Menu
▾
▴
devil-linux-discuss — General Mailing List for all discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(21) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(58) |
Nov
(75) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(101) |
Mar
(103) |
Apr
(125) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(62) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(214) |
Nov
(290) |
Dec
(274) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(187) |
Feb
(172) |
Mar
(313) |
Apr
(209) |
May
(169) |
Jun
(147) |
Jul
(118) |
Aug
(193) |
Sep
(227) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(246) |
Dec
(191) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(244) |
Feb
(175) |
Mar
(165) |
Apr
(130) |
May
(217) |
Jun
(122) |
Jul
(188) |
Aug
(235) |
Sep
(165) |
Oct
(133) |
Nov
(209) |
Dec
(88) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(108) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(122) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(42) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(151) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(72) |
Jul
(73) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(40) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
|
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
|
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Chris G. <dl...@ki...> - 2011-11-01 20:14:23
|
Hi Serge Right the folder I want to export is /home/Films so I've put it in /etc/exports Next I've done /etc/init.d/portmap start as I got a "No such file or directory" for the other one and I've got an [OK] for that. Next I did the /etc/init.d/nfsd start and got the following: Starting NFS mountd... [ OK ] Starting NFS nfsd...rpc.nfsd: version 4 requires the TCP protocol [ OK ] Starting NFS statd... [ OK ] Mounting nfsd virtual filesystem...mount: none already mounted or /proc/fs/nfsd busy mount: according to mtab, none is already mounted on /proc/fs/nfsd [FAILED] Exporting NFS Filesystems... [ OK ] When I did showmount -e nfs.server.ip.address I got: clnt_create: RPC: Unknown protocol I did a /etc/init.d/nfsd restart just in case and got: Stopping NFS statd... Not running [ ATTN ] Stopping NFS nfsd... Not running [ ATTN ] Stopping NFS mountd... Not running [ ATTN ] Refreshing NFS Exported Filesystems... [ OK ] Unmounting NFS Virtual Filesystem... [ OK ] Starting NFS mountd... [ OK ] Starting NFS nfsd...rpc.nfsd: version 4 requires the TCP protocol [ OK ] Starting NFS statd... [ OK ] Mounting nfsd virtual filesystem... [ OK ] Exporting NFS Filesystems... [ OK ] But I still get the same clnt_create: RPC: Unknown protocol error. Not sure where to go next :( Thanks, Chris. On 1 November 2011 20:00, Serge Leschinsky <ser...@gm...>wrote: > Hi Chris, > > It works. Let's assume you are going to share "/opt", so the only things > you > have to do are: > > 1. echo "/opt *(rw,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check)" > /etc/exports > > 2. /etc/init.d/rpcbind start > (or if you use older version /etc/init.d/portmap start) > > 3. /etc/init.d/nfsd start > > 4. check if "/opt" was really exported > showmount -e nfs.server.ip.address > > > If it doesn't work, let's debug it. > > Serge > > > On 11/01/2011 04:52 AM, Chris Grove wrote: > > Hi All. > > Now I'm sure I'm just being thick (like I was with the bridging network > > interfaces), but I can't seem to work out how to setup NFS Shares on my > DL > > server. So first off, can this be done? and secondly can someone give me > an > > Idiots Guide on how to do it please? > > Thanks in advance, Chris. > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > RSA® Conference 2012 > > Save$700 by Nov 18 > > Register now > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > > Dev...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA® Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > |
|
From: Serge L. <ser...@gm...> - 2011-11-01 20:00:45
|
Hi Chris, It works. Let's assume you are going to share "/opt", so the only things you have to do are: 1. echo "/opt *(rw,no_root_squash,no_subtree_check)" > /etc/exports 2. /etc/init.d/rpcbind start (or if you use older version /etc/init.d/portmap start) 3. /etc/init.d/nfsd start 4. check if "/opt" was really exported showmount -e nfs.server.ip.address If it doesn't work, let's debug it. Serge On 11/01/2011 04:52 AM, Chris Grove wrote: > Hi All. > Now I'm sure I'm just being thick (like I was with the bridging network > interfaces), but I can't seem to work out how to setup NFS Shares on my DL > server. So first off, can this be done? and secondly can someone give me an > Idiots Guide on how to do it please? > Thanks in advance, Chris. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA® Conference 2012 > Save$700 by Nov 18 > Register now > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Gordon R. <gru...@cl...> - 2011-11-01 20:00:37
