You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(59) |
Sep
(57) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(45) |
Dec
(21) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(22) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(25) |
Aug
(40) |
Sep
(53) |
Oct
(58) |
Nov
(75) |
Dec
(22) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(101) |
Feb
(101) |
Mar
(103) |
Apr
(125) |
May
(85) |
Jun
(57) |
Jul
(62) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(76) |
Oct
(214) |
Nov
(290) |
Dec
(274) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(187) |
Feb
(172) |
Mar
(313) |
Apr
(209) |
May
(169) |
Jun
(147) |
Jul
(118) |
Aug
(193) |
Sep
(227) |
Oct
(125) |
Nov
(246) |
Dec
(191) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(244) |
Feb
(175) |
Mar
(165) |
Apr
(130) |
May
(217) |
Jun
(122) |
Jul
(188) |
Aug
(235) |
Sep
(165) |
Oct
(133) |
Nov
(209) |
Dec
(88) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(89) |
Mar
(108) |
Apr
(91) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(45) |
Jul
(64) |
Aug
(42) |
Sep
(44) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(64) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(122) |
Mar
(55) |
Apr
(50) |
May
(84) |
Jun
(13) |
Jul
(80) |
Aug
(70) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(56) |
Dec
(42) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(65) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(51) |
Apr
(151) |
May
(54) |
Jun
(72) |
Jul
(73) |
Aug
(47) |
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(123) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2009 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(39) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(36) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(51) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(14) |
Sep
(40) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(13) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(15) |
Feb
(35) |
Mar
(40) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(26) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(50) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(67) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(50) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(13) |
May
(29) |
Jun
(27) |
Jul
(26) |
Aug
(27) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(27) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(20) |
Mar
(48) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
|
Aug
(15) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(1) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(25) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
|
Nov
(5) |
Dec
(10) |
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(6) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(21) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
|
Nov
(17) |
Dec
(32) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(10) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(7) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(11) |
Jul
(15) |
Aug
(26) |
Sep
(13) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(16) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2017 |
Jan
(9) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(3) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(4) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Ross P. <Ros...@ca...> - 2007-02-02 13:00:22
|
Windows=20firewall=20isn't=20running=20on=20the=20server=20and=20as=20far=20= as=20I=20can=20see, Exchange=20is=20setup=20the=20same=20as=20the=20other=20server. =20 I've=20not=20touched=20the=20firewall=20rules=20on=20the=20DL=20box=20befo= re,=20presumably they're=20in=20a=20file=20somewhere?=20If=20I=20change=20them,=20I'll=20ne= ed=20to=20restart=20a process=20or=20something=20to=20pick=20up=20any=20changes? =20 ________________________________ From:=20d...@li... [mailto:dev...@li...]=20On=20Behalf=20= Of Moray=20McConnachie Sent:=2002=20February=202007=2012:12 To:=20d...@li... Subject:=20Re:=20[Devil-Linux-discuss]=20SMTP =20 Sorry,=20mangled=20and=20top-posted:=20try=20this=20one!=20 =20 =20 =20RP:=20=20I've=20just=20installed=20a=20new=20Exchange=20server=20in=20o= ne=20of=20the=20offices but=20I'm=20having=20trouble=20getting=20it=20all=20working.=20From=20offi= ce=20A=20LAN,=20I=20can telnet=20to=20the=20new=20server=20on=20port=2025=20no=20problem.=20From=20= office=20B=20LAN though,=20I=20can't=20telnet=20to=20the=20existing=20server.=20If=20I=20SS= H=20to=20any=20of=20the=202 DL=20boxes,=20I=20can=20telnet=20to=20it=20no=20problem.=20=20=20So=20the=20= issue=20would=20seem=20to=20be on=20the=20DL=20box=20on=20LAN=20B.