Menu
▾
▴
devil-linux-develop — developer discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(156) |
Dec
(123) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(130) |
Feb
(156) |
Mar
(162) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(97) |
Jun
(127) |
Jul
(58) |
Aug
(81) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(133) |
Apr
(152) |
May
(151) |
Jun
(232) |
Jul
(320) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(271) |
Oct
(536) |
Nov
(301) |
Dec
(393) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(393) |
Feb
(184) |
Mar
(314) |
Apr
(225) |
May
(139) |
Jun
(77) |
Jul
(87) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(139) |
Oct
(50) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(63) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(80) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(36) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(34) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(9) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(14) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-09-02 18:41:53
|
> >>>I started a fresh compile last night. Updated CVS & source, new LFS, > >>>mrproper, and it aborted in prepare: > >>> > >>>/data/build/tmp/LOGS/build/prepare: > >>> > >>>applying patch: /data/build/tmp/kernel-patches-2.4/IMQ-01-kernel-2.4.22-through-to-2.4.25-pre6.diff > >>>patching file Documentation/Configure.help > >>>... > >>>patching file include/linux/sysctl.h > >>>Hunk #1 FAILED at 128. > >>>1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/sysctl.h.rej > >>>patching file kernel/sysctl.c > >>>Hunk #1 succeeded at 128 (offset 1 line). > >>>... > >>> > >>> > >>I did this a couple times lately and it worked fine.... > >>You're using 1.3, correct? > >> > >> > > > >Yes, 1.3. I just did a new LFS, mrproper, and it aborted again in the > >same place. > > > > > OK, I'll try to reproduce the problem. FWIW, the problem seems to be in: linux-2.4.26-i2c-2.8.4.patch - BS |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-09-02 18:03:27
|
Bruce Smith wrote: >>>I started a fresh compile last night. Updated CVS & source, new LFS, >>>mrproper, and it aborted in prepare: >>> >>>/data/build/tmp/LOGS/build/prepare: >>> >>>applying patch: /data/build/tmp/kernel-patches-2.4/IMQ-01-kernel-2.4.22-through-to-2.4.25-pre6.diff >>>patching file Documentation/Configure.help >>>... >>>patching file include/linux/sysctl.h >>>Hunk #1 FAILED at 128. >>>1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/sysctl.h.rej >>>patching file kernel/sysctl.c >>>Hunk #1 succeeded at 128 (offset 1 line). >>>... >>> >>> >>I did this a couple times lately and it worked fine.... >>You're using 1.3, correct? >> >> > >Yes, 1.3. I just did a new LFS, mrproper, and it aborted again in the >same place. > > OK, I'll try to reproduce the problem. cu Heiko |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-09-02 17:42:23
|
> >I started a fresh compile last night. Updated CVS & source, new LFS, > >mrproper, and it aborted in prepare: > > > >/data/build/tmp/LOGS/build/prepare: > > > >applying patch: /data/build/tmp/kernel-patches-2.4/IMQ-01-kernel-2.4.22-through-to-2.4.25-pre6.diff > >patching file Documentation/Configure.help > >... > >patching file include/linux/sysctl.h > >Hunk #1 FAILED at 128. > >1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/sysctl.h.rej > >patching file kernel/sysctl.c > >Hunk #1 succeeded at 128 (offset 1 line). > >... > > I did this a couple times lately and it worked fine.... > You're using 1.3, correct? Yes, 1.3. I just did a new LFS, mrproper, and it aborted again in the same place. - BS |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-09-02 15:18:11
|
Bruce Smith wrote: >I started a fresh compile last night. Updated CVS & source, new LFS, >mrproper, and it aborted in prepare: > >/data/build/tmp/LOGS/build/prepare: > >applying patch: /data/build/tmp/kernel-patches-2.4/IMQ-01-kernel-2.4.22-through-to-2.4.25-pre6.diff >patching file Documentation/Configure.help >... >patching file include/linux/sysctl.h >Hunk #1 FAILED at 128. >1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/sysctl.h.rej >patching file kernel/sysctl.c >Hunk #1 succeeded at 128 (offset 1 line). >... > > I did this a couple times lately and it worked fine.... You're using 1.3, correct? Heiko |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-09-02 13:29:08
|