|
I don't have it running on DL, but likely you just need to define the file system(s) you want to share out in the file /etc/exports. "man exports" will give you the file requirements/capabilities. Also make sure you have enabled NFS server in /etc/sysconfig/config (ie run DL's "setup" command and check off NFSD). Gordon Russell Clarke County IT ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Heiko Zuerker" <he...@zu...> > To: dev...@li... > Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2011 3:36:14 PM > Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] NFS Server > Quoting Chris Grove <dl...@ki...>: > > > Hi All. > > Now I'm sure I'm just being thick (like I was with the bridging > > network > > interfaces), but I can't seem to work out how to setup NFS Shares on > > my DL > > server. So first off, can this be done? and secondly can someone > > give me an > > Idiots Guide on how to do it please? > > Thanks in advance, Chris. > > It should work. I don't have a NFS server running personally, so I > can't give you any working examples. > > -- > > Regards > Heiko Zuerker > http://www.devil-linux.org > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > RSA® Conference 2012 > Save $700 by Nov 18 > Register now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-11-01 19:36:25
|
Quoting Chris Grove <dl...@ki...>: > Hi All. > Now I'm sure I'm just being thick (like I was with the bridging network > interfaces), but I can't seem to work out how to setup NFS Shares on my DL > server. So first off, can this be done? and secondly can someone give me an > Idiots Guide on how to do it please? > Thanks in advance, Chris. It should work. I don't have a NFS server running personally, so I can't give you any working examples. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Chris G. <dl...@ki...> - 2011-11-01 11:52:17
|
Hi All. Now I'm sure I'm just being thick (like I was with the bridging network interfaces), but I can't seem to work out how to setup NFS Shares on my DL server. So first off, can this be done? and secondly can someone give me an Idiots Guide on how to do it please? Thanks in advance, Chris. |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-10-20 12:08:35
|
I added the fix to the CVS version, it'll be included in the next release. Thanks -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Storms [mailto:rs...@mi...] > Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 3:43 PM > To: dev...@li... > Subject: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Bind issue with devil-linux-1.4.3-2011-10-12- > i686-server.tar.bz2 > > > Bind will not start in this distribution. > > I found a workaround by adding the following line in at the end of the list of > 'COPY' lines in /etc/sysconfig/jail/ISC_BIND: > > COPY /usr/lib/engines/libgost.so > -- > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Bind-issue-with-devil- > linux-1.4.3-2011-10-12-i686-server.tar.bz2-tp32648372p32648372.html > Sent from the devil-linux-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a > definitive record of customers, application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Rob S. <rs...@mi...> - 2011-10-13 20:42:41
|
Bind will not start in this distribution. I found a workaround by adding the following line in at the end of the list of 'COPY' lines in /etc/sysconfig/jail/ISC_BIND: COPY /usr/lib/engines/libgost.so -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Bind-issue-with-devil-linux-1.4.3-2011-10-12-i686-server.tar.bz2-tp32648372p32648372.html Sent from the devil-linux-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-10-04 13:19:01
|
Quoting Dominic Raferd <dl...@ed...>: > I don't see server version? Forgot to upload it, I'll do that with the next update. > what is the K8 release? Crap, didn't want to upload that one. This is optimized for AMD CPU's. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2011-10-04 07:31:51
|
ftp://ftp.devil-linux.org/pub/ see 'devel/testing' for test versions Dominic On 03/10/2011 15:09, Rob Storms wrote: > I notice the following on the devil-linux-discuss list: > > "I uploaded a new DL testing version to the FTP server." > > There seems to be inconsistency with the availability and content on the > servers listed on the downloads page for the main site. > > Can I get the URI for the "FTP server" that you are referring to, so that I > am getting the latest test version? > > Perhaps at some point, someone could update the downloads list, and label at > least one as the "preferred site". > > Thanks. > |