=20Can=20anyone=20suggest=20what=20I'm=20= doing=20wrong/what=20I need=20to=20change=20on=20that=20box? =20 MM:=20Assuming=20you=20are=20able=20in=20general=20to=20use=20from=20offic= e=20B=20LAN=20other TCP/IP=20services=20running=20on=20privileged=20ports=20in=20the=20same=20= subnet=20as=20the server=20(but=20behind=20the=20DL=20box),=20then=20the=20only=20places=20I= =20can=20think=20of=20to look=20are=20the=20firewall=20rules=20on=20the=20DL=20host,=20with=20parti= cular=20reference=20to port=2025=20plus=20any=20firewalling=20on=20the=20windows=20host,=20and=20= Exchange's=20own=20IP permissions=20which=20you=20can=20find=20for=20this=20purpose=20in=20the=20= properties=20in whichever=20SMTP=20virtual=20host=20you=20have=20configured.=20 =20 Yours, Moray ________________________________________________________________________ This=20email=20has=20been=20scanned=20for=20all=20viruses=20by=20the=20Mes= sageLabs=20Email security=20system.=20For=20more=20information=20visit=20www.messagelabs.co= m ________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ IMPORTANT=20=96=20our=20=93canoffshore.ltd.uk=94=20address=20is=20schedule= d=20for=20cancellation.=20=20Address=20books=20should=20be=20changed=20to=20= use=20our=20=93cangroup.net=94=20address.=20=20Thank=20you=20for=20your=20= cooperation. This=20transmission=20contains=20information=20which=20may=20be=20confiden= tial=20and=20that=20may=20also=20be=20privileged.=20=20It=20is=20intended=20= for=20the=20named=20addressee=20only.=20=20Unless=20you=20are=20the=20name= d=20addressee,=20or=20authorised=20to=20receive=20it=20on=20behalf=20of=20= the=20addressee,=20you=20may=20not=20copy=20or=20use=20it,=20or=20disclose= =20it=20to=20anyone=20else.=20=20If=20you=20have=20received=20this=20trans= mission=20in=20error=20please=20contact=20the=20sender.=20=20Thank=20you=20= for=20your=20cooperation. This=20email=20has=20been=20scanned=20for=20all=20viruses=20by=20the=20Mes= sageLabs=20SkyScan=20service.=20=20CAN=20also=20uses=20the=20MessageLabs=20= spam=20filtering=20service.=20=20This=20should=20not=20affect=20routine=20= messages=20but=20in=20rare=20cases=20a=20bona-fide=20message=20could=20be=20= blocked.=20=20Please=20contact=20CAN=20if=20you=20experience=20any=20diffi= culties. ________________________________________________________________________ |
|
From: Moray M. <mmc...@ox...> - 2007-02-02 12:12:30
|
Sorry, mangled and top-posted: try this one!=20 =20 =20 RP: I've just installed a new Exchange server in one of the offices but I'm having trouble getting it all working. From office A LAN, I can telnet to the new server on port 25 no problem. From office B LAN though, I can't telnet to the existing server. If I SSH to any of the 2 DL boxes, I can telnet to it no problem. So the issue would seem to be on the DL box on LAN B. Can anyone suggest what I'm doing wrong/what I need to change on that box?=20 =20 MM: Assuming you are able in general to use from office B LAN other TCP/IP services running on privileged ports in the same subnet as the server (but behind the DL box), then the only places I can think of to look are the firewall rules on the DL host, with particular reference to port 25 plus any firewalling on the windows host, and Exchange's own IP permissions which you can find for this purpose in the properties in whichever SMTP virtual host you have configured.=20 =20 Yours, Moray |
|
From: Frank W. <Fra...@ct...> - 2007-02-02 12:10:51
|
Hi, is the exchange server in LAN A? If so, i'd guess that the exchange server = has=20 a wrong (short) netmask... In any case, run=20 tcpdump -i <name of the LAN interface> host <exch server> on the DL closest to the exchange server. Then try the telnet form remote a= nd=20 see what happens.=20 You could have netmask problems on the client side also, of course... but we need more info to tell for sure.=20 Hth, =46rank On Friday 02 February 2007 11:58:04 Ross Petrie wrote: > Hi, > > > > Hopefully someone can help, I'm sure it's an easy fix. > > > > I have a Devil Linux box at either end of a wireless link which links 2 > offices. The DL boxes just provide routing between the different > subnets. > > > > I've just installed a new Exchange server in one of the offices but I'm > having trouble getting it all working. From office A LAN, I can telnet > to the new server on port 25 no problem. From office B LAN though, I > can't telnet to the existing server. If I SSH to any of the 2 DL boxes, > I can telnet to it no problem. > > > > So the issue would seem to be on the DL box on LAN B. Can anyone suggest > what I'm doing wrong/what I need to change on that box? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Ross Petrie > > > > IT Administrator > > CAN Offshore Ltd > > Hareness Road > > Altens > > Aberdeen > > AB12 3LE > > > > > ________________________________________________________________________ > IMPORTANT =96 our =93canoffshore.ltd.uk=94 address is scheduled for cance= llation. > Address books should be changed to use our =93cangroup.net=94 address. = Thank > you for your cooperation. > > This transmission contains information which may be confidential and that > may also be privileged. It is intended for the named addressee only.