >>>>>>>> Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW >>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >>>>>>>> Dev...@li... >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > |
|
From: Frank W. <Fra...@ct...> - 2010-02-24 15:58:44
|
Hi, and thanks. Yes, I already had CONFIG_ETCFS=AUFS. I restarted a fresh build just now with everything on '586'. We'll see tomorrow if it works out. Regards, Frank Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Quoting Frank Weis <Fra...@ct...>: > >> Heiko Zuerker wrote: >>> Quoting Frank Weis <Fra...@ct...>: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have tested 1.4RC3-2010-01-14 and I have grown quite fond of it... >>>> >>>> Now that I wanted to move on and deploy it, I find out that I have 35 >>>> appliances with Pentium M CPUs, and that DL won't boot on them..... >>>> >>>> What can I do to fix this? I suppose that this isn't a boot option but >>>> hardwired in the kernel at compile-time? >>> I think there is, but I wouldn't worry about it. >>> You're compiling DL yourself, right? If yes, then use the i586 version. >>> If not, I just screwed up my build machine and it may be a few days >>> before I can provide you a new compile. >>> >> >> Thanks Heiko, >> >> I have built my own, but: >> >> *) choosing 586 for the kernel CPU doesn't cut it: PAE gets set in the >> kernel by the bigmem (64G) option in the kernel. I needed to go in there >> and chose maximum 4GB. > > This is the i586 kernel config: > # CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set > CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y > # CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set > > So you should be fine. > >> *) my dist still doesn't boot: >> >> it says: >> >> Version 1.4RC3-2010-02-24 >> Kernel 2.6.32.8-grsec >> Mounting SHM FS on /shm >> waiting until usb-storage driver has initialized all devices ... >> Creating devices in /dev >> >> Searching for configuration media >> Checking for "etc-mods.tar.bz2" on "/dev/hda2" ... success! >> loading configuration >> /load_modules: .: line 10: can't open '/shm/etc-mods/sysconfig/config' >> Searching for Devil-Linux CD-ROM >> Search list: /dev/hda >> checking /dev/hda mount failed >> checking /dev/hda2 ... wrong media >> checking /dev/hda1 ... media found >> mount: cannot setup loop device: No such file or directory >> Mounting SHM FS on /cdrom/shm >> mount: mounting /shm on /cdrom/shm failed: No such file or directory >> Unmounting proc >> Starting up final system... >> /init: line 482: can't open /cdrom/shm/dev/console: no such file >> Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! > > Do you have CONFIG_ETCFS=AUFS in your DL .config? If not, please set it. > >> when I start with an empty config partition, DL proposes to copy a >> default cfg to it and then it cannot find it.... >> >> What went wrong? >> >> Do I need to put 'Emulate CPU' and GCC cpu to 586 also? > > Yes I always set all 3 of them to i586, give that a try too. > -- _______________________________________________ Centre de Technologie de l'Education 29 avenue John F. Kennedy L-1855 Luxembourg-Kirchberg email: Fra...@ct... tél.: +352 247-85973 fax: +352 333797 _______________________________________________ |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2010-02-24 13:22:57
|
Quoting Frank Weis <Fra...@ct...>: > Heiko Zuerker wrote: >> Quoting Frank Weis <Fra...@ct...>: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have tested 1.4RC3-2010-01-14 and I have grown quite fond of it... >>> >>> Now that I wanted to move on and deploy it, I find out that I have 35 >>> appliances with Pentium M CPUs, and that DL won't boot on them..... >>> >>> What can I do to fix this? I suppose that this isn't a boot option but >>> hardwired in the kernel at compile-time? >> >> I think there is, but I wouldn't worry about it. >> You're compiling DL yourself, right? If yes, then use the i586 version. >> If not, I just screwed up my build machine and it may be a few days >> before I can provide you a new compile. >> > > > Thanks Heiko, > > I have built my own, but: > > *) choosing 586 for the kernel CPU doesn't cut it: PAE gets set in the > kernel by the bigmem (64G) option in the kernel. I needed to go in there > and chose maximum 4GB. This is the i586 kernel config: # CONFIG_NOHIGHMEM is not set CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G=y # CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G is not set So you should be fine. > *) my dist still doesn't boot: > > it says: > > Version 1.4RC3-2010-02-24 > Kernel 2.6.32.8-grsec > Mounting SHM FS on /shm > waiting until usb-storage driver has initialized all devices ... > Creating