Menu
▾
▴
devil-linux-develop — developer discussions
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(55) |
Oct
(44) |
Nov
(156) |
Dec
(123) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(130) |
Feb
(156) |
Mar
(162) |
Apr
(171) |
May
(97) |
Jun
(127) |
Jul
(58) |
Aug
(81) |
Sep
(86) |
Oct
(45) |
Nov
(41) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2003 |
Jan
(71) |
Feb
(87) |
Mar
(133) |
Apr
(152) |
May
(151) |
Jun
(232) |
Jul
(320) |
Aug
(237) |
Sep
(271) |
Oct
(536) |
Nov
(301) |
Dec
(393) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(393) |
Feb
(184) |
Mar
(314) |
Apr
(225) |
May
(139) |
Jun
(77) |
Jul
(87) |
Aug
(75) |
Sep
(139) |
Oct
(50) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(28) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(66) |
Feb
(63) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(14) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(21) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(29) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(10) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
(15) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(8) |
Sep
(9) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(3) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(35) |
Aug
(49) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(42) |
Nov
(44) |
Dec
(7) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
(80) |
May
(74) |
Jun
(29) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(24) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(23) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(27) |
Nov
(52) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(36) |
Feb
(29) |
Mar
(17) |
Apr
(28) |
May
(21) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
(28) |
Sep
(18) |
Oct
(6) |
Nov
(34) |
Dec
(16) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(18) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(9) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(16) |
Nov
(26) |
Dec
(17) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(6) |
Feb
(34) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(5) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(14) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(5) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(11) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: <hzu...@ra...> - 2004-02-06 21:12:37
|
On 02/06/2004 03:45:42 PM Friedrich Lobenstock wrote: >Bruce Smith wrote on 06.02.2004 21:28 MET: >> I've got postfix/clamav/spamassassin/sagator running on a test box and >> I've been forwarding myself spam and viruses to test it out. >> >> I sent myself the test Eicar virus signature that comes with comes >with >> sagator, and it caught it. I then sent the virus in a zip file, >gziped, >> bzip2'ed, and a zip file inside a zip file, and it caught them all. >> Then I sent the virus inside the .rar file supplied by sagator, and it >> did NOT catch it. The program unrar is on my DL box and runs fine. >> >> # whereis unrar >> unrar: /usr/bin/unrar >> >> What am I missing? Or is something broken? > >Try copying the rar file to this system. >What is the output of "file .....rar"? What if you run rar manually >on this file? Is unrar in the sagator chroot ? Does sagator expect it in a different path? Heiko |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-02-06 20:54:23
|
> > I've got postfix/clamav/spamassassin/sagator running on a test box and
> > I've been forwarding myself spam and viruses to test it out.
> >
> > I sent myself the test Eicar virus signature that comes with comes with
> > sagator, and it caught it. I then sent the virus in a zip file, gziped,
> > bzip2'ed, and a zip file inside a zip file, and it caught them all.
> > Then I sent the virus inside the .rar file supplied by sagator, and it
> > did NOT catch it. The program unrar is on my DL box and runs fine.
> >
> > # whereis unrar
> > unrar: /usr/bin/unrar
> >
> > What am I missing? Or is something broken?
>
> Try copying the rar file to this system.
It is the exact file I copied from:
.../lfssystem/data/build/tmp/sagator/test/pack/test.rar
These are files that sagator supplies for testing.
(along with other files containing virus sigs, which are all caught)
> What is the output of "file .....rar"? What if you run rar manually
> on this file?