=20 > Unless you are the named addressee, or authorised to receive it on behalf > of the addressee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone > else. If you have received this transmission in error please contact the > sender. Thank you for your cooperation. > > This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan > service. CAN also uses the MessageLabs spam filtering service. This > should not affect routine messages but in rare cases a bona-fide message > could be blocked. Please contact CAN if you experience any difficulties. > ________________________________________________________________________ =2D-=20 _______________________________________________ Centre de Technologie de l'Education 29 avenue John F. Kennedy L-1855 Luxembourg-Kirchberg email: Fra...@ct... t=E9l.: +352 478-5973 fax: +352 333797 _______________________________________________ |
|
From: Moray M. <mmc...@ox...> - 2007-02-02 12:05:53
|
Assuming you are able in general to use from office B LAN other TCP/IP services running on privileged ports in the same subnet as the server (but behind the DL box), then the only places I can think of to look, plus any firewalling on the windows host, and Exchange's own IP permissions which you can find for this purpose in the properties in whichever SMTP virtual host you have configured. =20 Yours, Moray ------------------------------------- Moray McConnachie IS Manager +44 1865 261 600 Oxford Analytica http://www.oxan.com <http://www.oxan.com/>=20 =20 ________________________________ From: dev...@li... [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Ross Petrie Sent: 02 February 2007 10:58 To: dev...@li... Subject: [Devil-Linux-discuss] SMTP Hi, =20 Hopefully someone can help, I'm sure it's an easy fix. =20 I have a Devil Linux box at either end of a wireless link which links 2 offices. The DL boxes just provide routing between the different subnets. =20 I've just installed a new Exchange server in one of the offices but I'm having trouble getting it all working. From office A LAN, I can telnet to the new server on port 25 no problem. From office B LAN though, I can't telnet to the existing server. If I SSH to any of the 2 DL boxes, I can telnet to it no problem. =20 So the issue would seem to be on the DL box on LAN B. Can anyone suggest what I'm doing wrong/what I need to change on that box? =20 =20 =20 Thanks =20 Ross Petrie =20 IT Administrator CAN Offshore Ltd Hareness Road Altens Aberdeen AB12 3LE =20 ________________________________________________________________________ IMPORTANT - our "canoffshore.ltd.uk" address is scheduled for cancellation. Address books should be changed to use our "cangroup.net" address. Thank you for your cooperation. This transmission contains information which may be confidential and that may also be privileged. It is intended for the named addressee only. Unless you are the named addressee, or authorised to receive it on behalf of the addressee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you have received this transmission in error please contact the sender. Thank you for your cooperation. This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service. CAN also uses the MessageLabs spam filtering service. This should not affect routine messages but in rare cases a bona-fide message could be blocked. Please contact CAN if you experience any difficulties. ________________________________________________________________________ |
|
From: Ross P. <Ros...@ca...> - 2007-02-02 11:01:16
|
Hi, =20 Hopefully=20someone=20can=20help,=20I'm=20sure=20it's=20an=20easy=20fix. =20 I=20have=20a=20Devil=20Linux=20box=20at=20either=20end=20of=20a=20wireless= =20link=20which=20links=202 offices.=20The=20DL=20boxes=20just=20provide=20routing=20between=20the=20d= ifferent subnets. =20 I've=20just=20installed=20a=20new=20Exchange=20server=20in=20one=20of=20th= e=20offices=20but=20I'm having=20trouble=20getting=20it=20all=20working.=20From=20office=20A=20LAN= ,=20I=20can=20telnet to=20the=20new=20server=20on=20port=2025=20no=20problem.=20From=20office=20= B=20LAN=20though,=20I can't=20telnet=20to=20the=20existing=20server.=20If=20I=20SSH=20to=20any=20= of=20the=202=20DL=20boxes, I=20can=20telnet=20to=20it=20no=20problem. =20 So=20the=20issue=20would=20seem=20to=20be=20on=20the=20DL=20box=20on=20LAN= =20B.