devices in /dev > > Searching for configuration media > Checking for "etc-mods.tar.bz2" on "/dev/hda2" ... success! > loading configuration > /load_modules: .: line 10: can't open '/shm/etc-mods/sysconfig/config' > Searching for Devil-Linux CD-ROM > Search list: /dev/hda > checking /dev/hda mount failed > checking /dev/hda2 ... wrong media > checking /dev/hda1 ... media found > mount: cannot setup loop device: No such file or directory > Mounting SHM FS on /cdrom/shm > mount: mounting /shm on /cdrom/shm failed: No such file or directory > Unmounting proc > Starting up final system... > /init: line 482: can't open /cdrom/shm/dev/console: no such file > Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! Do you have CONFIG_ETCFS=AUFS in your DL .config? If not, please set it. > when I start with an empty config partition, DL proposes to copy a > default cfg to it and then it cannot find it.... > > What went wrong? > > Do I need to put 'Emulate CPU' and GCC cpu to 586 also? Yes I always set all 3 of them to i586, give that a try too. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Frank W. <Fra...@ct...> - 2010-02-24 13:08:33
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Quoting Frank Weis <Fra...@ct...>: > >> Hi, >> >> I have tested 1.4RC3-2010-01-14 and I have grown quite fond of it... >> >> Now that I wanted to move on and deploy it, I find out that I have 35 >> appliances with Pentium M CPUs, and that DL won't boot on them..... >> >> What can I do to fix this? I suppose that this isn't a boot option but >> hardwired in the kernel at compile-time? > > I think there is, but I wouldn't worry about it. > You're compiling DL yourself, right? If yes, then use the i586 version. > If not, I just screwed up my build machine and it may be a few days > before I can provide you a new compile. > Thanks Heiko, I have built my own, but: *) choosing 586 for the kernel CPU doesn't cut it: PAE gets set in the kernel by the bigmem (64G) option in the kernel. I needed to go in there and chose maximum 4GB. *) my dist still doesn't boot: it says: Version 1.4RC3-2010-02-24 Kernel 2.6.32.8-grsec Mounting SHM FS on /shm waiting until usb-storage driver has initialized all devices ... Creating devices in /dev Searching for configuration media Checking for "etc-mods.tar.bz2" on "/dev/hda2" ... success! loading configuration /load_modules: .: line 10: can't open '/shm/etc-mods/sysconfig/config' Searching for Devil-Linux CD-ROM Search list: /dev/hda checking /dev/hda mount failed checking /dev/hda2 ... wrong media checking /dev/hda1 ... media found mount: cannot setup loop device: No such file or directory Mounting SHM FS on /cdrom/shm mount: mounting /shm on /cdrom/shm failed: No such file or directory Unmounting proc Starting up final system... /init: line 482: can't open /cdrom/shm/dev/console: no such file Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! when I start with an empty config partition, DL proposes to copy a default cfg to it and then it cannot find it.... What went wrong? Do I need to put 'Emulate CPU' and GCC cpu to 586 also? Thanks a lot, Frank -- _______________________________________________ Centre de Technologie de l'Education 29 avenue John F. Kennedy L-1855 Luxembourg-Kirchberg email: Fra...@ct... tél.: +352 247-85973 fax: +352 333797 _______________________________________________ |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2010-02-24 10:44:33
|
Christopher, I've added "condition" module to DL (with a bunch of other modules from xtables-addons). Hopefully, it works. I made only several trivial tests, so I can not guarantee that it works correctly. I'll be included into the next DL build. Please test. Sincerely, Serge On 02/19/2010 09:01 PM, Christopher C. Mills wrote: > Thanks, Serge. Keep in mind this has been a part of DL for a while, so > to exclude it is to break backward compatibility. Thanks for including > it in your build. > > I am not certain how it is decided what goes into DL, so I am just going > to state a case on the listserv and hope the right folks are listening. > > Here is why I think this should be included: > > 1. It is important to maintain backward compatibility, unless of > course functionality is officially deprecated (usually with > warning for a few releases prior). To not do this puts the user in > the position of having to rewrite firewall rules on each release > of DL. Since DL is primarily a firewall, it should support that > functionality first and foremost. Certainly the collection of > modules extending the rules of iptables should always be included. > To not do this makes DL start to gravitate to becoming something > other than a firewall. > 