I started a fresh compile last night. Updated CVS & source, new LFS, mrproper, and it aborted in prepare: /data/build/tmp/LOGS/build/prepare: applying patch: /data/build/tmp/kernel-patches-2.4/IMQ-01-kernel-2.4.22-through-to-2.4.25-pre6.diff patching file Documentation/Configure.help ... patching file include/linux/sysctl.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 128. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/linux/sysctl.h.rej patching file kernel/sysctl.c Hunk #1 succeeded at 128 (offset 1 line). ... - BS |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-09-02 13:19:00
|
Bugs item #1010033, was opened at 2004-08-16 09:34 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by smiley73 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=1010033&group_id=34096 Category: Package >Group: v1.3 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73) >Assigned to: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73) Summary: postfix is missing sasl support Initial Comment: add missing code to postfix script, to include sasl support when cyrus-sasl is available ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=1010033&group_id=34096 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-09-01 00:52:56
|
Feature Requests item #1020087, was opened at 2004-08-31 19:52 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=1020087&group_id=34096 Category: Base System Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: add mktemp Initial Comment: http://www.mktemp.org/mktemp/ mktemp takes an optional filename template and overwrites a portion of it to create a unique filename. It will then create a temporary file or directory for the user, safe from file creation races. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=1020087&group_id=34096 |
|
From: Diego T. <dt...@co...> - 2004-08-31 23:01:09
|
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 03:33:00AM +0200, Michael Bielicki wrote: > :) For larger installs we use whitebox on Opterons but or the > mini-itx'es I want to use devil-linux on a usb pen :) i'm running one mini-itx board (CL10000) with the same configuration (usb pen as the boot device) as a fileserver, and a couple of smaller ones (600?) as routers/firewalls. the only problem was some incompatibility between an old kernel and the itx board that raised when using samba intesively... -- -- gnupg keyfingerprint -- 48AF 5BF9 8F54 2966 64CC 2327 7CD0 DD91 B09D 5799 -- Use of a keyboard or mouse may be linked to serious injuries or disorders. Diego Torres - dtorres at anthalia dot org - Madrid / España |
|
From: Diego T. <dt...@co...> - 2004-08-31 22:59:01
|
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 08:46:36AM -0400, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > > >1. Different distrubution as per ur suggestion > > > I know that all the SuSE version work fine with DL. add all the debian flavours to the list :) -- -- gnupg keyfingerprint -- 48AF 5BF9 8F54 2966 64CC 2327 7CD0 DD91 B09D 5799 -- Use of a keyboard or mouse may be linked to serious injuries or disorders. Diego Torres - dtorres at anthalia dot org - Madrid / España |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-08-31 12:46:17
|
Hey, >I am willing to use some other distribution also, which one do you suggest ? > >I am attaching some info on exec shield. > >Let me know which path do we take from here on : > >1. Different distrubution as per ur suggestion > > I know that all the SuSE version work fine with DL. >2. Tweaking Redhat 9.0 for DEVIL. > > Let's try this first, since it's easier: --- snip --- >There is a new boot-time kernel command line option called exec-shield=, >which has 4 values. Each value represents a different level of security: > > exec-shield=0 - always-disabled > exec-shield=1 - default disabled, except binaries that enable it > exec-shield=2 - default enabled, except binaries that disable it > exec-shield=3 - always-enabled > >the current patch defaults to 'exec-shield=2'. The security level can also >be changed runtime, by writing the level into /proc: > > echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield > --- snap --- Disable it via one of those methods and try again. But please start from scratch ( nwe lfssystem, make mrproper, etc.), since we don't know if the rest of the system is OK. cu Heiko |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2004-08-31 12:25:54
|
