Menu
▾
▴
devil-linux-discuss — General Mailing List for all discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(21) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(58) |
Nov
(75) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(101) |
Mar
(103) |
Apr
(125) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(62) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(214) |
Nov
(290) |
Dec
(274) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(187) |
Feb
(172) |
Mar
(313) |
Apr
(209) |
May
(169) |
Jun
(147) |
Jul
(118) |
Aug
(193) |
Sep
(227) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(246) |
Dec
(191) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(244) |
Feb
(175) |
Mar
(165) |
Apr
(130) |
May
(217) |
Jun
(122) |
Jul
(188) |
Aug
(235) |
Sep
(165) |
Oct
(133) |
Nov
(209) |
Dec
(88) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(108) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(122) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(42) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(151) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(72) |
Jul
(73) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(40) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
|
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
|
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: jazz <jaz...@gm...> - 2011-06-14 01:45:32
|
in your previous email you stated that you use a 512tmb compact flash card, when i look at the used size on my flash stick the installation is 464mb. knowing a 512 cf card is more closely to 500mb or even a bit less, it not has that much headroom. So i can imagine you truly run out of space Dominic has helped me very well with setting up my DL system, and i must say that i'm very happy with my dl server best regards Gudy, Saigon On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 22:39:52 +0700, <gd...@tx...> wrote: > OK, I just tried the obvious (using install-on-usb without chrooting > first) and it worked. > SORRY ! > > Gary Stewart > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content > authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image > Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2011-06-13 16:28:19
|
I posted suggested extra code (3 lines) on Mantis... On 13/06/2011 17:02, Dominic Raferd wrote: > Yes I think this script cannot work if you are chroot'ed, maybe we could > alter it to check for that first? > > Dominic > > On 13/06/2011 16:52, gd...@tx... wrote: >> Hi Dominic, >> >> Before reading my emails I tried the (blindingly) obvious and ran >> install-on-usb without chrooting first and it seems to have worked. >> I did get a warning message from Debian that I was low on disk space >> which is highly unlikely because I am using an 512 MB CompactFlash. >> I've seen this before and believe it is some kind of partition >> problem but i don't remember exactly what I did to fix it. Anyway, >> thanks for your quick reply. >> >> Gary Stewart >> >> >> >> ---- Dominic Raferd<dl...@ed...> wrote: >>> I suggest you run install-on-usb from the directory that contains the >>> bootcd.iso. It should then find the file and suggest it as the default >>> at the 'Enter DL source' prompt. >>> >>> Dominic >>> >>> On 13/06/2011 15:20, gd...@tx... wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> When running the install-on-usb script I get this message: >>>> >>>> install-on-usb >>>> ============== >>>> >>>> >>>> This will install the Devil Linux ISO image to a disk device (USB/SCSI/IDE) >>>> and make it bootable, assuming that your PC can boot this device. >>>> >>>> Select which bootloader you want to use [default 1]: >>>> 1) SysLinux >>>> 2) SysLinux with serial console >>>> 3) Grub >>>> 4) Grub with serial console >>>> 5) Lilo (doesn't work yet) >>>> Choice: 4 >>>> >>>> Select Baud Rate for the serial console [default 1]: >>>> 1) 2400 >>>> 2) 4800 >>>> 3) 9600 >>>> 4) 19200 >>>> 5) 38400 >>>> 6) 57600 >>>> 7) 115200 >>>> Choice: 5 >>>> >>>> Enter DL source (DL image file or CD device) -> dist/devil-linux-1.4.3-2011-05-09-i686/bootcd.iso >>>> cat: /proc/mounts: No such file or directory >>>> Unsupported image format: >>>> Install failed! >>>> syncing and unmounting (this could take a while) >>>> >>>> The chroot /proc directory is completely empty (I assume this is where it is looking). I've tried >>>> running it from /build/data as well as /build/data/dist/devil-linux-1.4.3-2011-05-09-i686 with >>>> the same results. I've also tried running it with the CompactFlash device (using a CF to USB >>>> converter) mounted before chrooting after chrooting producing the same message. Once again this >>>> worked with my previous setup (Debian Etch 32 bit with the last 2.4 kernel version of Devil Linux) >>>> I am now building 1.4.3 installed on Debian Lenny (32 bit). >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Gary Stewart >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content >>>> authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image >>>> Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >>>> Dev...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content >>> authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image >>> Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >>> Dev...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content > authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image > Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2011-06-13 16:05:11