2. ipt_condition is a powerful module which allows dynamic changes to > firewall rules without changing the rules themselves. It allows > you to keep one rules file which is always in effect. This allows > an iptables counter listing that remains static and > understandable. It makes for an extremely clean set of firewall > rules. Clean, understandable firewall rules are vital when coding > a firewall. It is an important module, though most people don't > understand it. > > Please understand I think you guys have done a wonderful job and I love > this distribution. I am glad your are still going strong. No criticisms > are implied here, just an opinion. > > Thanks for your great efforts and for a great distribution. > > On 2/17/2010 11:05 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: >> Christopher, >> >> The module is not a part of iptables, but it's a part of pom - >> http://www.netfilter.org/projects/patch-o-matic/pom-external.html#pom-external-condition >> >> So, the answer to your question - it's not a bug. It's the missing feature :) >> >> I'll try to build it with DL. Unfortunately my build environment is extremely >> far from official, so it can be a problem. >> >> Serge >> >> >> On 02/17/2010 05:03 PM, Christopher C. Mills wrote: >> >>> Thank you, Serge! >>> >>> On 2/17/2010 4:59 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: >>> >>>> Christopher, >>>> >>>> I made a quick search thru iptables 1.4.6 source code and didn't find it. This >>>> is the reason why I was asking you. >>>> Well, I'm going to find out where the module lives and inform you about it. >>>> >>>> Serge >>>> >>>> >>>> On 02/17/2010 12:50 AM, Christopher C. Mills wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi, thanks for your reply. >>>>> >>>>> All I can say is it is covered in the man page, and I have been using it >>>>> for years. I don't know what constitutes basic. You certainly have to >>>>> explicitly load it with modprobe in order to use it. This is what is >>>>> failing; the module isn't being found. >>>>> >>>>> On 2/16/2010 8:35 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Christopher, >>>>>> >>>>>> is it a module from basic iptables package or it's an extension? >>>>>> >>>>>> Serge >>>>>> >>>>>> On 02/16/2010 04:31 PM, Christopher C. Mills wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> My firewall depends on this module (ipt_condition) so I was wondering >>>>>>> whether it was intentionally removed from Devil Linux or this is a bug? >>>>>>> Does anyone know? >>>>>>> On 2/16/2010 5:23 AM, Christopher Mills wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is this a bug? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, >>>>>>>> Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW >>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >>>>>>>> Dev...@li... >>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>> SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, >>>>>>> Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW >>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >>>>>>> Dev...@li... >>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2010-02-22 14:07:11
|
Quoting Frank Weis <Fra...@ct...>: > Hi, > > I have tested 1.4RC3-2010-01-14 and I have grown quite fond of it... > > Now that I wanted to move on and deploy it, I find out that I have 35 > appliances with Pentium M CPUs, and that DL won't boot on them..... > > What can I do to fix this? I suppose that this isn't a boot option but > hardwired in the kernel at compile-time? I think there is, but I wouldn't worry about it. You're compiling DL yourself, right? If yes, then use the i586 version. If not, I just screwed up my build machine and it may be a few days before I can provide you a new compile. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. |
|
From: Frank W. <Fra...@ct...> - 2010-02-22 13:25:27
|
Hi, I have tested 1.4RC3-2010-01-14 and I have grown quite fond of it... Now that I wanted to move on and deploy it, I find out that I have 35 appliances with Pentium M CPUs, and that DL won't boot on them..... What can I do to fix this? I suppose that this isn't a boot option but hardwired in the kernel at compile-time? Thanks, Frank -- _______________________________________________ Centre de Technologie de l'Education 29 avenue John F. Kennedy L-1855 Luxembourg-Kirchberg email: Fra...@ct... tél.: +352 247-85973 fax: +352 333797 _______________________________________________ |
|
From: Christopher C. M. <chr...@tu...> - 2010-02-20 06:48:28
|
Thanks, Serge. Keep in mind this has been a part of DL for a while, so
to exclude it is to break backward compatibility. Thanks for including
it in your build.