Bugs item #1002352, was opened at 2004-08-02 19:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by smiley73 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=1002352&group_id=34096 Category: Base System Group: v1.2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 7 Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73) >Assigned to: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73) Summary: cdrom not found after copy etc.tar.bz2 Initial Comment: the cdrom/media is not found, during the first boot of DL with an empty config media, when the system copies the etc.tar.bz2 on it. after a reboot the system comes up fine ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73) Date: 2004-08-31 07:25 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112133 updated busybox to the latest version ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73) Date: 2004-08-07 02:39 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=112133 The problem is the busybox release. The latest one fixes the problem, but has itself an issue with escaped characters. This is fixed in the latest CVS version and added to 1.3. Needs some more testing before it can go into 1.2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=1002352&group_id=34096 |
|
From: Ashwin M. <as...@ac...> - 2004-08-31 09:29:53
|
----- Original Message ----- From: "Heiko Zuerker" <he...@zu...> To: <dev...@li...> Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 6:32 AM Subject: Re: Fw: [Devil-linux-develop] Logfiles from failed Compile > Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > > Ashwin Mansinghka wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> Please find the mail with logfiles. > >> > >> with Regards, > >> ASHWIN > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ashwin Mansinghka" > >> <as...@ac...> > >> To: <dev...@li...> > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:07 PM > >> Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Logfiles from failed Compile > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> I'm missing the logfiles from the "make build" part, can you provide > >>>> those please? > >>>> > >>> > >>> Please find attached the logfiles. In the dir you will also find the > >>> > >> > >> errors > >> > >> > >>> reported by mxser, cipe and nbd and "make dist". I had to unselect the > >>> mxser, cipe and ndb to complete the compile at least for once. > >>> > >>> You can again observe that the following are failing: > >>> > >>> 1. mxser compilation under "make build" > >>> 2. cipe compilation under "make build" > >>> 3. nbd compilation under "make build" > >>> 4. make iso failing - becasue it cannot find "mkisofs" > >>> 5. the error as reported by "make dist" > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> Which distribution are you using on your compile host? > >>>> > >>> > >>> I am using the standard Redhat 9.0 on the host machine. The > >>> "mkisofs" is > >>> available at /usr/bin/mkisofs on the host, if that is what the build is > >>> looking for. The linux kernel files are located at /usr/src/linux-2.4 > >>> > >> > > > > I'm not familiar with RH 9.0, but does it also have that pageexec > > kernel security stuff ? > > Could you try to use a different distribution ? > > I mean execshield, not pageexec.... > I am willing to use some other distribution also, which one do you suggest ? I am attaching some info on exec shield. Let me know which path do we take from here on : 1. Different distrubution as per ur suggestion 2. Tweaking Redhat 9.0 for DEVIL. with Regards, ASHWIN |
|
From: Tim T. <t....@co...> - 2004-08-31 03:49:36
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Ashwin Mansinghka wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please find the mail with logfiles. >> >> with Regards, >> ASHWIN >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ashwin Mansinghka" >> <as...@ac...> >> To: <dev...@li...> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:07 PM >> Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Logfiles from failed Compile >> >> >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>>> I'm missing the logfiles from the "make build" part, can you provide >>>> those please? >>>> >>> >>> Please find attached the logfiles. In the dir you will also find the >>> >> >> errors >> >> >>> reported by mxser, cipe and nbd and "make dist". I had to unselect the >>> mxser, cipe and ndb to complete the compile at least for once. >>> >>> You can again observe that the following are failing: >>> >>> 1. mxser compilation under "make build" >>> 2. cipe compilation under "make build" >>> 3. nbd compilation under "make build" >>> 4. make iso failing - becasue