|
Yes I think this script cannot work if you are chroot'ed, maybe we could alter it to check for that first? Dominic On 13/06/2011 16:52, gd...@tx... wrote: > Hi Dominic, > > Before reading my emails I tried the (blindingly) obvious and ran > install-on-usb without chrooting first and it seems to have worked. > I did get a warning message from Debian that I was low on disk space > which is highly unlikely because I am using an 512 MB CompactFlash. > I've seen this before and believe it is some kind of partition > problem but i don't remember exactly what I did to fix it. Anyway, > thanks for your quick reply. > > Gary Stewart > > > > ---- Dominic Raferd<dl...@ed...> wrote: >> I suggest you run install-on-usb from the directory that contains the >> bootcd.iso. It should then find the file and suggest it as the default >> at the 'Enter DL source' prompt. >> >> Dominic >> >> On 13/06/2011 15:20, gd...@tx... wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> When running the install-on-usb script I get this message: >>> >>> install-on-usb >>> ============== >>> >>> >>> This will install the Devil Linux ISO image to a disk device (USB/SCSI/IDE) >>> and make it bootable, assuming that your PC can boot this device. >>> >>> Select which bootloader you want to use [default 1]: >>> 1) SysLinux >>> 2) SysLinux with serial console >>> 3) Grub >>> 4) Grub with serial console >>> 5) Lilo (doesn't work yet) >>> Choice: 4 >>> >>> Select Baud Rate for the serial console [default 1]: >>> 1) 2400 >>> 2) 4800 >>> 3) 9600 >>> 4) 19200 >>> 5) 38400 >>> 6) 57600 >>> 7) 115200 >>> Choice: 5 >>> >>> Enter DL source (DL image file or CD device) -> dist/devil-linux-1.4.3-2011-05-09-i686/bootcd.iso >>> cat: /proc/mounts: No such file or directory >>> Unsupported image format: >>> Install failed! >>> syncing and unmounting (this could take a while) >>> >>> The chroot /proc directory is completely empty (I assume this is where it is looking). I've tried >>> running it from /build/data as well as /build/data/dist/devil-linux-1.4.3-2011-05-09-i686 with >>> the same results. I've also tried running it with the CompactFlash device (using a CF to USB >>> converter) mounted before chrooting after chrooting producing the same message. Once again this >>> worked with my previous setup (Debian Etch 32 bit with the last 2.4 kernel version of Devil Linux) >>> I am now building 1.4.3 installed on Debian Lenny (32 bit). >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Gary Stewart >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content >>> authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image >>> Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >>> Dev...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content >> authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image >> Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > |
|
From: <gd...@tx...> - 2011-06-13 15:53:13
|
Hi Dominic, Before reading my emails I tried the (blindingly) obvious and ran install-on-usb without chrooting first and it seems to have worked. I did get a warning message from Debian that I was low on disk space which is highly unlikely because I am using an 512 MB CompactFlash. I've seen this before and believe it is some kind of partition problem but i don't remember exactly what I did to fix it. Anyway, thanks for your quick reply. Gary Stewart ---- Dominic Raferd <dl...@ed...> wrote: > I suggest you run install-on-usb from the directory that contains the > bootcd.iso. It should then find the file and suggest it as the default > at the 'Enter DL source' prompt. > > Dominic > > On 13/06/2011 15:20, gd...@tx... wrote: > > Hi, > > > > When running the install-on-usb script I get this message: > > > > install-on-usb > > ============== > > > > > > This will install the Devil Linux ISO image to a disk device (USB/SCSI/IDE) > > and make it bootable, assuming that your PC can boot this device. > > > > Select which bootloader you want to use [default 1]: > > 1) SysLinux > > 2) SysLinux with serial console > > 3) Grub > > 4) Grub with serial console > > 5) Lilo (doesn't work yet) > > Choice: 4 > > > > Select Baud Rate for the serial console [default 1]: > > 1) 2400 > > 2) 4800 > > 3) 9600 > > 4) 19200 > > 5) 38400 > > 6) 57600 > > 7) 115200 > > Choice: 5 > > > > Enter DL source (DL image file or CD device) -> dist/devil-linux-1.4.3-2011-05-09-i686/bootcd.iso > > cat: /proc/mounts: No such file or directory > > Unsupported image format: > > Install failed! > > syncing and unmounting (this could take a while) > > > > The chroot /proc directory