I am not certain how it is decided what goes into DL, so I am just going
to state a case on the listserv and hope the right folks are listening.
Here is why I think this should be included:
1. It is important to maintain backward compatibility, unless of
course functionality is officially deprecated (usually with
warning for a few releases prior). To not do this puts the user in
the position of having to rewrite firewall rules on each release
of DL. Since DL is primarily a firewall, it should support that
functionality first and foremost. Certainly the collection of
modules extending the rules of iptables should always be included.
To not do this makes DL start to gravitate to becoming something
other than a firewall.
2. ipt_condition is a powerful module which allows dynamic changes to
firewall rules without changing the rules themselves. It allows
you to keep one rules file which is always in effect. This allows
an iptables counter listing that remains static and
understandable. It makes for an extremely clean set of firewall
rules. Clean, understandable firewall rules are vital when coding
a firewall. It is an important module, though most people don't
understand it.
Please understand I think you guys have done a wonderful job and I love
this distribution. I am glad your are still going strong. No criticisms
are implied here, just an opinion.
Thanks for your great efforts and for a great distribution.
On 2/17/2010 11:05 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote:
> Christopher,
>
> The module is not a part of iptables, but it's a part of pom -
> http://www.netfilter.org/projects/patch-o-matic/pom-external.html#pom-external-condition
>
> So, the answer to your question - it's not a bug. It's the missing feature :)
>
> I'll try to build it with DL. Unfortunately my build environment is extremely
> far from official, so it can be a problem.
>
> Serge
>
>
> On 02/17/2010 05:03 PM, Christopher C. Mills wrote:
>
>> Thank you, Serge!
>>
>> On 2/17/2010 4:59 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote:
>>
>>> Christopher,
>>>
>>> I made a quick search thru iptables 1.4.6 source code and didn't find it. This
>>> is the reason why I was asking you.
>>> Well, I'm going to find out where the module lives and inform you about it.
>>>
>>> Serge
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/17/2010 12:50 AM, Christopher C. Mills wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi, thanks for your reply.
>>>>
>>>> All I can say is it is covered in the man page, and I have been using it
>>>> for years. I don't know what constitutes basic. You certainly have to
>>>> explicitly load it with modprobe in order to use it. This is what is
>>>> failing; the module isn't being found.
>>>>
>>>> On 2/16/2010 8:35 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Christopher,
>>>>>
>>>>> is it a module from basic iptables package or it's an extension?
>>>>>
>>>>> Serge
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/16/2010 04:31 PM, Christopher C. Mills wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> My firewall depends on this module (ipt_condition) so I was wondering
>>>>>> whether it was intentionally removed from Devil Linux or this is a bug?
>>>>>> Does anyone know?
>>>>>> On 2/16/2010 5:23 AM, Christopher Mills wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this a bug?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
>>>>>>> Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW
>>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
>>>>>>> Dev...@li...
>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace,
>>>>>> Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW
>>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list
>>>>>> Dev...@li...
