Menu
▾
▴
devil-linux-develop — developer discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(156) |
Dec
(123) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(130) |
Feb
(156) |
Mar
(162) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(97) |
Jun
(127) |
Jul
(58) |
Aug
(81) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(133) |
Apr
(152) |
May
(151) |
Jun
(232) |
Jul
(320) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(271) |
Oct
(536) |
Nov
(301) |
Dec
(393) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(393) |
Feb
(184) |
Mar
(314) |
Apr
(225) |
May
(139) |
Jun
(77) |
Jul
(87) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(139) |
Oct
(50) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(63) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(80) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(36) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(34) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(9) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(14) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...> - 2003-10-20 17:00:24
|
Bruce Smith wrote on 20.10.2003 14:21 MET: >>Yes please write something up, your english is much better then mine. > > OK, if you (or others) could give me a list of items that should be > mentioned, (like Friedrich did), that would be very helpful. Maybe you can make up some clever text post it to the list and then we can start commenting on it and giving our own suggestions. Someone here in the marketing department? -- MfG / Regards Friedrich Lobenstock ____________________________________________________________________ Friedrich Lobenstock Linux Services Lobenstock URL: http://www.lsl.at/ Email: fl...@fl... ____________________________________________________________________ |
|
From: Heiko Z. <hz...@pr...> - 2003-10-20 15:54:29
|
On 10/20/2003 08:21:58 AM Bruce Smith wrote: >> >The perfect release date for DEVIL Linux 1.0 is Oct 31, or Hallowee= n! >> >Or the evening of Oct 30th (Devil's night)! :-) >> >> I think Halloween is more commonly known then Devil's night (though= I >> would prefer it). > >True. I would advertise the release date as Halloween, but really >upload the ISO's the night before. Kind of a "sneak preview". :-) Sure >> >It's a little less than two weeks, and will give us a chance to do >some >> >publicity. I think news sites will be more apt to pick up our pres= s >> >release(s) if we make a big deal about it happening on Halloween. >> > >> >Heiko, approve the date and I'll write up something. Other people >> >should feel free to write articles too. >> > >> Approved ! Release date will be October 31 ! > >Great! > >> Yes please write something up, your english is much better then mine= . > >OK, if you (or others) could give me a list of items that should be >mentioned, (like Friedrich did), that would be very helpful. Once I'm really awake, I do it. >> Anybody else wants to write something ? >> The only request we ( I ) have is, that it is ready for review by >Bruce >> and myself on October 29th. > >We might want to post some blurbs before then too. Good idea. >> >Heiko, you should compile 1.0-final a few days in advance so it's >ready >> >to go, just don't post it for download until 10/31. What ya think?= >> > >> Fully agreed. >> It's better to do it a few days earlier, since I had some problems >with >> the build machine last time. > >If you want help uploading, I have access to a lot of bandwidth. > >Or I can help compiling too, let me know ... I just do it on my Notebook, that's stable. Heiko = |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2003-10-20 15:53:24
|
> >>apache still runs as root, this needs to be fixed > > > >Yes, should be user and group "apache". > > > user and group www > Those are already existing in DL. OK, most other distros use "apache", but it doesn't really matter. I think all that is required is a couple lines in the config file: User www Group www > >Should probably create a logical volume for hard drive > >storage of the data. /var/www/ > > > I think that's more a problem if the administrator. Huh? I'm not following you (or maybe you're not following me? :) I'm talking about creating a LV name to store the Apache web site. http://www.devil-linux.org/newdoc/ch01s04.html#d0e568 Do you want to reuse one of other names, like /var/data ? Most distros store it in /var/www . - BS |
|
From: Heiko Z. <hz...@pr...> - 2003-10-20 15:27:41
|
On 10/20/2003 05:57:16 AM Roland Frei wrote: >hiiii > >>> is the RAID-read-balancing patch applied on devil ? >> What does it do ? >improves RAID-1 read performance by "balancing" reads across all >available >partitions (like RAID-0 striping). > > >> Where do we get it ? >all the patches and nowto is at: >http://www.linuxraid.org/ >the patch himself is at: >http://www.icon.fi/~mak/raid1/raid1readbalance-2.2.15-B2 > >> Anybody else wants it ? >it should nearly double the read speed :-) >who dont want fast raid ? ;-) OK that sounds good, as soon as I can get into sourceforge again, I'll = add it to the featuer requests. Heiko = |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2003-10-20 15:08:05