is completely empty (I assume this is where it is looking). I've tried > > running it from /build/data as well as /build/data/dist/devil-linux-1.4.3-2011-05-09-i686 with > > the same results. I've also tried running it with the CompactFlash device (using a CF to USB > > converter) mounted before chrooting after chrooting producing the same message. Once again this > > worked with my previous setup (Debian Etch 32 bit with the last 2.4 kernel version of Devil Linux) > > I am now building 1.4.3 installed on Debian Lenny (32 bit). > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gary Stewart > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content > > authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image > > Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev > > _______________________________________________ > > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > > Dev...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content > authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image > Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: <gd...@tx...> - 2011-06-13 15:41:02
|
OK, I just tried the obvious (using install-on-usb without chrooting first) and it worked. SORRY ! Gary Stewart |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2011-06-13 15:09:02
|
I suggest you run install-on-usb from the directory that contains the bootcd.iso. It should then find the file and suggest it as the default at the 'Enter DL source' prompt. Dominic On 13/06/2011 15:20, gd...@tx... wrote: > Hi, > > When running the install-on-usb script I get this message: > > install-on-usb > ============== > > > This will install the Devil Linux ISO image to a disk device (USB/SCSI/IDE) > and make it bootable, assuming that your PC can boot this device. > > Select which bootloader you want to use [default 1]: > 1) SysLinux > 2) SysLinux with serial console > 3) Grub > 4) Grub with serial console > 5) Lilo (doesn't work yet) > Choice: 4 > > Select Baud Rate for the serial console [default 1]: > 1) 2400 > 2) 4800 > 3) 9600 > 4) 19200 > 5) 38400 > 6) 57600 > 7) 115200 > Choice: 5 > > Enter DL source (DL image file or CD device) -> dist/devil-linux-1.4.3-2011-05-09-i686/bootcd.iso > cat: /proc/mounts: No such file or directory > Unsupported image format: > Install failed! > syncing and unmounting (this could take a while) > > The chroot /proc directory is completely empty (I assume this is where it is looking). I've tried > running it from /build/data as well as /build/data/dist/devil-linux-1.4.3-2011-05-09-i686 with > the same results. I've also tried running it with the CompactFlash device (using a CF to USB > converter) mounted before chrooting after chrooting producing the same message. Once again this > worked with my previous setup (Debian Etch 32 bit with the last 2.4 kernel version of Devil Linux) > I am now building 1.4.3 installed on Debian Lenny (32 bit). > > Thanks, > > Gary Stewart > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content > authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image > Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > |
|
From: <gd...@tx...> - 2011-06-13 14:21:49
|
Hi, When running the install-on-usb script I get this message: install-on-usb ============== This will install the Devil Linux ISO image to a disk device (USB/SCSI/IDE) and make it bootable, assuming that your PC can boot this device. Select which bootloader you want to use [default 1]: 1) SysLinux 2) SysLinux with serial console 3) Grub 4) Grub with serial console 5) Lilo (doesn't work yet) Choice: 4 Select Baud Rate for the serial console [default 1]: 1) 2400 2) 4800 3) 9600 4) 19200 5) 38400 6) 57600 7) 115200 Choice: 5 Enter DL source (DL image file or CD device) -> dist/devil-linux-1.4.3-2011-05-09-i686/bootcd.iso cat: /proc/mounts: No such file or directory Unsupported image format: Install failed! syncing and unmounting (this could take a while) The chroot /proc directory is completely empty (I assume this is where it is looking). I've tried running it from /build/data as well as /build/data/dist/devil-linux-1.4.3-2011-05-09-i686 with the same results. I've also tried running it with the CompactFlash device (using a CF to USB converter) mounted before chrooting after chrooting producing the same message. Once again this worked with my previous setup (Debian Etch 32 bit with the last 2.4 kernel version of Devil Linux) I am now building 1.4.3 installed on Debian Lenny (32 bit). Thanks, Gary Stewart |
|
From: Chris G. <dl...@ki...> - 2011-06-05 17:21:41
|