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
|
|
From: Christopher C. M. <chr...@tu...> - 2010-02-18 08:10:12
|
Thank you, Serge! On 2/17/2010 4:59 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: > Christopher, > > I made a quick search thru iptables 1.4.6 source code and didn't find it. This > is the reason why I was asking you. > Well, I'm going to find out where the module lives and inform you about it. > > Serge > > > On 02/17/2010 12:50 AM, Christopher C. Mills wrote: > >> Hi, thanks for your reply. >> >> All I can say is it is covered in the man page, and I have been using it >> for years. I don't know what constitutes basic. You certainly have to >> explicitly load it with modprobe in order to use it. This is what is >> failing; the module isn't being found. >> >> On 2/16/2010 8:35 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: >> >>> Christopher, >>> >>> is it a module from basic iptables package or it's an extension? >>> >>> Serge >>> >>> On 02/16/2010 04:31 PM, Christopher C. Mills wrote: >>> >>> >>>> My firewall depends on this module (ipt_condition) so I was wondering >>>> whether it was intentionally removed from Devil Linux or this is a bug? >>>> Does anyone know? >>>> On 2/16/2010 5:23 AM, Christopher Mills wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Is this a bug? >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, >>>>> Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW >>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >>>>> Dev...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, >>>> Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >>>> Dev...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> > |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2010-02-18 06:06:20
|
Christopher, The module is not a part of iptables, but it's a part of pom - http://www.netfilter.org/projects/patch-o-matic/pom-external.html#pom-external-condition So, the answer to your question - it's not a bug. It's the missing feature :) I'll try to build it with DL. Unfortunately my build environment is extremely far from official, so it can be a problem. Serge On 02/17/2010 05:03 PM, Christopher C. Mills wrote: > Thank you, Serge! > > On 2/17/2010 4:59 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: >> Christopher, >> >> I made a quick search thru iptables 1.4.6 source code and didn't find it. This >> is the reason why I was asking you. >> Well, I'm going to find out where the module lives and inform you about it. >> >> Serge >> >> >> On 02/17/2010 12:50 AM, Christopher C. Mills wrote: >> >>> Hi, thanks for your reply. >>> >>> All I can say is it is covered in the man page, and I have been using it >>> for years. I don't know what constitutes basic. You certainly have to >>> explicitly load it with modprobe in order to use it. This is what is >>> failing; the module isn't being found. >>> >>> On 2/16/2010 8:35 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: >>> >>>> Christopher, >>>> >>>> is it a module from basic iptables package or it's an extension? >>>> >>>> Serge >>>> >>>> On 02/16/2010 04:31 PM, Christopher C. Mills wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> My firewall depends on this module (ipt_condition) so I was wondering >>>>> whether it was intentionally removed from Devil Linux or this is a bug? >>>>> Does anyone know? >>>>> On 2/16/2010 5:23 AM, Christopher Mills wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Is this a bug? >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, >>>>>> Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW >>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >>>>>> Dev...@li... >>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, >>>>> Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW >>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >>>>> Dev...@li... >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> > > |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2010-02-18 00:00:12
|
Christopher, I made a quick search thru iptables 1.4.6 source code and didn't find it. This is the reason why I was asking you. Well, I'm going to find out where the module lives and inform you about it. Serge On 02/17/2010 12:50 AM, Christopher C. Mills wrote: > Hi, thanks for your reply. > > All I can say is it is covered in the man page, and I have been using it > for years. I don't know what constitutes basic. You certainly have to > explicitly load it with modprobe in order to use it. This is what is > failing; the module isn't being found. > > On 2/16/2010 8:35 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: >> Christopher, >> >> is it a module from basic iptables package or it's an extension? >> >> Serge >> >> On 02/16/2010 04:31 PM, Christopher C. Mills wrote: >> >>> My firewall depends on this module (ipt_condition) so I was wondering >>> whether it was intentionally removed from Devil Linux or this is a bug? >>> Does anyone know? >>> On 2/16/2010 5:23 AM, Christopher Mills wrote: >>> >>>> Is this a bug? >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, >>>> Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >>>> Dev...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >>>> >>>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, >>> Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >>> Dev...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >>> >>> >> > > |