|
> did you try to update a 0.5 configuration ? > You should do it, before you add it to 1.0 I no longer have any 0.5 configs. Can someone send me their etc from a 0.5? - BS |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2003-10-20 14:08:41
|
> >Another message that hasn't showed up yet. > >I think we should consider adding this feature to 1.0 final. > > > You should add a warning, that i.e. keeping /etc/sysconfig/config will > screw other things up. > > It would also be good to keep a file /etc/sysconfig/config.new Would it be better to unconditionally omit copying /etc/sysconfig/config and display a message to "run setup" to rebuild it? I can do it either way. - BS |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2003-10-20 13:01:24
|
> >The perfect release date for DEVIL Linux 1.0 is Oct 31, or Halloween! > >Or the evening of Oct 30th (Devil's night)! :-) > > I think Halloween is more commonly known then Devil's night (though I > would prefer it). True. I would advertise the release date as Halloween, but really upload the ISO's the night before. Kind of a "sneak preview". :-) > >It's a little less than two weeks, and will give us a chance to do some > >publicity. I think news sites will be more apt to pick up our press > >release(s) if we make a big deal about it happening on Halloween. > > > >Heiko, approve the date and I'll write up something. Other people > >should feel free to write articles too. > > > Approved ! Release date will be October 31 ! Great! > Yes please write something up, your english is much better then mine. OK, if you (or others) could give me a list of items that should be mentioned, (like Friedrich did), that would be very helpful. > Anybody else wants to write something ? > The only request we ( I ) have is, that it is ready for review by Bruce > and myself on October 29th. We might want to post some blurbs before then too. > >Heiko, you should compile 1.0-final a few days in advance so it's ready > >to go, just don't post it for download until 10/31. What ya think? > > > Fully agreed. > It's better to do it a few days earlier, since I had some problems with > the build machine last time. If you want help uploading, I have access to a lot of bandwidth. Or I can help compiling too, let me know ... - BS |
|
From: Heiko Z. <hz...@pr...> - 2003-10-20 12:36:28
|
On 10/19/2003 09:15:21 PM Heiko Zuerker wrote: >Bruce Smith wrote: > >>Another message that hasn't showed up yet. >>I think we should consider adding this feature to 1.0 final. >> >> >You should add a warning, that i.e. keeping /etc/sysconfig/config will= >screw other things up. > >It would also be good to keep a file /etc/sysconfig/config.new did you try to update a 0.5 configuration ? You should do it, before you add it to 1.0 cya Heiko = |
|
From: Roland F. <rol...@dr...> - 2003-10-20 10:29:23
|
hiiii >> is the RAID-read-balancing patch applied on devil ? > What does it do ? improves RAID-1 read performance by "balancing" reads across all available partitions (like RAID-0 striping). > Where do we get it ? all the patches and nowto is at: http://www.linuxraid.org/ the patch himself is at: http://www.icon.fi/~mak/raid1/raid1readbalance-2.2.15-B2 > Anybody else wants it ? it should nearly double the read speed :-) who dont want fast raid ? ;-) roland |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2003-10-20 04:20:30
|
Bruce Smith wrote: >Another message that hasn't showed up yet. >I think we should consider adding this feature to 1.0 final. > > You should add a warning, that i.e. keeping /etc/sysconfig/config will screw other things up. It would also be good to keep a file /etc/sysconfig/config.new cya Heiko |
|
From: Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...> - 2003-10-20 02:59:06
|
Hej!
Heiko Zuerker wrote on 20.10.2003 03:10 MET:
> Approved ! Release date will be October 31 !
Devil Linux 1.0 Halloween Edition :-)
> Yes please write something up, your english is much better then mine.
>
> Anybody else wants to write something ?
> The only request we ( I ) have is, that it is ready for review by Bruce
> and myself on October 29th.
What we can mention is:
* kernel version (FreeSWAN and netfilter patches applied, maybe
mention some other important patch here)
* a lot new software (just mentioning the most important ones)
compiled with GCC stack smashing protector
* runs mostly from CD
* supports USB flash media as config storage
* can even be installed on usb flash and maybe other flash devices
* new build system for creating customized versions
--
MfG / Regards
Friedrich Lobenstock
____________________________________________________________________
Friedrich Lobenstock Linux Services Lobenstock
URL: http://www.lsl.at/ Email: fl...@fl...