Thanks Heiko, guess I'd better upgrade my server to 1.4.2 then. Regards, Chris. -----Original Message----- From: Heiko Zuerker Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2011 1:52 PM To: dev...@li... Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Devil Linux Python Version. python -V Python 2.6.5 -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Grove [mailto:dl...@ki...] > Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 6:38 PM > To: dev...@li... > Subject: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Devil Linux Python Version. > > Hi guys. I know is a bit of a strange question, but as I can't find the answer via > Google I'll ask it anyway, what version of Python is bundled with 1.4.2? and if > it's below 2.6, how easy would it be to upgrade it? > Thanks, Chris. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with > vRanger. > Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe, > secure and there when you need it. Discover what all the cheering's about. > Get your free trial download today. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-dev2dev2 > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe, secure and there when you need it. Discover what all the cheering's about. Get your free trial download today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-dev2dev2 _______________________________________________ Devil-linux-discuss mailing list Dev...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-06-05 12:52:39
|
python -V Python 2.6.5 -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Grove [mailto:dl...@ki...] > Sent: Friday, June 03, 2011 6:38 PM > To: dev...@li... > Subject: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Devil Linux Python Version. > > Hi guys. I know is a bit of a strange question, but as I can't find the answer via > Google I'll ask it anyway, what version of Python is bundled with 1.4.2? and if > it's below 2.6, how easy would it be to upgrade it? > Thanks, Chris. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with > vRanger. > Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe, > secure and there when you need it. Discover what all the cheering's about. > Get your free trial download today. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-dev2dev2 > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Chris G. <dl...@ki...> - 2011-06-04 00:11:35
|
Hi guys. I know is a bit of a strange question, but as I can't find the answer via Google I'll ask it anyway, what version of Python is bundled with 1.4.2? and if it's below 2.6, how easy would it be to upgrade it? Thanks, Chris. |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2011-05-31 08:33:55
|
On 30/05/2011 15:32, Heiko Zuerker wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Heiko Zuerker [mailto:he...@zu...] >> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 1:36 PM >> To: dev...@li... >> Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] samba >> >> >> Quoting Heiko Zuerker<he...@zu...>: >> >>> Quoting Dominic Raferd<dl...@ed...>: >>>> On 11/05/2011 10:54, Dick Middleton wrote: >>>>> On 05/10/11 14:29, Dominic Raferd wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> To get samba working with DL 1.4.1 and higher I think you must add >>>>>> the following in /etc/samba/smb.conf: >>>>>> >>>>>> in [global] add: >>>>>> >>>>>> unix extensions = no >>>>>> >>>>>> add a new share: >>>>>> >>>>>> [IPC$] >>>>>> path = /shm/var/tmp >>>>>> wide links = yes >>>>>> >>>>>> and for each other share include the line: >>>>>> >>>>>> wide links = yes >>>>>> >>>>> What's offered here is OK but take care with these options: >>>>> >>>>> http://www.samba.org/samba/news/symlink_attack.html >>>>> >>>>> Dick >>>> Thanks Dick, my understanding is that using 'unix extensions = no' >>>> prevents this exploit (and samba no longer allows 'unix extensions = >>>> yes' with 'wide links = yes'). >>>> >>>> If anyone knows of another way to get samba working on DL (since >>>> 1.4.1), I would be pleased to hear it. >>> The only other way I can think of is what I started implementing for DL > 1.5. >>> It changes the folder structure a bit and uses "mount --bind" instead >>> of symlinks, which may resolve the need of "wide links". >>> >>> I'm not sure when I'd have time to look at this, but if anybody feels >>> like working it: >>> Look at the GIT repository under the target/Devil-Linux/default >>> directory for the scripts. >> I backported the "mount --bind" stuff from 1.5 and it's checked into CVS. >> I did not yet get a chance to verify samba now works without the wide > links. > > Seems like this didn't resolve the issue. > It would be great if somebody else could help investigate this issue, maybe > I missed something. > > I'm currently uploading the latest CVS release to the FTP server, I'll shoot > out an email once it's complete. I confirm that the new build does not resolve the fundamental samba issue, but the workaround is still okay. It is possible that Samba 3.6 will help, I see there is a change there (in 3.6.0rc1 source3/include/vfs_macros.h) to SMB_VFS_REALPATH code - which is where the problem lies (ref my posting here 21 Jan 2011). However a comment at http://www.faqs.org/docs/securing/chap29sec287.html (referring admittedly to a much older version of Samba) suggests that 'wide links = yes' speeds up Samba significantly. Dominic |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-05-30 17:42:33
|
Hi,
I uploaded the latest CVS build to the testing directory.