|
From: Dominic R. <dl...@ed...> - 2011-10-04 07:31:23
|
I don't see server version? what is the K8 release? On 29/09/2011 20:49, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Hello, > > I uploaded a new DL testing version to the FTP server. > The main change is the 3.0 Kernel. > > Please let report any issues. > |
|
From: Rob S. <rs...@mi...> - 2011-10-03 14:09:18
|
I notice the following on the devil-linux-discuss list: "I uploaded a new DL testing version to the FTP server. " There seems to be inconsistency with the availability and content on the servers listed on the downloads page for the main site. Can I get the URI for the "FTP server" that you are referring to, so that I am getting the latest test version? Perhaps at some point, someone could update the downloads list, and label at least one as the "preferred site". Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Update-to-Bind-tp32551987p32582573.html Sent from the devil-linux-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-10-01 12:58:52
|
The discuss mailinglist will have notices about all the builds. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Storms [mailto:rs...@mi...] > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2011 8:56 AM > To: dev...@li... > Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Update to Bind > > > Thanks for the update. > > Is there a mailing list I can subscribe to, to be notified when there are > updated builds? > > > Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > > > Rob, > > > > we'll add it to the list for the next update. > > > > Heiko > > > > Quoting Rob Storms <rs...@mi...>: > > > >> Is there an update to bind coming soon. I'm getting PCI scan Failures > >> because the version of bind in Devil Linux is 9.7.3. > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://old.nabble.com/Update-to-Bind-tp32551987p32551987.html > >> Sent from the devil-linux-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> --------- All the data continuously generated in your IT > >> infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application > >> performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk > >> takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. > >> Common sense. > >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > >> Dev...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > > > > > -- > > > > Regards > > Heiko Zuerker > > http://www.devil-linux.org > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > -------- All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure > > contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, > > security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data > > and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 > > _______________________________________________ > > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > > Dev...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Update-to-Bind- > tp32551987p32569136.html > Sent from the devil-linux-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. > Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy2 > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Rob S. <rs...@mi...> - 2011-09-30 13:56:21
|
Thanks for the update. Is there a mailing list I can subscribe to, to be notified when there are updated builds? Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > Rob, > > we'll add it to the list for the next update. > > Heiko > > Quoting Rob Storms <rs...@mi...>: > >> Is there an update to bind coming soon. I'm getting PCI scan Failures >> because >> the version of bind in Devil Linux is 9.7.3. >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://old.nabble.com/Update-to-Bind-tp32551987p32551987.html >> Sent from the devil-linux-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a >> definitive record of customers, application performance, security >> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes >> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > > -- > > Regards > Heiko Zuerker > http://www.devil-linux.org > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a > definitive record of customers, application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Update-to-Bind-tp32551987p32569136.html Sent from the devil-linux-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-09-29 19:50:07