=20Can=20anyone=20suggest what=20I'm=20doing=20wrong/what=20I=20need=20to=20change=20on=20that=20box= ? =20 =20 =20 Thanks =20 Ross=20Petrie =20 IT=20Administrator CAN=20Offshore=20Ltd Hareness=20Road Altens Aberdeen AB12=203LE =20 ________________________________________________________________________ IMPORTANT=20=96=20our=20=93canoffshore.ltd.uk=94=20address=20is=20schedule= d=20for=20cancellation.=20=20Address=20books=20should=20be=20changed=20to=20= use=20our=20=93cangroup.net=94=20address.=20=20Thank=20you=20for=20your=20= cooperation. This=20transmission=20contains=20information=20which=20may=20be=20confiden= tial=20and=20that=20may=20also=20be=20privileged.=20=20It=20is=20intended=20= for=20the=20named=20addressee=20only.=20=20Unless=20you=20are=20the=20name= d=20addressee,=20or=20authorised=20to=20receive=20it=20on=20behalf=20of=20= the=20addressee,=20you=20may=20not=20copy=20or=20use=20it,=20or=20disclose= =20it=20to=20anyone=20else.=20=20If=20you=20have=20received=20this=20trans= mission=20in=20error=20please=20contact=20the=20sender.=20=20Thank=20you=20= for=20your=20cooperation. This=20email=20has=20been=20scanned=20for=20all=20viruses=20by=20the=20Mes= sageLabs=20SkyScan=20service.=20=20CAN=20also=20uses=20the=20MessageLabs=20= spam=20filtering=20service.=20=20This=20should=20not=20affect=20routine=20= messages=20but=20in=20rare=20cases=20a=20bona-fide=20message=20could=20be=20= blocked.=20=20Please=20contact=20CAN=20if=20you=20experience=20any=20diffi= culties. ________________________________________________________________________ |
|
From: Frank W. <Fra...@ct...> - 2007-02-02 10:59:09
|
Hi all, I know this is slightly off topic, but here's what I'm trying todo: I have two different networks behind my firewalls. Both are Windows domains= =2E=20 At the moment users of one network have VPN access from the outside: on the= ir=20 AD server, the vpn-users are all member of a special container, and I use=20 pptpd with samba/winbind/ntlm_auth via ntlm_auth-helper to authenticate the= m. Now, users of the other Network/Domain also need VPN access to their networ= k=20 from outside. I can easily add a second IP to the outside NIC, and run a=20 separate pptpd, but i'd also need to instances of Samba running; this seems= =20 exremely complicated and hard to maintain, IF I can manage to get it to wor= k=20 at all.=20 Do you ppl have any ideas for alternatives? I could possibly use a differen= t=20 vpn server for the second network but there has to be a windows client, and= =20 the client setup has to be straightforward (ie openvpn is considered too ha= rd=20 for my users). Thanks a lot in advance =46rank =2D-=20 _______________________________________________ Centre de Technologie de l'Education 29 avenue John F. Kennedy L-1855 Luxembourg-Kirchberg email: Fra...@ct... t=E9l.: +352 478-5973 fax: +352 333797 _______________________________________________ |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-01-26 14:18:03
|
On Fri, January 26, 2007 03:17, Dick Middleton wrote: > Johnny R. Wooten, Sr. wrote: > > >> Quick question for ya if you don't mind. I'm new to linux but have been >> around Unix (solaris) more than 8 - 10 years ago. I've heard that DL >> is the best way to go for firewall. I'm trying to setup firewall at >> home. My question is how can I obtain NIC modules for network cards that >> don't seem to be listed in the module setup portion of DL? > > They look like fairly standard PCMCIA cards with PCMCIA support. I'm > not sure why the PCMCIA modules are not available. Someone else on the > list might know. > > The problem is that DL is CD based system and you can't just install > modules or programs (because it's read-only filesystem). > > If you really need to add them then you have to build your own image. > > >> Thanks in advanced. The cards I'm using are PCMCIA 3Com cards ( 3c589D >> 10MB) >> x2 and (3ccfe574bt 10/100MB) x2 You have to start the PCMCIA sub system. Turn this on in /etc/sysconfig/config. For testing just run /etc/init.d/pcmcia start . More infos you find here: http://pcmcia-cs.sourceforge.net/ ALSO: Please do not start a new thread by replying to an old one, this screws up the thread view in email clients. Please always start with a new email/thread on a new topic. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Dick M. <di...@li...> - 2007-01-26 09:17:26
|
Johnny R. Wooten, Sr. wrote: > Quick question for ya if you don't mind. I'm new to linux but have been > around Unix (solaris) more than 8 - 10 years ago. I've heard that DL is the > best way to go for firewall. I'm trying to setup firewall at home. My > question is how can I obtain NIC modules for network cards that don't seem > to be listed in the module setup portion of DL? They look like fairly standard PCMCIA cards with PCMCIA support. I'm not sure why the PCMCIA modules are not available. Someone else on the list might know. The problem is that DL is CD based system and you can't just install modules or programs (because it's read-only filesystem). If you really need to add them then you have to build your own image. > Thanks in advanced. The cards I'm using are PCMCIA 3Com cards ( 3c589D 10MB) > x2 and (3ccfe574bt 10/100MB) x2 Dick |