it cannot find "mkisofs" >>> 5. the error as reported by "make dist" >>> >>> >>> >>>> Which distribution are you using on your compile host? >>>> >>> >>> I am using the standard Redhat 9.0 on the host machine. The >>> "mkisofs" is >>> available at /usr/bin/mkisofs on the host, if that is what the build is >>> looking for. The linux kernel files are located at /usr/src/linux-2.4 >>> >> > > I'm not familiar with RH 9.0, but does it also have that pageexec > kernel security stuff ? > Could you try to use a different distribution ? > > Heiko I've had good success with Knoppix 3.4 - nothing could be easier! Run it right off CD... The only thing you need to do is to make sure you mount the harddisk partition you want to run the LFS on with 'dev' option, as it defaults to 'nodev' and will give you strange errors about "can't write/dev/null" during the build. Tim |
|
From: Michael B. <Mic...@Ta...> - 2004-08-31 01:33:13
|
will setup a suse 9.1 tomorrow to try again. My project is to make a PBX with asterisk in minit-itx boxes. We want to sell this to companies here :) For larger installs we use whitebox on Opterons but or the mini-itx'es I want to use devil-linux on a usb pen :) cheers Michael On Tue, 2004-08-31 at 02:34, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Michael Bielicki wrote: > > >On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 22:46, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > > > > >>Michael Bielicki wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>Whiteboxlinux (RHAS 3.0 clone) > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>Not sure about it, does it have any kind of special kernel level > >>security checks? > >> > >> > >Probably. I will setup a redhat 7.2 just for the task of compiling devil > >:) Since we will use it for our PBX systems that we want to sell from > >next week based on devil and asterisk I need to get it done :) > >Thx for the nice system, the testing I did was really promising. > > > > > Is it working now? > > Do you have some more information about your project? > > Heiko > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-08-31 01:05:20
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Ashwin Mansinghka wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Please find the mail with logfiles. >> >> with Regards, >> ASHWIN >> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ashwin Mansinghka" >> <as...@ac...> >> To: <dev...@li...> >> Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:07 PM >> Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Logfiles from failed Compile >> >> >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> >>>> I'm missing the logfiles from the "make build" part, can you provide >>>> those please? >>>> >>> >>> Please find attached the logfiles. In the dir you will also find the >>> >> >> errors >> >> >>> reported by mxser, cipe and nbd and "make dist". I had to unselect the >>> mxser, cipe and ndb to complete the compile at least for once. >>> >>> You can again observe that the following are failing: >>> >>> 1. mxser compilation under "make build" >>> 2. cipe compilation under "make build" >>> 3. nbd compilation under "make build" >>> 4. make iso failing - becasue it cannot find "mkisofs" >>> 5. the error as reported by "make dist" >>> >>> >>> >>>> Which distribution are you using on your compile host? >>>> >>> >>> I am using the standard Redhat 9.0 on the host machine. The >>> "mkisofs" is >>> available at /usr/bin/mkisofs on the host, if that is what the build is >>> looking for. The linux kernel files are located at /usr/src/linux-2.4 >>> >> > > I'm not familiar with RH 9.0, but does it also have that pageexec > kernel security stuff ? > Could you try to use a different distribution ? I mean execshield, not pageexec.... Heiko |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-08-31 00:40:20
|