____________________________________________________________________
|
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2003-10-20 02:19:49
|
Howdy ! Bruce Smith wrote: >The perfect release date for DEVIL Linux 1.0 is Oct 31, or Halloween! >Or the evening of Oct 30th (Devil's night)! :-) > I think Halloween is more commonly known then Devil's night (though I would prefer it). >Why didn't anyone thing of that before ... Duh! :-) > Yeah why not ? >It's a little less than two weeks, and will give us a chance to do some >publicity. I think news sites will be more apt to pick up our press >release(s) if we make a big deal about it happening on Halloween. > >Heiko, approve the date and I'll write up something. Other people >should feel free to write articles too. > Approved ! Release date will be October 31 ! Yes please write something up, your english is much better then mine. Anybody else wants to write something ? The only request we ( I ) have is, that it is ready for review by Bruce and myself on October 29th. >I know a fellow LUG member who works at OSDN (slashdot, newsforge, >sourceforge, linux.com, freshmeat, etc.) who told me before that he'd >help me get something posted. (assuming I can write something decent) > Cool ! Pay him a beer. ;-) >Heiko, you should compile 1.0-final a few days in advance so it's ready >to go, just don't post it for download until 10/31. What ya think? > > Fully agreed. It's better to do it a few days earlier, since I had some problems with the build machine last time. cya Heiko |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2003-10-20 01:24:35
|
Bruce Smith wrote: >>Initial Comment: >>apache still runs as root, this needs to be fixed >> >> > >Yes, should be user and group "apache". > user and group www Those are already existing in DL. >>can we get a common usable chroot working? >>(could be a problem with all the libs we need) >> >> > >The "home" (data) could be a problem too. >It may not fit into a ram disk. >May not be worth it ... > > > >>anything else we can do? >> >> > >Should probably create a logical volume for hard drive >storage of the data. /var/www/ > > I think that's more a problem if the administrator. cya Heiko |
|
From: Diego T. <dt...@co...> - 2003-10-20 01:09:27
|
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 01:43:37PM -0400, Bruce Smith wrote: > writable by root and the named process is running as user "named". > (even though I ran "chown named /etc/named" on the _real_ directory) > > It's amazing how much easier it is to find bugs in software when you > actually USE it! :-) Fixes will be committed soon, for 1.1 & 1.0. btw: it should be easier for you to use djbdns :) -- -- gnupg keyfingerprint -- 48AF 5BF9 8F54 2966 64CC 2327 7CD0 DD91 B09D 5799 -- Use of a keyboard or mouse may be linked to serious injuries or disorders. Diego Torres - dt...@co... - Madrid / España |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2003-10-20 00:58:28
|
Diego Torres wrote: >On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:16:32AM -0400, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > >>>(not picking on him, I just see Samba being in a different profile >>>that the firewall stuff) >>> >>> >>I would say we do it base on our best judgment. >>If a user really doesn't like how we selected it: get the build system and >>create your own version. >> >> > >thats what i do. i build a custom version of dl that fits my needs every month (more or less). I only include what i need on my firewall/network storage servers. > >I hope that this month i'll have enough time to build my first usb based release :) > > > I'm glad to hear that our users actually use this feature. ;-) cya Heiko |
|
From: Diego T. <dt...@co...> - 2003-10-20 00:31:41
|
On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:16:32AM -0400, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > >(not picking on him, I just see Samba being in a different profile > >that the firewall stuff) > > I would say we do it base on our best judgment. > If a user really doesn't like how we selected it: get the build system and > create your own version. thats what i do. i build a custom version of dl that fits my needs every month (more or less). I only include what i need on my firewall/network storage servers. I hope that this month i'll have enough time to build my first usb based release :) -- -- gnupg keyfingerprint -- 48AF 5BF9 8F54 2966 64CC 2327 7CD0 DD91 B09D 5799 -- Use of a keyboard or mouse may be linked to serious injuries or disorders. Diego Torres - dt...@co... - Madrid / España |
|
From: Diego T. <dt...@co...> - 2003-10-20 00:30:15
|
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 09:06:16AM -0400, Heiko Zuerker wrote: > >is the RAID-read-balancing patch applied on devil ? > > No. > > What does it do ? > Where do we get it ? > Anybody else wants it ? This could be useful, but two of the three questions above need to be answered first :) -- -- gnupg keyfingerprint -- 48AF 5BF9 8F54 2966 64CC 2327 7CD0 DD91 B09D 5799 -- Use of a keyboard or mouse may be linked to serious injuries or disorders. Diego Torres - dt...@co... - Madrid / España |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2003-10-19 18:52:35
|