|
From: Johnny R. W. Sr. <jrw...@ve...> - 2007-01-26 06:22:28
|
Hey Dick, Quick question for ya if you don't mind. I'm new to linux but have been around Unix (solaris) more than 8 - 10 years ago. I've heard that DL is the best way to go for firewall. I'm trying to setup firewall at home. My question is how can I obtain NIC modules for network cards that don't seem to be listed in the module setup portion of DL? Thanks in advanced. The cards I'm using are PCMCIA 3Com cards ( 3c589D 10MB) x2 and (3ccfe574bt 10/100MB) x2 Thanks a million, Johnny -----Original Message----- From: dev...@li... [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Dick Middleton Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 3:28 PM To: dev...@li... Subject: [Devil-Linux-discuss] DL Mirror cloudy In case you're not aware I've just noticed the DL mirror Linjection HTTP is not very reflective. It doesn't seem to have been updated since November. Dick ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Devil-linux-discuss mailing list Dev...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Dick M. <di...@li...> - 2007-01-22 21:28:03
|
In case you're not aware I've just noticed the DL mirror Linjection HTTP is not very reflective. It doesn't seem to have been updated since November. Dick |
|
From: Dick M. <di...@li...> - 2007-01-22 13:27:35
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > This website is a good start: http://lartc.org/ > DL should have all the required components. > I think shorewall (which is included in DL) also supports traffic shaping. > I've just run "The Ultimate Setup For Your Internet Connection At Home" script - the HTB version (see section 15.8.3 in HOWTO on above site) and it works (DL 1.2.11). I mean the script doesn't fail. Whether it does what's wanted is another matter ;-) Dick |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-01-22 02:54:11
|
On Sat, January 20, 2007 00:42, Aleksandar Vestica wrote: > Hallo, > > > Is there any way to configure Bandwidth Limitation for Shared Access - > or over Squid Proxy ? > > Background Info: > > > 1 x Shares ADSL Line WAN Access > 3-5 Internal Users by DHCP LAN > > > If 1-2 users are using eMule or downloading like crazy, then no needed > traffic (eg: Mail Downloading, Skype, ...) will be available for the rest > of the users ... :-/ > > Thanks for Infos, Feedback or any suggestions. Would be nice, to switch > to Devil-Linux ;-) This website is a good start: http://lartc.org/ DL should have all the required components. I think shorewall (which is included in DL) also supports traffic shaping. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Aleksandar V. <a.v...@ma...> - 2007-01-20 06:42:10
|
Hallo, Is there any way to configure Bandwidth Limitation for Shared Access - or over Squid Proxy ? Background Info: 1 x Shares ADSL Line WAN Access 3-5 Internal Users by DHCP LAN If 1-2 users are using eMule or downloading like crazy, then no needed traffic (eg: Mail Downloading, Skype, ...) will be available for the rest of the users ... :-/ Thanks for Infos, Feedback or any suggestions. Would be nice, to switch to Devil-Linux ;-) Regards, Aleks. |
|
From: Fuchs J. <Jos...@le...> - 2007-01-19 09:52:03
|
Thats fine Josef > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > Von: dev...@li...=20 > [mailto:dev...@li...] Im=20 > Auftrag von Heiko Zuerker > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. J=E4nner 2007 13:27 > An: dev...@li... > Betreff: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Heartbeat with DL 1.2.11 >=20 >=20 > I added the upgrade to the latest heartbeat to my todo list.=20 > Watch the pre-releases for inclusion. >=20 > Heiko >=20 > On Thu, January 18, 2007 05:52, Rudner, Bj=F6rn wrote: > > Hello, > > > > > > i would also use the newser Heartbeat, so if there already=20 > any hints=20 > > on using it, I would also like to hear about it. > > > > Actually I'm using a custom build from DL 1.2.10 with downgraded=20 > > Heartbeat to 1.x release. > > > > > > The problems I had to fight with: > > heartbeat 2.x uses scripts that where not functioning in further=20 > > releases (fixed in the meantime I think) > > > > > > Next I had problems with "replay attacks" after restarting=20 > one node. I=20 > > fixed that by fist setting heartbeat to use timestamps (hbgenmethod=20 > > time) And next I changed the order of the init-scripts, that=20 > > heartbeat starts AFTER the server had startet ntp (#=20 > Required-Start:=20 > > $network $time $syslog xntpd) > > > > > > But now I would take a look at using heartbeat 2.x, so if there=20 > > already some "case studies" out there, please let us know. > > > > Mit freundlichen Gr=FCssen / Kind Regards > > > > > > Bj=F6rn Rudner > > > > > > ____________________________________________ > > Bj=F6rn Rudner > > Systemadministrator > > > > > > baulogis GmbH Zamdorfer Strasse 100 > > 81677 M=FCnchen > > > > > > Telefon +49 (89) 930 839-16 > > Telefax +49 1805 456 987-200 16 > > Mobil +49 151 12 16 23 71 > > E-Mail br...