Please help test this version, so we can get ready for the official 1.4.3
--
Regards
Heiko Zuerker
<http://www.devil-linux.org> http://www.devil-linux.org
|
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-05-30 14:32:49
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: Heiko Zuerker [mailto:he...@zu...] > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 1:36 PM > To: dev...@li... > Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] samba > > > Quoting Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...>: > > > Quoting Dominic Raferd <dl...@ed...>: > >> On 11/05/2011 10:54, Dick Middleton wrote: > >>> On 05/10/11 14:29, Dominic Raferd wrote: > >>> > >>>> To get samba working with DL 1.4.1 and higher I think you must add > >>>> the following in /etc/samba/smb.conf: > >>>> > >>>> in [global] add: > >>>> > >>>> unix extensions = no > >>>> > >>>> add a new share: > >>>> > >>>> [IPC$] > >>>> path = /shm/var/tmp > >>>> wide links = yes > >>>> > >>>> and for each other share include the line: > >>>> > >>>> wide links = yes > >>>> > >>> What's offered here is OK but take care with these options: > >>> > >>> http://www.samba.org/samba/news/symlink_attack.html > >>> > >>> Dick > >> > >> Thanks Dick, my understanding is that using 'unix extensions = no' > >> prevents this exploit (and samba no longer allows 'unix extensions = > >> yes' with 'wide links = yes'). > >> > >> If anyone knows of another way to get samba working on DL (since > >> 1.4.1), I would be pleased to hear it. > > > > The only other way I can think of is what I started implementing for DL 1.5. > > It changes the folder structure a bit and uses "mount --bind" instead > > of symlinks, which may resolve the need of "wide links". > > > > I'm not sure when I'd have time to look at this, but if anybody feels > > like working it: > > Look at the GIT repository under the target/Devil-Linux/default > > directory for the scripts. > > I backported the "mount --bind" stuff from 1.5 and it's checked into CVS. > I did not yet get a chance to verify samba now works without the wide links. Seems like this didn't resolve the issue. It would be great if somebody else could help investigate this issue, maybe I missed something. I'm currently uploading the latest CVS release to the FTP server, I'll shoot out an email once it's complete. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-05-26 22:20:30
|
Hey,
Is anybody using frox?
It wasn't updated in several years and doesn't like the latest kernel
anymore.