Ashwin Mansinghka wrote: >Hi, > >Please find the mail with logfiles. > >with Regards, >ASHWIN > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Ashwin Mansinghka" <as...@ac...> >To: <dev...@li...> >Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:07 PM >Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Logfiles from failed Compile > > > > >>Hi, >> >> >> >>>I'm missing the logfiles from the "make build" part, can you provide >>>those please? >>> >>> >>Please find attached the logfiles. In the dir you will also find the >> >> >errors > > >>reported by mxser, cipe and nbd and "make dist". I had to unselect the >>mxser, cipe and ndb to complete the compile at least for once. >> >>You can again observe that the following are failing: >> >>1. mxser compilation under "make build" >>2. cipe compilation under "make build" >>3. nbd compilation under "make build" >>4. make iso failing - becasue it cannot find "mkisofs" >>5. the error as reported by "make dist" >> >> >> >>>Which distribution are you using on your compile host? >>> >>> >>I am using the standard Redhat 9.0 on the host machine. The "mkisofs" is >>available at /usr/bin/mkisofs on the host, if that is what the build is >>looking for. The linux kernel files are located at /usr/src/linux-2.4 >> >> I'm not familiar with RH 9.0, but does it also have that pageexec kernel security stuff ? Could you try to use a different distribution ? Heiko |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-08-31 00:36:27
|
Michael Bielicki wrote: >On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 22:46, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > >>Michael Bielicki wrote: >> >> >> >>>Whiteboxlinux (RHAS 3.0 clone) >>> >>> >>> >>Not sure about it, does it have any kind of special kernel level >>security checks? >> >> >Probably. I will setup a redhat 7.2 just for the task of compiling devil >:) Since we will use it for our PBX systems that we want to sell from >next week based on devil and asterisk I need to get it done :) >Thx for the nice system, the testing I did was really promising. > > Is it working now? Do you have some more information about your project? Heiko |
|
From: Michael B. <Mic...@ta...> - 2004-08-29 06:50:40
|
On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 22:46, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > Michael Bielicki wrote: > > >Whiteboxlinux (RHAS 3.0 clone) > > > > > Not sure about it, does it have any kind of special kernel level > security checks? Probably. I will setup a redhat 7.2 just for the task of compiling devil :) Since we will use it for our PBX systems that we want to sell from next week based on devil and asterisk I need to get it done :) Thx for the nice system, the testing I did was really promising. > > >2GB RAM > >2 * 2.2GHz Athlon MP > >800 GB Diskspace, RAID 1+0 > > > >should do no ? > > > > > Yes that should do it. > > >and yes I have it also without that but only for a short time. > > > > > > Do you mean the build system without your modifications works? > > Heiko > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop |
|
From: Diego T. <dt...@co...> - 2004-08-28 18:22:30
|
On Sat, Aug 28, 2004 at 09:36:56AM +0530, Ashwin Mansinghka wrote: > > My objective is to atleast once, make a complete compile and test an iso > before moving on with other things. as a temporary measure, you could try the latest cvs version (1.3). it works ok if you don't select ebtables for compiling... -- -- gnupg keyfingerprint -- 48AF 5BF9 8F54 2966 64CC 2327 7CD0 DD91 B09D 5799 -- Use of a keyboard or mouse may be linked to serious injuries or disorders. Diego Torres - dtorres at anthalia dot org - Madrid / España |
|
From: Ashwin M. <as...@ac...> - 2004-08-28 04:07:38
|
Hi, No probs, no hard feelings. That's ok. My objective is to atleast once, make a complete compile and test an iso before moving on with other things. with Regards, ASHWIN ----- Original Message ----- From: "Heiko Zuerker" <he...@zu...> To: <dev...@li...> Sent: Saturday, August 28, 2004 6:29 AM Subject: Re: Fw: [Devil-linux-develop] Logfiles from failed Compile > Hey, > > sorry but my schedule currently doesn't allow me to look more into your > problem. > I should have more time next week. > > cu > Heiko > > Ashwin Mansinghka wrote: > > >Hi Heiko, > > > >Just a reminder message. > > > >The original message as a reply to your queris is appended as below. > > > >with Regards, > >ASHWIN > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Ashwin Mansinghka" <as...@ac...> > >To: <dev...@li...> > >Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 1:20 PM > >Subject: Re: Fw: [Devil-linux-develop] Logfiles from failed Compile > > > > > > > > > >>Hi, > >> > >> > >>>I looked over you logfiles and can't find a problem. > >>>The only thing I saw is that cdrecord complained about some kernel > >>> > >>> > >>includes. > >> > >>Please read my mail again. the mxser, cipe and nbd fail during the "make > >>build". The logs of such failures are also incuded in the logfile I have > >>sent you so far. > >> > >> > >> > >>>Can you send me your .config file, then I try to compile a system with > >>> > >>> > >it. > > > > > >>I am sending the same in my next email > >> > >> > >> > >>>Which Linux distribution are you using on your compile host? > >>> > >>> > >>Please read my mail again, it explained below. > >> > >> > >> > >>>Which DL version do you try to compile? 