@ba... > > http://www.baulogis.com/ > > > > > > -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: dev...@li... > > [mailto:dev...@li...]=20 > Im Auftrag=20 > > von Fuchs Josef > > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 11:07 > > An: dev...@li... > > Betreff: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Heartbeat with DL 1.2.11 > > > > > > Hello! > > > > > > I like to use heartbeat for high availability in the future. In the=20 > > forum I saw that there were some problems with it. > > > > > > Does anyone of you use heardbeat successfully with the latest DL=20 > > version? Are there any traps in configuring this functionality? > > > > > > Thanks > > Josef > > ########################################### > > > > > > This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft=20 > > Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/ > > > > > >=20 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --- > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join > > SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance=20 > to share your > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys -=20 > and earn cash > >=20 > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge &CID=3DDEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > --- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to = share > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn > cash > = http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > --=20 Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share = your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn = cash = http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Devil-linux-discuss mailing list = Dev...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss ###########################################=0A= =0A= This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft = Exchange.=0A= For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/ |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-01-18 12:27:01
|
I added the upgrade to the latest heartbeat to my todo list. Watch the pre-releases for inclusion. Heiko On Thu, January 18, 2007 05:52, Rudner, Björn wrote: > Hello, > > > i would also use the newser Heartbeat, so if there already any hints on > using it, I would also like to hear about it. > > Actually I'm using a custom build from DL 1.2.10 with downgraded > Heartbeat to 1.x release. > > > The problems I had to fight with: > heartbeat 2.x uses scripts that where not functioning in further releases > (fixed in the meantime I think) > > > Next I had problems with "replay attacks" after restarting one node. I > fixed that by fist setting heartbeat to use timestamps (hbgenmethod time) > And next I changed the order of the init-scripts, that heartbeat starts > AFTER the server had startet ntp (# Required-Start: $network $time > $syslog xntpd) > > > But now I would take a look at using heartbeat 2.x, so if there already > some "case studies" out there, please let us know. > > Mit freundlichen Grüssen / Kind Regards > > > Björn Rudner > > > ____________________________________________ > Björn Rudner > Systemadministrator > > > baulogis GmbH Zamdorfer Strasse 100 > 81677 München > > > Telefon +49 (89) 930 839-16 > Telefax +49 1805 456 987-200 16 > Mobil +49 151 12 16 23 71 > E-Mail br...@ba... > http://www.baulogis.com/ > > > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: dev...@li... > [mailto:dev...@li...] Im Auftrag von > Fuchs Josef > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 11:07 > An: dev...@li... > Betreff: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Heartbeat with DL 1.2.11 > > > Hello! > > > I like to use heartbeat for high availability in the future. In the forum > I saw that there were some problems with it. > > > Does anyone of you use heardbeat successfully with the latest DL version? > Are there any traps in configuring this functionality? > > > Thanks > Josef > ########################################### > > > This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft > Exchange. > For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/ > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join > SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn > cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: <br...@ba...> - 2007-01-18 12:08:14
