devil-linux-develop

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] make install - warnings or errors?

[Heiko Z. <hz...@pr...>]

On 05/02/2003 10:50:10 AM Bruce Smith wrote:
>OK, I ran a "make build" with a limited selections of packages,

It's about time. ;-)

>then I got my new CIPE to build using:  "./build.sh build opt=3Dcipe"

cool!

>Next I ran a "make install" (without CIPE), and got the following
>errors/warnings:
>
>-----------------------------------------------------------------
>copy libraries for ramdisk
>        libproc.so.3.1.8 =3D> not found
>        libproc.so.3.1.8 =3D> not found
>     <many duplicates trimmed>
>
>executing setfiledates with option install
>touch: getting attributes of
>`/data/build/tmp/ISO/packages/LYNX/usr/lib/lynx.cfg': No such file or
>directory
>touch: getting attributes of `/data/build/tmp/ISO/initrdtree/etc': No
>such file or directory
>Can I ignore these messages?  Or is something wrong?

You can ignore this, those are just "cosmetic errors".
The missing libraries are included in the package and the second part a=
re
just errors because of symlinks.

Nobody bothered until now to "fix" it.

Heiko

=

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] make install - warnings or errors?

[Heiko Z. <hz...@pr...>]

On 05/02/2003 02:27:11 PM Bruce Smith wrote:
>Now, muddling through the "install" script ...  CIPE compiles a kernel=

>module.  Since this is going to be an optional package, where do I put=

>the module?  $WORKDIR/tmp/lib/modules/${KERNELVERSION}/misc/  ???

Not sure if this is true (can't look it up at the moment), but put it i=
n:
$CDDIR/lib/modules/${KERNELVERSION}/misc

Look at scripts like e100 and freeswan, they both use modules too.

>If I understand correctly, that would make it untar if the optional
>package is selected.  But, will that cause problems if depmod is run
>before the package is untar'ed?  (or is depmod run later in the boot?)=


The modules HAVE to be on the CD and outside the package.
Otherwise depmod will fail (as you suspected).

Heiko

T.G.I.F !!!
=

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] make install - warnings or errors?

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

> The modules HAVE to be on the CD and outside the package.
> Otherwise depmod will fail (as you suspected).

OK, I think I have the install working for CIPE now.

I suppose you'd like me to actually burn a CDR and try CIPE 
before I send you the updates for CVS?  ;-)

I just ran across something that might make DL more secure:
http://newsforge.com/newsforge/03/05/02/1914223.shtml?tid=23
Maybe if 2.4.21 is released before DL 0.6 is released ... FWIW.

--
Thanks, Bruce.

[Devil-linux-develop] releasing CIPE and link to Exec Shield (was Re: [Devil-linux-develop] make install - warnings or errors?)

[Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...>]

Bruce Smith wrote:
> 
> OK, I think I have the install working for CIPE now.
> 
> I suppose you'd like me to actually burn a CDR and try CIPE 
> before I send you the updates for CVS?  ;-)

Would be good. But actually you could submit your stuff right
now to Heiko and me because you'll be the only one using this
stuff and we can always integrate patches later.

> 
> I just ran across something that might make DL more secure:
> http://newsforge.com/newsforge/03/05/02/1914223.shtml?tid=23
> Maybe if 2.4.21 is released before DL 0.6 is released ... FWIW.

We'll see if this stuff proofs to be stable enough.


-- 
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock
____________________________________________________________________
Friedrich Lobenstock                       Linux Services Lobenstock
URL: http://www.lsl.at/                         Email: fl...@fl...
____________________________________________________________________

Re: [Devil-linux-develop] make install - warnings or errors?

[Bruce S. <bw...@ar...>]

> >OK, I ran a "make build" with a limited selections of packages,
> 
> It's about time. ;-)

Well, I really ran it yesterday.  :-)

> >then I got my new CIPE to build using:  "./build.sh build opt=cipe"
> 
> cool!

Now, muddling through the "install" script ...  CIPE compiles a kernel
module.  Since this is going to be an optional package, where do I put
the module?  $WORKDIR/tmp/lib/modules/${KERNELVERSION}/misc/  ???

If I understand correctly, that would make it untar if the optional
package is selected.  But, will that cause problems if depmod is run
before the package is untar'ed?  (or is depmod run later in the boot?)

> >Can I ignore these messages?  Or is something wrong?
> 
> You can ignore this, those are just "cosmetic errors".

That's what I thought since the make didn't abort.
Just checking ...   :-)

--
Thanks, Bruce.