The perfect release date for DEVIL Linux 1.0 is Oct 31, or Halloween! Or the evening of Oct 30th (Devil's night)! :-) Why didn't anyone thing of that before ... Duh! :-) It's a little less than two weeks, and will give us a chance to do some publicity. I think news sites will be more apt to pick up our press release(s) if we make a big deal about it happening on Halloween. Heiko, approve the date and I'll write up something. Other people should feel free to write articles too. I know a fellow LUG member who works at OSDN (slashdot, newsforge, sourceforge, linux.com, freshmeat, etc.) who told me before that he'd help me get something posted. (assuming I can write something decent) Heiko, you should compile 1.0-final a few days in advance so it's ready to go, just don't post it for download until 10/31. What ya think? - BS |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-10-19 16:23:21
|
Feature Requests item #826351, was opened at 2003-10-19 09:07 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=826351&group_id=34096 Category: Base System Group: Next Release Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Bruce Smith (blubdog) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Add SARG Initial Comment: Add SARG (Squid Analysis Report Generator) for squid log reports. http://web.onda.com.br/orso/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410646&aid=826351&group_id=34096 |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-10-19 13:22:28
|
Bugs item #826071, was opened at 2003-10-18 14:30 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by blubdog You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=826071&group_id=34096 Category: Package Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: apache security Initial Comment: apache still runs as root, this needs to be fixed can we get a common usable chroot working? (could be a problem with all the libs we need) anything else we can do? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Bruce Smith (blubdog) Date: 2003-10-19 09:01 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=778609 We should also create a logical volume for hard drive storage of the home/data/web-site: /var/www ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=826071&group_id=34096 |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2003-10-19 12:59:45
|
> Initial Comment: > apache still runs as root, this needs to be fixed Yes, should be user and group "apache". > can we get a common usable chroot working? > (could be a problem with all the libs we need) The "home" (data) could be a problem too. It may not fit into a ram disk. May not be worth it ... > anything else we can do? Should probably create a logical volume for hard drive storage of the data. /var/www/ - BS |
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2003-10-19 10:32:53
|
Bugs item #826071, was opened at 2003-10-18 13:30 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=826071&group_id=34096 Category: Package Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Heiko Zuerker (smiley73) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: apache security Initial Comment: apache still runs as root, this needs to be fixed can we get a common usable chroot working? (could be a problem with all the libs we need) anything else we can do? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=410643&aid=826071&group_id=34096 |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2003-10-19 05:28:12
|
Heiko Zuerker wrote: > > There are still some modules not compiled for it, we have to fix/add > that over time. imap is available now. Heiko |
|
From: <no...@fr...> - 2003-10-19 04:34:21
|
This email is to inform you about the release of version '1.2.12' of 'Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse' through freshmeat.net. All URLs and other useful information can be found at http://freshmeat.net/projects/dcc-source/ The changes in this release are as follows: This version now reports checksums in greylist embargoed mail to a DCC server while waiting for the embargo to expire. This can let the very first copy of spam be rejected. Project description: Distributed Checksum Clearinghouse (DCC) is a system of clients and servers that collect and count checksums related to mail messages. The counts can be used by SMTP servers and mail user agents to detect and reject bulk mail. DCC servers can exchange common checksums. The checksums include values that are "fuzzy", or constant across common variations in bulk messages. If you would like to cancel subscription to releases of this project, login to freshmeat.net and choose 'home' from the personal menubar at the top of the page. You'll be presented with a list of projects you're subscribed to in the right column, which you may cancel by highlighting the project in question and clicking the 'delete' button. Sincerely, freshmeat.net ____________________________| Advertising |____________________________ Got the debugger blues? Try Etnus TotalView, the Best Linux/UNIX debugger on the planet. With superior C++ support, the best thread debugging available, a great GUI, and more useful features than any other debugger, TotalView helps reveal bugs faster than any other debugger. And it provides more insight and analysis about your code and your data. So cure the debugger blues. Get your free 15-day trial at http://www.etnus.com/Download/demo-tv.html ____________________________| Advertising |____________________________ |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2003-10-18 19:45:05
|
hz...@zu... wrote: >this is just a test email if PHP + SquirrelMail works. > > I guess it worked. ;-) cya Heiko |
35 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