|
From: Christopher C. M. <chr...@tu...> - 2010-02-17 09:51:05
|
Hi, thanks for your reply. All I can say is it is covered in the man page, and I have been using it for years. I don't know what constitutes basic. You certainly have to explicitly load it with modprobe in order to use it. This is what is failing; the module isn't being found. On 2/16/2010 8:35 PM, Serge Leschinsky wrote: > Christopher, > > is it a module from basic iptables package or it's an extension? > > Serge > > On 02/16/2010 04:31 PM, Christopher C. Mills wrote: > >> My firewall depends on this module (ipt_condition) so I was wondering >> whether it was intentionally removed from Devil Linux or this is a bug? >> Does anyone know? >> On 2/16/2010 5:23 AM, Christopher Mills wrote: >> >>> Is this a bug? >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, >>> Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >>> Dev...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >>> >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, >> Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >> >> > |
|
From: Serge L. <fi...@in...> - 2010-02-17 03:59:38
|
Christopher, is it a module from basic iptables package or it's an extension? Serge On 02/16/2010 04:31 PM, Christopher C. Mills wrote: > My firewall depends on this module (ipt_condition) so I was wondering > whether it was intentionally removed from Devil Linux or this is a bug? > Does anyone know? > On 2/16/2010 5:23 AM, Christopher Mills wrote: >> Is this a bug? >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, >> Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, > Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW > http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > |
|
From: Christopher C. M. <chr...@tu...> - 2010-02-17 02:18:31
|
My firewall depends on this module (ipt_condition) so I was wondering whether it was intentionally removed from Devil Linux or this is a bug? Does anyone know? On 2/16/2010 5:23 AM, Christopher Mills wrote: > Is this a bug? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > SOLARIS 10 is the OS for Data Centers - provides features such as DTrace, > Predictive Self Healing and Award Winning ZFS. Get Solaris 10 NOW > http://p.sf.net/sfu/solaris-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > |
|
From: Christopher M. <chr...@tu...> - 2010-02-16 14:11:06
|
Is this a bug? |
|
From: Markus W. <ml...@ir...> - 2010-02-09 10:42:43
|
James, On Mon, 08 Feb 2010 at 05:58:03PM -0500, James Kessler wrote: > Thank you very much. This all seems clear, however I am receiving errors > when attempting to SEND email now using postfix. which errors exactly? Do you have an example from the logfile? And: from where do you want to send? From the Postfix server itself and/or from other clients in your network which want to use the Postfix server as an outgoing relay? Are they allowed to send (mynetworks)? Maybe you also could provide the output of postconf -n? Regards, Markus |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2010-02-09 09:34:38
|
to get information from postfix about your settings, try: postfix check 2>&1| grep -v "not owned" and look at recent log messages (e.g. after trying to send an email): cat /dev/vcs10 | grep postfix or my DL page http://www.edendevelopments.co.uk/dlsetup#postfix might help Dominic James Kessler wrote: > Thank you very much. This all seems clear, however I am receiving errors > when attempting to SEND email now using postfix. I was wondering if > maybe you could give a quick overview of how so that I can check my > settings? I appreciate any help. > > On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Markus Winkler <ml...@ir... > <mailto:ml...@ir...>> wrote: > > On 04.02.2010 23:08 James Kessler wrote: > > > > Postfix to send outgoing emailing messages, however I wish to disable > > the ability to receive messages. So in essence I would like to enable > > outgoing and disable incoming messaging. After reading the config > file I > > am a little confused with how to disable incoming messages. > > As Gordon wrote you can block incoming traffic to port 25 via netfilter > or an external firewall. That's one possible solution. > > But also with Postfix itself this is no problem. Postfix only accepts > incoming mail for domains which are listed in either (parameters in > main.cf <http://main.cf>): > > - mydestination > - relay_domains > - virtual_alias_domains > > If there are no domains and/or hostnames listed, then Postfix will > reject all incoming e-mails. You can verify the current effective > settings via 'postconf -n'. > > It depends on your environment which is the better solution for you. > > Regards, > Markus > > > -- > James E. Kessler > 6185 Lake Waldon Drive > Clarkston, MI, 48346 > |
|
From: James K. <jke...@gm...> - 2010-02-08 22:58:10
|