--
Regards
Heiko Zuerker
<http://www.devil-linux.org> http://www.devil-linux.org
|
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-05-20 15:16:47
|
Hey, Can you use iptraf (already included) instead of iftop? -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Philippe Weill [mailto:Phi...@ae...] > Sent: Friday, May 20, 2011 9:06 AM > To: dev...@li... > Subject: [Devil-Linux-discuss] iftop and tcptraceroute on devil ? > > Hi > > It's possible to add two small tools to devil linux I would like to have iftop and > tcptraceroute > > Thanks in advance > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! > Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next- > generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran developers > boost performance applications - including clusters. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Philippe W. <Phi...@ae...> - 2011-05-20 14:18:57
|
Hi It's possible to add two small tools to devil linux I would like to have iftop and tcptraceroute Thanks in advance |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-05-20 12:43:10
|
> > I backported the "mount --bind" stuff from 1.5 and it's checked into CVS. > > I did not yet get a chance to verify samba now works without the wide > links. > > Thanks Heiko! I am happy to try it when there is a server build available. Are > the folder structure changes likely to break anything? The folder structure is pretty much the same, with the exception that some symlinks have been replaced by directories with a "mount --bind" over them back to the original symlink target (mostly under /shm/). It shouldn't break anything, but we'll have to test some more to make sure. I fixed all the pieces which I found breaking (like booting & upgrade-config). -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2011-05-20 11:32:59
|
On 19/05/2011 19:36, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Quoting Heiko Zuerker<he...@zu...>: > >> Quoting Dominic Raferd<dl...@ed...>: >>> On 11/05/2011 10:54, Dick Middleton wrote: >>>> On 05/10/11 14:29, Dominic Raferd wrote: >>>> >>>>> To get samba working with DL 1.4.1 and higher I think you must add the >>>>> following in /etc/samba/smb.conf: >>>>> >>>>> in [global] add: >>>>> >>>>> unix extensions = no >>>>> >>>>> add a new share: >>>>> >>>>> [IPC$] >>>>> path = /shm/var/tmp >>>>> wide links = yes >>>>> >>>>> and for each other share include the line: >>>>> >>>>> wide links = yes >>>>> >>>> What's offered here is OK but take care with these options: >>>> >>>> http://www.samba.org/samba/news/symlink_attack.html >>>> >>>> Dick >>> Thanks Dick, my understanding is that using 'unix extensions = no' >>> prevents this exploit (and samba no longer allows 'unix extensions = >>> yes' with 'wide links = yes'). >>> >>> If anyone knows of another way to get samba working on DL (since 1.4.1), >>> I would be pleased to hear it. >> The only other way I can think of is what I started implementing for DL 1.5. >> It changes the folder structure a bit and uses "mount --bind" instead >> of symlinks, which may resolve the need of "wide links". >> >> I'm not sure when I'd have time to look at this, but if anybody feels >> like working it: >> Look at the GIT repository under the target/Devil-Linux/default >> directory for the scripts. > I backported the "mount --bind" stuff from 1.5 and it's checked into CVS. > I did not yet get a chance to verify samba now works without the wide links. Thanks Heiko! I am happy to try it when there is a server build available. Are the folder structure changes likely to break anything? Dominic |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-05-19 19:04:04
|
Quoting Dominic Raferd <dl...@ed...>: > When I use wget on DL over a secure connection I always have to use > option "--no-check-certificate". I think this is because my DL doesn't > have any CA certificates in its store. > > Is there an 'approved' way to get and maintain the standard > ca-certificates for DL? The only advice I can find by googling relates > to other distros which already have the CA certificates (e.g. at > /usr/share/ca-certificates, with symlinks at /etc/ssl/certificates). I don't think we ever discussed this, so your suggestion sounds good to me. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-05-19 18:36:13
|