|
Hello, i would also use the newser Heartbeat, so if there already any hints on = using it, I would also like to hear about it. Actually I'm using a custom build from DL 1.2.10 with downgraded = Heartbeat to 1.x release. The problems I had to fight with: heartbeat 2.x uses scripts that where not functioning in further = releases (fixed in the meantime I think) Next I had problems with "replay attacks" after restarting one node. I = fixed that by fist setting heartbeat to use timestamps (hbgenmethod = time) And next I changed the order of the init-scripts, that heartbeat starts = AFTER the server had startet ntp (# Required-Start: $network $time = $syslog xntpd) But now I would take a look at using heartbeat 2.x, so if there already = some "case studies" out there, please let us know. Mit freundlichen Gr=FCssen / Kind Regards=20 Bj=F6rn Rudner=20 ____________________________________________=20 Bj=F6rn Rudner Systemadministrator=20 baulogis GmbH Zamdorfer Strasse 100 81677 M=FCnchen=20 Telefon +49 (89) 930 839-16 Telefax +49 1805 456 987-200 16=20 Mobil +49 151 12 16 23 71=20 E-Mail br...@ba...=20 http://www.baulogis.com/ -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht----- Von: dev...@li... = [mailto:dev...@li...] Im Auftrag = von Fuchs Josef Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2007 11:07 An: dev...@li... Betreff: [Devil-Linux-discuss] Heartbeat with DL 1.2.11 Hello! I like to use heartbeat for high availability in the future. In the = forum I saw that there were some problems with it. Does anyone of you use heardbeat successfully with the latest DL = version? Are there any traps in configuring this functionality? Thanks Josef ########################################### This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft = Exchange. For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------= Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join = SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your = opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash = http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDEV _______________________________________________ Devil-linux-discuss mailing list Dev...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-01-17 20:26:54
|
On Wed, January 17, 2007 14:12, Dick Middleton wrote: > Bruce Smith wrote: > >> Devil-Linux 1.2.12 is available for download ! >> > > Excellent! > > > Can I start off the next cycle by requesting motion be updated. Added to the list. > But more important, can I also say again how much all your efforts at > making DL a great system are appreciated. Many, many thanks. You're welcome :-) -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Dick M. <di...@li...> - 2007-01-17 20:13:08
|
Bruce Smith wrote: > Devil-Linux 1.2.12 is available for download ! Excellent! Can I start off the next cycle by requesting motion be updated. But more important, can I also say again how much all your efforts at making DL a great system are appreciated. Many, many thanks. Dick |
|
From: Bruce S. <br...@ar...> - 2007-01-17 18:48:52
|
Devil-Linux 1.2.12 is available for download ! Change highlights: Kernel 2.4.34, security fixes, many package updates, new PERL modules, a few new packages, and more. See CHANGELOG for more details. -- Regards Bruce Smith http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Fuchs J. <Jos...@le...> - 2007-01-11 10:07:17
|
Hello! I like to use heartbeat for high availability in the future. In the forum I saw that there were some problems with it. Does anyone of you use heardbeat successfully with the latest DL version? Are there any traps in configuring this functionality? Thanks Josef ###########################################=0A= =0A= This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft = Exchange.=0A= For more information, connect to http://www.f-secure.com/ |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-01-11 05:15:15
|
Hey, I added the changes and uploaded a new testing release to the ftp server. The upload should be finished about 1 hour after this email was sent. cu Heiko On Wed, January 10, 2007 11:32, Peter Jannesen (Visiq) wrote: > Hey Heiko, > > > I don't think so Cyrus is having a lmtpd (daemon) for receiving. Postfix > has a lmtp client (implemented by the smtp client) for sending. > > The postfix master.cf specifies the lmtp client but there is no lmtp > client in /usr/libexec/postfix (the directory where the daemon are > located). > > -- Peter > > > -----Original Message----- > From: dev...@li... > [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf Of > Heiko Zuerker > Sent: maandag 8 januari 2007 18:37 > To: dev...