Thank you very much. This all seems clear, however I am receiving errors when attempting to SEND email now using postfix. I was wondering if maybe you could give a quick overview of how so that I can check my settings? I appreciate any help. On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Markus Winkler <ml...@ir...> wrote: > On 04.02.2010 23:08 James Kessler wrote: > > > > Postfix to send outgoing emailing messages, however I wish to disable > > the ability to receive messages. So in essence I would like to enable > > outgoing and disable incoming messaging. After reading the config file I > > am a little confused with how to disable incoming messages. > > As Gordon wrote you can block incoming traffic to port 25 via netfilter > or an external firewall. That's one possible solution. > > But also with Postfix itself this is no problem. Postfix only accepts > incoming mail for domains which are listed in either (parameters in > main.cf): > > - mydestination > - relay_domains > - virtual_alias_domains > > If there are no domains and/or hostnames listed, then Postfix will > reject all incoming e-mails. You can verify the current effective > settings via 'postconf -n'. > > It depends on your environment which is the better solution for you. > > Regards, > Markus > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation > Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the > business > Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts > Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > -- James E. Kessler 6185 Lake Waldon Drive Clarkston, MI, 48346 |
|
From: Markus W. <ml...@ir...> - 2010-02-05 08:50:21
|
On 04.02.2010 23:08 James Kessler wrote: > > Postfix to send outgoing emailing messages, however I wish to disable > the ability to receive messages. So in essence I would like to enable > outgoing and disable incoming messaging. After reading the config file I > am a little confused with how to disable incoming messages. As Gordon wrote you can block incoming traffic to port 25 via netfilter or an external firewall. That's one possible solution. But also with Postfix itself this is no problem. Postfix only accepts incoming mail for domains which are listed in either (parameters in main.cf): - mydestination - relay_domains - virtual_alias_domains If there are no domains and/or hostnames listed, then Postfix will reject all incoming e-mails. You can verify the current effective settings via 'postconf -n'. It depends on your environment which is the better solution for you. Regards, Markus |
|
From: Gordon R. <ru...@cl...> - 2010-02-05 08:08:28
|
A firewall rule that blocks inbound traffic on port 25 might be the most expedient way to achieve what you want Gordon ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Kessler" <jke...@gm...> To: dev...@li... Sent: Thursday, February 4, 2010 5:08:25 PM Subject: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Postfix Hello, I am currently using Devil Linux that boots from CD. I want to use Postfix to send outgoing emailing messages, however I wish to disable the ability to receive messages. So in essence I would like to enable outgoing and disable incoming messaging. After reading the config file I am a little confused with how to disable incoming messages. Any help would be welcome. Thanks. -- James E. Kessler ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Devil-linux-discuss mailing list Dev...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: James K. <jke...@gm...> - 2010-02-04 22:08:32
|
Hello, I am currently using Devil Linux that boots from CD. I want to use Postfix to send outgoing emailing messages, however I wish to disable the ability to receive messages. So in essence I would like to enable outgoing and disable incoming messaging. After reading the config file I am a little confused with how to disable incoming messages. Any help would be welcome. Thanks. -- James E. Kessler |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2010-01-26 09:11:08
|
Sorry for posting a bit off-topic, but I thought many people who read this mailing list may be users of MySQL and therefore concerned for its future. There is an online petition against Oracle's capture of MySQL (as part of its proposed purchase of Sun) at http://www.helpmysql.org. It's organised by Michael "Monty" Widenius, the original creator of MySQL, and by adding your name to the petition you can do your bit for the most popular open source database. Dominic (who has no connection with Sun, Oracle, Monty Program AB etc etc) |
|
From: warptrosse <war...@gm...> - 2010-01-22 22:23:15
|