1.2 ? 1.3 ? > >>> > >>> > >>1.2 > >> > >>with Regards, > >>ASHWIN > >> > >> > >> > >>>Heiko > >>> > >>>Ashwin Mansinghka wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>>Hi, > >>>> > >>>>Please find the mail with logfiles. > >>>> > >>>>with Regards, > >>>>ASHWIN > >>>> > >>>>----- Original Message ----- > >>>>From: "Ashwin Mansinghka" <as...@ac...> > >>>>To: <dev...@li...> > >>>>Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:07 PM > >>>>Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Logfiles from failed Compile > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Hi, > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>I'm missing the logfiles from the "make build" part, can you provide > >>>>>>those please? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>Please find attached the logfiles. In the dir you will also find the > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>errors > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>reported by mxser, cipe and nbd and "make dist". I had to unselect the > >>>>>mxser, cipe and ndb to complete the compile at least for once. > >>>>> > >>>>>You can again observe that the following are failing: > >>>>> > >>>>>1. mxser compilation under "make build" > >>>>>2. cipe compilation under "make build" > >>>>>3. nbd compilation under "make build" > >>>>>4. make iso failing - becasue it cannot find "mkisofs" > >>>>>5. the error as reported by "make dist" > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>Which distribution are you using on your compile host? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>I am using the standard Redhat 9.0 on the host machine. The "mkisofs" > >>>>> > >>>>> > >is > > > > > >>>>>available at /usr/bin/mkisofs on the host, if that is what the build > >>>>> > >>>>> > >is > > > > > >>>>>looking for. The linux kernel files are located at /usr/src/linux-2.4 > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>which > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>is a link to the directory /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-8. > >>>>> > >>>>>Hope this helps. > >>>>> > >>>>>Please do get back with your analysis. > >>>>> > >>>>>I have used latest from CVS i.e. updated on the 24th and compiled on > >>>>> > >>>>> > >the > > > > > >>>>>25th. > >>>>> > >>>>>with Regards, > >>>>>ASHWIN > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>>------------------------------------------------------- > >>>SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media > >>>100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 > >>>Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. > >>>http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 > >>>_______________________________________________ > >>>Devil-linux-develop mailing list > >>>Dev...@li... > >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > >>> > >>> > >>> > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------- > >This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > >FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > >Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click > >_______________________________________________ > >Devil-linux-develop mailing list > >Dev...@li... > >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-08-28 01:01:22
|
Hey, sorry but my schedule currently doesn't allow me to look more into your problem. I should have more time next week. cu Heiko Ashwin Mansinghka wrote: >Hi Heiko, > >Just a reminder message. > >The original message as a reply to your queris is appended as below. > >with Regards, >ASHWIN > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Ashwin Mansinghka" <as...@ac...> >To: <dev...@li...> >Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 1:20 PM >Subject: Re: Fw: [Devil-linux-develop] Logfiles from failed Compile > > > > >>Hi, >> >> >>>I looked over you logfiles and can't find a problem. >>>The only thing I saw is that cdrecord complained about some kernel >>> >>> >>includes. >> >>Please read my mail again. the mxser, cipe and nbd fail during the "make >>build". The logs of such failures are also incuded in the logfile I have >>sent you so far. >> >> >> >>>Can you send me your .config file, then I try to compile a system with >>> >>> >it. > > >>I am sending the same in my next email >> >> >> >>>Which Linux distribution are you using on your compile host? >>> >>> >>Please read my mail again, it explained below. >> >> >> >>>Which DL version do you try to compile? 