Quoting Heiko Zuerker <he...@zu...>: > Quoting Dominic Raferd <dl...@ed...>: >> On 11/05/2011 10:54, Dick Middleton wrote: >>> On 05/10/11 14:29, Dominic Raferd wrote: >>> >>>> To get samba working with DL 1.4.1 and higher I think you must add the >>>> following in /etc/samba/smb.conf: >>>> >>>> in [global] add: >>>> >>>> unix extensions = no >>>> >>>> add a new share: >>>> >>>> [IPC$] >>>> path = /shm/var/tmp >>>> wide links = yes >>>> >>>> and for each other share include the line: >>>> >>>> wide links = yes >>>> >>> What's offered here is OK but take care with these options: >>> >>> http://www.samba.org/samba/news/symlink_attack.html >>> >>> Dick >> >> Thanks Dick, my understanding is that using 'unix extensions = no' >> prevents this exploit (and samba no longer allows 'unix extensions = >> yes' with 'wide links = yes'). >> >> If anyone knows of another way to get samba working on DL (since 1.4.1), >> I would be pleased to hear it. > > The only other way I can think of is what I started implementing for DL 1.5. > It changes the folder structure a bit and uses "mount --bind" instead > of symlinks, which may resolve the need of "wide links". > > I'm not sure when I'd have time to look at this, but if anybody feels > like working it: > Look at the GIT repository under the target/Devil-Linux/default > directory for the scripts. I backported the "mount --bind" stuff from 1.5 and it's checked into CVS. I did not yet get a chance to verify samba now works without the wide links. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2011-05-19 10:30:25
|
When I use wget on DL over a secure connection I always have to use option "--no-check-certificate". I think this is because my DL doesn't have any CA certificates in its store. Is there an 'approved' way to get and maintain the standard ca-certificates for DL? The only advice I can find by googling relates to other distros which already have the CA certificates (e.g. at /usr/share/ca-certificates, with symlinks at /etc/ssl/certificates). Dominic |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-05-11 21:58:15
|
Quoting Dominic Raferd <dl...@ed...>: > On 11/05/2011 10:54, Dick Middleton wrote: >> On 05/10/11 14:29, Dominic Raferd wrote: >> >>> To get samba working with DL 1.4.1 and higher I think you must add the >>> following in /etc/samba/smb.conf: >>> >>> in [global] add: >>> >>> unix extensions = no >>> >>> add a new share: >>> >>> [IPC$] >>> path = /shm/var/tmp >>> wide links = yes >>> >>> and for each other share include the line: >>> >>> wide links = yes >>> >> What's offered here is OK but take care with these options: >> >> http://www.samba.org/samba/news/symlink_attack.html >> >> Dick > > Thanks Dick, my understanding is that using 'unix extensions = no' > prevents this exploit (and samba no longer allows 'unix extensions = > yes' with 'wide links = yes'). > > If anyone knows of another way to get samba working on DL (since 1.4.1), > I would be pleased to hear it. The only other way I can think of is what I started implementing for DL 1.5. It changes the folder structure a bit and uses "mount --bind" instead of symlinks, which may resolve the need of "wide links". I'm not sure when I'd have time to look at this, but if anybody feels like working it: Look at the GIT repository under the target/Devil-Linux/default directory for the scripts. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2011-05-11 10:15:31
|
On 11/05/2011 10:54, Dick Middleton wrote: > On 05/10/11 14:29, Dominic Raferd wrote: > >> To get samba working with DL 1.4.1 and higher I think you must add the >> following in /etc/samba/smb.conf: >> >> in [global] add: >> >> unix extensions = no >> >> add a new share: >> >> [IPC$] >> path = /shm/var/tmp >> wide links = yes >> >> and for each other share include the line: >> >> wide links = yes >> > What's offered here is OK but take care with these options: > > http://www.samba.org/samba/news/symlink_attack.html > > Dick Thanks Dick, my understanding is that using 'unix extensions = no' prevents this exploit (and samba no longer allows 'unix extensions = yes' with 'wide links = yes'). If anyone knows of another way to get samba working on DL (since 1.4.1), I would be pleased to hear it. Dominic |
|
From: Dick M. <di...@fo...> - 2011-05-11 09:54:33
|
On 05/10/11 14:29, Dominic Raferd wrote: > To get samba working with DL 1.4.1 and higher I think you must add the > following in /etc/samba/smb.conf: > > in [global] add: > > unix extensions = no > > add a new share: > > [IPC$] > path = /shm/var/tmp > wide links = yes > > and for each other share include the line: > > wide links = yes > What's offered here is OK but take care with these options: http://www.samba.org/samba/news/symlink_attack.html Dick |
|
From: Jazz C. <jaz...@gm...> - 2011-05-11 06:37:37
|