@li... > Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] lmtpd missing from postfix. > > > > Hey Peter, > > > I was looking at the latest build and there's a /usr/lib/cyrus/bin/lmtpd > . > Is it possible that Postfix is supposed to use this one? > > > Heiko > > > On Sun, January 7, 2007 06:41, Peter Jannesen (Visiq) wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> >> >> >> >> In the latest release from Devil-Linux the lmtp is missing from >> > postfix. >> lmtp is de documented way to use Postfix en Cyrus IMAP. >> >> >> >> The lmtp protocol is implemented by de smtp daemon. But there needs to >> by a link from lmtp to smtp. >> >> So a simple 'ln -s smtp lmtp' in /usr/libexec/postfix will fix >> everything. >> >> I build a custom CD with the extra link and lmtp to cyrus works as >> documented. >> >> >> >> -- Peter >> >> >> >> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > - > >> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT >> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to >> > share >> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn >> cash >> > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDE > V > >> _______________________________________________ >> Devil-linux-discuss mailing list >> Dev...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss >> >> >> > > > -- > > > Regards > Heiko Zuerker > http://www.devil-linux.org > > > > > -- > > > Regards > Heiko Zuerker > http://www.devil-linux.org > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > - > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDE > V > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn > cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-01-11 01:57:27
|
On Mon, January 8, 2007 05:25, lospippolo wrote: > > Exist in devil linux a simple bandwithd monitor like (for example) bmon ? > > > How can I install it ? ntop is included in DL. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Peter J. \(Visiq\) <P.J...@vi...> - 2007-01-10 17:32:36
|
Hey Heiko, I don't think so Cyrus is having a lmtpd (daemon) for receiving. Postfix has a lmtp client (implemented by the smtp client) for sending. The postfix master.cf specifies the lmtp client but there is no lmtp client in /usr/libexec/postfix (the directory where the daemon are located). -- Peter -----Original Message----- From: dev...@li... [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Heiko Zuerker Sent: maandag 8 januari 2007 18:37 To: dev...@li... Subject: Re: [Devil-Linux-discuss] lmtpd missing from postfix. Hey Peter, I was looking at the latest build and there's a /usr/lib/cyrus/bin/lmtpd . Is it possible that Postfix is supposed to use this one? Heiko On Sun, January 7, 2007 06:41, Peter Jannesen (Visiq) wrote: > Hey, > > > > > In the latest release from Devil-Linux the lmtp is missing from postfix. > lmtp is de documented way to use Postfix en Cyrus IMAP. > > > > The lmtp protocol is implemented by de smtp daemon. But there needs to > by a link from lmtp to smtp. > > So a simple 'ln -s smtp lmtp' in /usr/libexec/postfix will fix > everything. > > I build a custom CD with the extra link and lmtp to cyrus works as > documented. > > > > -- Peter > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn > cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDE V > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > --=20 Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org --=20 Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=3Djoin.php&p=3Dsourceforge&CID=3D= DEVDE V _______________________________________________ Devil-linux-discuss mailing list Dev...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2007-01-08 17:37:30
|
Hey Peter, I was looking at the latest build and there's a /usr/lib/cyrus/bin/lmtpd . Is it possible that Postfix is supposed to use this one? Heiko On Sun, January 7, 2007 06:41, Peter Jannesen (Visiq) wrote: > Hey, > > > > > In the latest release from Devil-Linux the lmtp is missing from postfix. > lmtp is de documented way to use Postfix en Cyrus IMAP. > > > > The lmtp protocol is implemented by de smtp daemon. But there needs to > by a link from lmtp to smtp. > > So a simple 'ln -s smtp lmtp' in /usr/libexec/postfix will fix > everything. > > I build a custom CD with the extra link and lmtp to cyrus works as > documented. > > > > -- Peter > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share > your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn > cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-discuss mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-discuss > > -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: lospippolo <los...@gm...> - 2007-01-08 11:26:05
|
Exist in devil linux a simple bandwithd monitor like (for example) bmon ? How can I install it ? regards -- ____________________________________________________ Un muto molto saggio scrisse: Io non parlo con gli idioti. |