1.2 ? 1.3 ? >>> >>> >>1.2 >> >>with Regards, >>ASHWIN >> >> >> >>>Heiko >>> >>>Ashwin Mansinghka wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>Hi, >>>> >>>>Please find the mail with logfiles. >>>> >>>>with Regards, >>>>ASHWIN >>>> >>>>----- Original Message ----- >>>>From: "Ashwin Mansinghka" <as...@ac...> >>>>To: <dev...@li...> >>>>Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:07 PM >>>>Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Logfiles from failed Compile >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Hi, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>I'm missing the logfiles from the "make build" part, can you provide >>>>>>those please? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>Please find attached the logfiles. In the dir you will also find the >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>errors >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>reported by mxser, cipe and nbd and "make dist". I had to unselect the >>>>>mxser, cipe and ndb to complete the compile at least for once. >>>>> >>>>>You can again observe that the following are failing: >>>>> >>>>>1. mxser compilation under "make build" >>>>>2. cipe compilation under "make build" >>>>>3. nbd compilation under "make build" >>>>>4. make iso failing - becasue it cannot find "mkisofs" >>>>>5. the error as reported by "make dist" >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Which distribution are you using on your compile host? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>I am using the standard Redhat 9.0 on the host machine. The "mkisofs" >>>>> >>>>> >is > > >>>>>available at /usr/bin/mkisofs on the host, if that is what the build >>>>> >>>>> >is > > >>>>>looking for. The linux kernel files are located at /usr/src/linux-2.4 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>which >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>is a link to the directory /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-8. >>>>> >>>>>Hope this helps. >>>>> >>>>>Please do get back with your analysis. >>>>> >>>>>I have used latest from CVS i.e. updated on the 24th and compiled on >>>>> >>>>> >the > > >>>>>25th. >>>>> >>>>>with Regards, >>>>>ASHWIN >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>>------------------------------------------------------- >>>SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media >>>100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 >>>Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. >>>http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 >>>_______________________________________________ >>>Devil-linux-develop mailing list >>>Dev...@li... >>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop >>> >>> >>> > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop >FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! >Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 today. >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click >_______________________________________________ >Devil-linux-develop mailing list >Dev...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > > > |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-08-28 00:55:23
|
DONE Heiko Arnaud Gomes-do-Vale wrote: >Hi, > >The current update_src script does not list the public mirror at >Ircam. Here is the patch I use: > >Index: update_src >=================================================================== >RCS file: /cvsroot/devil-linux/build/update_src,v >retrieving revision 1.35 >diff -u -r1.35 update_src >--- update_src 4 Aug 2004 17:58:01 -0000 1.35 >+++ update_src 27 Aug 2004 15:57:54 -0000 >@@ -45,6 +45,10 @@ > ftps[5]="http://www.devil-linux.us" > ftpd[5]="/pub/devel/sources/$VERSION/" > >+menu[6]="Ircam Paris/France" >+ftps[6]="http://mirrors.ircam.fr" >+ftpd[6]="/pub/devil-linux/devel/sources/$VERSION/" >+ > # the internal mirrors (mostly used by specific developers) > > menu[96]="generic internal mirror" > > > > |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-08-27 20:50:19
|