|
Hello, I uploaded a new DL testing version to the FTP server. The main change is the 3.0 Kernel. Please let report any issues. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-09-29 14:02:42
|
Rob, we'll add it to the list for the next update. Heiko Quoting Rob Storms <rs...@mi...>: > Is there an update to bind coming soon. I'm getting PCI scan Failures because > the version of bind in Devil Linux is 9.7.3. > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Update-to-Bind-tp32551987p32551987.html > Sent from the devil-linux-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a > definitive record of customers, application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Rob S. <rs...@mi...> - 2011-09-29 13:38:35
|
Is there an update to bind coming soon. I'm getting PCI scan Failures because the version of bind in Devil Linux is 9.7.3. -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Update-to-Bind-tp32551987p32551987.html Sent from the devil-linux-discuss mailing list archive at Nabble.com. |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-09-23 12:44:47
|
It's fixed in CVS -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org > -----Original Message----- > From: Dominic Raferd [mailto:dl...@ed...] > Sent: Saturday, September 17, 2011 1:57 AM > To: dev...@li... > Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] portmap in config? > > On 16/09/11 17:14, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > Quoting Dominic Raferd<dl...@ed...>: > > > >> I have moved both my machines to DL 1.4.3-2011-09-02 [server edition] > >> from the previous DL 1.4.3 testing release. In one case I was asked > >> to go through the normal 'upgrade' process at boot time, in the other I > wasn't. > >> > >> On the machine that did not 'upgrade' I have an [unselected] entry > >> for 'PORTMAP' in setup (both in the setup program [no explanatory > >> text at the bottom though] and in /etc/sysconfig/config), on the > >> machine that did 'upgrade' there is no such entry. > > Not sure about that. If it's empty, simply remove it. Upgrade-config > > will create any missing entries automatically. > > > >> Re-running save-config maintains these configurations i.e. they stay > >> different. > >> > >> I try to maintain these machines as mirrors so this difference gets > >> flagged, that's why I noticed it. > >> > >> Which is right? Is there a way to force the upgrade script to run (if > >> it has not run when it should)? > > Change the file /etc/Devil-release, so it reflects an older version. > > This will invoke the upgrade-config during the next boot. > > > I did that but it still didn't run. So I remade the flash drive, this time selecting > Syslinux without serial console, and then it worked okay. > > Originally for this machine I selected 'Syslinux with serial console' > (just as an experiment, I have never used serial console), and found that > most of the start-up information never appears on the screen, and similarly > the upgrade never appears. > > After this successful upgrade, the /etc/sysconfig/config file was broken (so > that setup / services does not run) - the same situation that arose with my > other machine, see my Mantis report. I wonder if the new broken line in this > file, which I have to remove manually, is meant to relate to portmap? > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- > BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA > http://p.sf.net/sfu/rim-devcon-copy2 > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Andrzej O. <an...@ma...> - 2011-09-22 14:44:57
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote:
> Currently DL is using the kernel drivers, not the ones provides by Intel.
> But you're absolutely right, updating the Intel drivers and using them
> may solve the problem.
Sure. I checked presence of scripts and sources, but not default configuration
--- there igb is disabled. So for first time Brad should try standard
compilation with enabling in "System|Hardware Support|To use Intel driver
(igb) insted of the kernel one" and after to upgrade igb sources.
> I kicked off a test compile with the 3.0.4 kernel, we'll see how far I get...
Congratulations, Heiko. So you are not "Fast Five" but "Fast Sixth" maybe ;)
When you pushed kernel to 2.6.38.7, in my Asterisk Mod, Sangoma telephony
cards drivers stops to compile. I do not use Sangoma's drivers. I made it just
for the record. But I asked guys in Sangoma and they answered, so this kernel
is *not supported yet*. So you are faster. I like it!