did you try the config file i've send you? with what results? wow :)))))))))))) its working of course I'm curios, how did you find it ? because i wend through the samba documentation of the samba website, it has soooooo many options, and many options are totally un-understandable for me(and i think for many people who try to configure samba the first time) and even with big distro's it isn't working the right way linux mint 10... kubuntu 10.10 livecd sms linux livecd worked well, but get it installed and working with raid1 is a crime :) ubuntu server edition(no livecd) so had to install it on a separate hd as installer not recognized partition type fd with software raid1, and the problem of 100x typing sudo and passwords to get basic things configured as root(no standard root account, very unhandy when you have to setup a server) I'm not a linux first timer, use linux already since 2006 with kde as favorite desktop, but never got this kind of problems,and never setup a server before # # Sample configuration file for the Samba suite for Debian GNU/Linux. #======================= Global Settings ======================= [global] workgroup = WORKGROUP server string = %h server dns proxy = no log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m max log size = 1000 syslog = 0 encrypt passwords = true passdb backend = tdbsam obey pam restrictions = yes unix password sync = yes # For Unix password sync to work on a Debian GNU/Linux system, the following # parameters must be set (thanks to Ian Kahan <<ka...@in...> for # sending the correct chat script for the passwd program in Debian Sarge). passwd program = /usr/bin/passwd %u passwd chat = *Enter\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n *Retype\snew\s*\spassword:* %n\n *password\supdated\ssuccessfully* . pam password change = yes [homes] comment = Home Directories browseable = no read only = yes create mask = 0700 directory mask = 0700 valid users = %S ;[profiles] ; comment = Users profiles ; path = /home/samba/profiles ; guest ok = no ; browseable = no ; create mask = 0600 ; directory mask = 0700 [printers] comment = All Printers browseable = no path = /var/spool/samba printable = yes guest ok = no read only = yes create mask = 0700 [print$] comment = Printer Drivers path = /var/lib/samba/printers browseable = yes read only = yes guest ok = no the above is on linux mint v10.....and don't works nearly the same in kubuntu as you see ...i tried many things.... if i get the basic running, then i can add specific configurations to fine tune the setup. but if the basic is not even running on many distro's, what is programmed by the real pro guru's, what can i do then.... :) by the way, i reported a shutdown bug at sourceforce if you run as root shutdown now -t secs:10 then you get a message for maintenance(type root password) or type control d to continue which neither work I thank you very very much with helping me to get this working some info about me, maybe nice to know for you I'm living in Saigon, (now hochiminh) vietnam I've a small coffee farm near dallat city (400km from saigon) as you can imagine to earn something from farming coffee alone is very hard as you only get 1 harvest / year that's why i have another tiny company in saigon (maintenance and sales of medical equipment and laboratory analyzers) and i produce plastic bags for fashion shops, nice, good quality, beautiful bags, 100% customised, small batches only So now not think i'm rich...because i can even not buy a second hand car from all this work as inflation is very high here (febuary 2011, until now, 32% inflation) But i enjoy my very busy life...days are tooo short :) if you enjoy coffee...let me know what type you like (vienamese coffee is strong, maybe you have to dillute it) we have 30..50 differend tastes of coffee here and it will be a pleasure for me to send some for you best regards Gudy On 5/10/11, Dominic Raferd <dl...@ed...> wrote: > Gudy: > > To get samba working with DL 1.4.1 and higher I think you must add the > following in /etc/samba/smb.conf: > > in [global] add: > > unix extensions = no > > add a new share: > > [IPC$] > path = /shm/var/tmp > wide links = yes > > and for each other share include the line: > > wide links = yes > > I have now updated http://www.edendevelopments.co.uk/dlsetup to reflect > this. > > Dominic > > On 09/05/2011 14:14, gudy wrote: >> I like to request some help with configuring samba on dl 1.4.2 i686 >> server. >> as i followed all the instructions on >> http://www.edendevelopments.co.uk/dlsetup >> except workgroup=WORKGROUP >> but i can't get access to the dl samba server from winxp pc's >> dl samba server shows up in workgroup, but access not allowed, ask your >> admin.... >> has anyone dl running with samba? >> is there something i have overlooked? >> >> pls help, i have no clues >> >> Gudy ,Saigon Vietnam > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability > What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. > Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools > to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > |
50 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