no that is wrong 1) nano /etc/fstab 2) save-config -d /dev/hdc -f /mnt/mydisk/config.tar.bz2 On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:17 PM, James Kessler <jke...@gm...> wrote: > I see. Should this not also work for my USB drive as well? This is what I > am getting when I attempt to mount there. Perhaps I am using the command > incorrectly? > > # save-config -d /etc/fstab -f /dev/sda1 > Configuration file device specified "/etc/fstab" no longer exists! > Run save-config again with "-s" switch to search for other locations. > > > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:08 PM, warptrosse <war...@gm...> wrote: > >> add your hard disk to /etc/fstab, then >> >> save-config -d <LOCATION> -f <CONFIG_SAVE_URL> >> >> regards >> >> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:00 PM, James Kessler <jke...@gm...>wrote: >> >>> Hello. >>> >>> I am currently using a computer that boots Devil Linux from CD. I would >>> like to know if there is a way to save-config mounted devices such as USB >>> drives and Hard Drives. I can mount both devices within Devil Linux without >>> issue, however I am unable to save those mounts using save-config. >>> >>> Is there a way this can be accomplished? Any help is welcome. Thank you. >>> >>> -- >>> James E. Kessler >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the >>> world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for >>> Conference >>> attendees to learn about information security's most important issues >>> through >>> interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established >>> companies. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >>> Dev...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> WARPTROSSE {The knowledge of a man belongs to all the humanity} >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the >> world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for >> Conference >> attendees to learn about information security's most important issues >> through >> interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established >> companies. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >> >> > > > -- > James E. Kessler > 6185 Lake Waldon Drive > Clarkston, MI, 48346 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the > world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for > Conference > attendees to learn about information security's most important issues > through > interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > -- WARPTROSSE {The knowledge of a man belongs to all the humanity} |
|
From: James K. <jke...@gm...> - 2010-01-22 22:17:19
|
I see. Should this not also work for my USB drive as well? This is what I am getting when I attempt to mount there. Perhaps I am using the command incorrectly? # save-config -d /etc/fstab -f /dev/sda1 Configuration file device specified "/etc/fstab" no longer exists! Run save-config again with "-s" switch to search for other locations. On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:08 PM, warptrosse <war...@gm...> wrote: > add your hard disk to /etc/fstab, then > > save-config -d <LOCATION> -f <CONFIG_SAVE_URL> > > regards > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:00 PM, James Kessler <jke...@gm...>wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> I am currently using a computer that boots Devil Linux from CD. I would >> like to know if there is a way to save-config mounted devices such as USB >> drives and Hard Drives. I can mount both devices within Devil Linux without >> issue, however I am unable to save those mounts using save-config. >> >> Is there a way this can be accomplished? Any help is welcome. Thank you. >> >> -- >> James E. Kessler >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the >> world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for >> Conference >> attendees to learn about information security's most important issues >> through >> interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established >> companies. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >> >> > > > -- > WARPTROSSE {The knowledge of a man belongs to all the humanity} > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the > world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for > Conference > attendees to learn about information security's most important issues > through > interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > -- James E. Kessler 6185 Lake Waldon Drive Clarkston, MI, 48346 |
|
From: warptrosse <war...@gm...> - 2010-01-22 22:08:16
|
add your hard disk to /etc/fstab, then save-config -d <LOCATION> -f <CONFIG_SAVE_URL> regards On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:00 PM, James Kessler <jke...@gm...> wrote: > Hello. > > I am currently using a computer that boots Devil Linux from CD. I would > like to know if there is a way to save-config mounted devices such as USB > drives and Hard Drives. I can mount both devices within Devil Linux without > issue, however I am unable to save those mounts using save-config. > > Is there a way this can be accomplished? Any help is welcome. Thank you. > > -- > James E. Kessler > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Throughout its 18-year history, RSA Conference consistently attracts the > world's best and brightest in the field, creating opportunities for > Conference > attendees to learn about information security's most important issues > through > interactions with peers, luminaries and emerging and established companies. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsaconf-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > -- WARPTROSSE {The knowledge of a man belongs to all the humanity} |
50 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