Regards
--
Andrzej Odyniec
<an...@ma...>
Rada Nadzorcza Macrologic SA
ul. Kłopotowskiego 22, 03-717 Warszawa
tel. +48-222566332, kom. +48-601276572
Skype: andrzej.odyniec
Rejestr: Sąd Rejonowy dla m.st. Warszawy,
XIII Wydział Gospodarczy Krajowego
Rejestru Sądowego, numer 0000045462
Numer identyfikacji podatkowej: PL 5220002825
Kapitał zakładowy: 1888719 zł opłacony w całości
|
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-09-22 13:22:33
|
Quoting Andrzej Odyniec <an...@ma...>: > Brad, > > According to your lspci printout, you have probably 8 ethernet ports on two > four-head ethernet cards based on two-head Intel chips and this need > separately compiled igb driver not included in standard kernel. DL contains > igb driver, but in version 1.3.19.3 from 2009-03-19. Maybe this old driver is > improper for so new devices, as your Portland? > > So you can try compile your own DL with replaced sources from > igb-1.3.19.3.tar.gz to maybe last stable igb-3.2.9.tar.gz and test this new > driver with your cards. If result will be positive, probably this driver will > be renewed in standard DL distribution. > > Igb driver sources are on sourceforge: > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/files/igb%20stable/ Currently DL is using the kernel drivers, not the ones provides by Intel. But you're absolutely right, updating the Intel drivers and using them may solve the problem. I kicked off a test compile with the 3.0.4 kernel, we'll see how far I get... -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Andrzej O. <an...@ma...> - 2011-09-22 12:45:49
|
Brad, According to your lspci printout, you have probably 8 ethernet ports on two four-head ethernet cards based on two-head Intel chips and this need separately compiled igb driver not included in standard kernel. DL contains igb driver, but in version 1.3.19.3 from 2009-03-19. Maybe this old driver is improper for so new devices, as your Portland? So you can try compile your own DL with replaced sources from igb-1.3.19.3.tar.gz to maybe last stable igb-3.2.9.tar.gz and test this new driver with your cards. If result will be positive, probably this driver will be renewed in standard DL distribution. Igb driver sources are on sourceforge: http://sourceforge.net/projects/e1000/files/igb%20stable/ Best regards -- Andrzej Odyniec |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2011-09-22 12:32:38
|
Quoting Bradlee Landis <bra...@gm...>: > I am trying Devil Linux on a server. I was told to use igb drivers, > but the interfaces aren't showing up. I tried adding "alias eth0 igb" > and "alias eth0 e1000" and running "modprobe eth0", but neither > worked. Any idea how to get it working? Which version of DL are you using? Did you try the latest test version? -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Serge L. <ser...@gm...> - 2011-09-21 23:44:01
|
On 09/21/2011 03:35 PM, Bradlee Landis wrote: > > Thanks for checking. I have an understanding of the application layer > on top of Linux, but I don't know much about hardware integration > beyond trying modprobe. I don't know which exactly services do you need, but if they are pretty simple - basic router/firewall/server etc I can suggest you building DL in 64bit - it's a research project but I use it and it works very good. I've finished the latest 3.0 kernel integration, so I'd expect it will work on your 'Sandy Bridge' system correctly. Sincerely, Serge |
|
From: Bradlee L. <bra...@gm...> - 2011-09-21 22:35:07
|
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 4:23 PM, Serge Leschinsky <ser...@gm...> wrote: > the system obviously doesn't recognize this network card. I guess in "dmesg" you > can find the reason. I cannot reproduce the case, I have no such quad-head NIC. > > I doubt the problem can be fixed by reconfiguration - most probably you need an > even more recent kernel. I'd also mention that you will have performance problem > because you need 64bit system/kernel to completely utilize the card > capabilities. Probably it's the reason why the card doesn't work - the current > DL kernel is 32bit. > > Serge Thanks for checking. I have an understanding of the application layer on top of Linux, but I don't know much about hardware integration beyond trying modprobe. Keep up the good work! -- Thanks, Brad Landis |
|
From: Serge L. <ser...@gm...> - 2011-09-21 21:23:36
|
the system obviously doesn't recognize this network card. I guess in "dmesg" you can find the reason. I cannot reproduce the case, I have no such quad-head NIC. I doubt the problem can be fixed by reconfiguration - most probably you need an even more recent kernel. I'd also mention that you will have performance problem because you need 64bit system/kernel to completely utilize the card capabilities. Probably it's the reason why the card doesn't work - the current DL kernel is 32bit. Serge On 09/21/2011 01:52 PM, Bradlee Landis wrote: > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Serge Leschinsky > <ser...@gm...> wrote: >> Brad, >> >> could you please show the output from "lspci -v"? >> > > It's attached. > |
|
From: Bradlee L. <bra...@gm...> - 2011-09-21 20:52:58
|
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 3:46 PM, Serge Leschinsky <ser...@gm...> wrote: > Brad, > > could you please show the output from "lspci -v"? > It's attached. -- Thanks, Brad Landis |
50 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