Michael Bielicki wrote: >Whiteboxlinux (RHAS 3.0 clone) > > Not sure about it, does it have any kind of special kernel level security checks? >2GB RAM >2 * 2.2GHz Athlon MP >800 GB Diskspace, RAID 1+0 > >should do no ? > > Yes that should do it. >and yes I have it also without that but only for a short time. > > Do you mean the build system without your modifications works? Heiko |
|
From: Ashwin M. <as...@ac...> - 2004-08-27 16:54:53
|
Hi Heiko, Just a reminder message. The original message as a reply to your queris is appended as below. with Regards, ASHWIN ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ashwin Mansinghka" <as...@ac...> To: <dev...@li...> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 1:20 PM Subject: Re: Fw: [Devil-linux-develop] Logfiles from failed Compile > Hi, > > > > I looked over you logfiles and can't find a problem. > > The only thing I saw is that cdrecord complained about some kernel > includes. > > Please read my mail again. the mxser, cipe and nbd fail during the "make > build". The logs of such failures are also incuded in the logfile I have > sent you so far. > > > > > Can you send me your .config file, then I try to compile a system with it. > > I am sending the same in my next email > > > Which Linux distribution are you using on your compile host? > > Please read my mail again, it explained below. > > > Which DL version do you try to compile? 1.2 ? 1.3 ? > > 1.2 > > with Regards, > ASHWIN > > > > > Heiko > > > > Ashwin Mansinghka wrote: > > > > >Hi, > > > > > >Please find the mail with logfiles. > > > > > >with Regards, > > >ASHWIN > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "Ashwin Mansinghka" <as...@ac...> > > >To: <dev...@li...> > > >Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2004 11:07 PM > > >Subject: Re: [Devil-linux-develop] Logfiles from failed Compile > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >>Hi, > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>I'm missing the logfiles from the "make build" part, can you provide > > >>>those please? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>Please find attached the logfiles. In the dir you will also find the > > >> > > >> > > >errors > > > > > > > > >>reported by mxser, cipe and nbd and "make dist". I had to unselect the > > >>mxser, cipe and ndb to complete the compile at least for once. > > >> > > >>You can again observe that the following are failing: > > >> > > >>1. mxser compilation under "make build" > > >>2. cipe compilation under "make build" > > >>3. nbd compilation under "make build" > > >>4. make iso failing - becasue it cannot find "mkisofs" > > >>5. the error as reported by "make dist" > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>Which distribution are you using on your compile host? > > >>> > > >>> > > >>I am using the standard Redhat 9.0 on the host machine. The "mkisofs" is > > >>available at /usr/bin/mkisofs on the host, if that is what the build is > > >>looking for. The linux kernel files are located at /usr/src/linux-2.4 > > >> > > >> > > >which > > > > > > > > >>is a link to the directory /usr/src/linux-2.4.20-8. > > >> > > >>Hope this helps. > > >> > > >>Please do get back with your analysis. > > >> > > >>I have used latest from CVS i.e. updated on the 24th and compiled on the > > >>25th. > > >> > > >>with Regards, > > >>ASHWIN > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > SF.Net email is sponsored by Shop4tech.com-Lowest price on Blank Media > > 100pk Sonic DVD-R 4x for only $29 -100pk Sonic DVD+R for only $33 > > Save 50% off Retail on Ink & Toner - Free Shipping and Free Gift. > > http://www.shop4tech.com/z/Inkjet_Cartridges/9_108_r285 > > _______________________________________________ > > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > > Dev...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > > > |
|
From: Arnaud Gomes-do-V. <Arn...@ir...> - 2004-08-27 16:18:28
|
Hi, The current update_src script does not list the public mirror at Ircam. Here is the patch I use: Index: update_src =================================================================== RCS file: /cvsroot/devil-linux/build/update_src,v retrieving revision 1.35 diff -u -r1.35 update_src --- update_src 4 Aug 2004 17:58:01 -0000 1.35 +++ update_src 27 Aug 2004 15:57:54 -0000 @@ -45,6 +45,10 @@ ftps[5]="http://www.devil-linux.us" ftpd[5]="/pub/devel/sources/$VERSION/" +menu[6]="Ircam Paris/France" +ftps[6]="http://mirrors.ircam.fr" +ftpd[6]="/pub/devil-linux/devel/sources/$VERSION/" + # the internal mirrors (mostly used by specific developers) menu[96]="generic internal mirror" -- Arnaud |
35 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