# from my DL test box:
root@test:/tmp # file test.rar
test.rar: RAR archive data, v14, os: Unix
root@test:/tmp # unrar l test.rar
UNRAR 3.20 freeware Copyright (c) 1993-2003 Eugene Roshal
Archive test.rar
Name Size Packed Ratio Date Time Attr CRC Meth Ver
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
d 0 0 0% 02-07-03 13:03 drwxrwxr-x 00000000 m0 2.0
emptydir 0 0 0% 02-07-03 13:03 drwxrwxr-x 00000000 m0 2.0
useddir 0 0 0% 02-07-03 15:14 drwxrwxr-x 00000000 m0 2.0
file 9 21 100% 02-07-03 13:03 -rw-rw-r-- FFE2DDD2 m3b 2.9
empty 0 8 0% 02-07-03 13:03 -rw-rw-r-- 00000000 m3b 2.9
Eicar 178 172 96% 16-06-03 07:50 -rw-rw-r-- 38612FED m3b 2.9
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6 187 201 100%
root@test:/tmp #
|
|
From: Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...> - 2004-02-06 20:45:56
|
Bruce Smith wrote on 06.02.2004 21:28 MET: > I've got postfix/clamav/spamassassin/sagator running on a test box and > I've been forwarding myself spam and viruses to test it out. > > I sent myself the test Eicar virus signature that comes with comes with > sagator, and it caught it. I then sent the virus in a zip file, gziped, > bzip2'ed, and a zip file inside a zip file, and it caught them all. > Then I sent the virus inside the .rar file supplied by sagator, and it > did NOT catch it. The program unrar is on my DL box and runs fine. > > # whereis unrar > unrar: /usr/bin/unrar > > What am I missing? Or is something broken? Try copying the rar file to this system. What is the output of "file .....rar"? What if you run rar manually on this file? -- MfG / Regards Friedrich Lobenstock ____________________________________________________________________ Friedrich Lobenstock Linux Services Lobenstock URL: http://www.lsl.at/ Email: fl...@fl... ____________________________________________________________________ |
|
From: <hzu...@ra...> - 2004-02-06 20:31:19
|
On 02/06/2004 02:56:18 PM Bruce Smith wrote: >> > I rebooted and am wondering if the start order is correct? >> > It goes like this: >> > >> > clamav >> > postfix >> > spamd >> > sagator >> > >> > Shouldn't postfix be last? >> >> I didn't experience any problems with this order, it works fine for >me. > >It seems to work for me too. I was wondering what would happen if a >mail is received during bootup, right after postfix is started, before >spamd and/or sagator is started? Would it allow the virus/spam through? >Or cause other problems with postfix since sagator isn't running? The mail will be held until delivery is possible. For postfix it is like the receiving smtp server is down. Heiko |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-02-06 20:28:53
|
I've got postfix/clamav/spamassassin/sagator running on a test box and I've been forwarding myself spam and viruses to test it out. I sent myself the test Eicar virus signature that comes with comes with sagator, and it caught it. I then sent the virus in a zip file, gziped, bzip2'ed, and a zip file inside a zip file, and it caught them all. Then I sent the virus inside the .rar file supplied by sagator, and it did NOT catch it. The program unrar is on my DL box and runs fine. # whereis unrar unrar: /usr/bin/unrar What am I missing? Or is something broken? - BS |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-02-06 19:56:21
|
> > I rebooted and am wondering if the start order is correct? > > It goes like this: > > > > clamav > > postfix > > spamd > > sagator > > > > Shouldn't postfix be last? > > I didn't experience any problems with this order, it works fine for me. It seems to work for me too. I was wondering what would happen if a mail is received during bootup, right after postfix is started, before spamd and/or sagator is started? Would it allow the virus/spam through? Or cause other problems with postfix since sagator isn't running? - BS |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-02-06 19:50:23
|
>> > sagator will not start otherwise. >> >> Actually it will, when you have clamav running as daemon. >> That's the way I have set it up at home. > > OK, I'll change it back. > > I rebooted and am wondering if the start order is correct? > It goes like this: > > clamav > postfix > spamd > sagator > > Shouldn't postfix be last? I didn't experience any problems with this order, it works fine for me. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-02-06 19:22:14
|
> > sagator will not start otherwise. > > Actually it will, when you have clamav running as daemon. > That's the way I have set it up at home. OK, I'll change it back. I rebooted and am wondering if the start order is correct? It goes like this: clamav postfix spamd sagator Shouldn't postfix be last? - BS |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-02-06 18:51:21
|
> Update of /cvsroot/devil-linux/build/config/etc/sysconfig/jail > In directory > sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv8348/config/etc/sysconfig/jail > > Modified Files: > SAGATOR > Log Message: > sagator will not start otherwise. Actually it will, when you have clamav running as daemon. That's the way I have set it up at home. -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-02-06 13:41:18
|
> On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 14:33, Bruce Smith wrote: > >> I checked them in yesterday with a little manual work. >> Please make sure everything is correct in CVS. >> > > looks like all is ok :-) but will do next week (if i find some time) a > full rebuild again to check again, how many packages didn't compile with > kernel 2.6. Yeah use a fresh lfssystem and check out the Python compile. ;-) -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-02-06 13:31:21
|
Check that out: Data Center Linux: Executive Summary / Technical Capabilities Version 1.0 (pdf) The OSDL DCL Working Group captures, discusses, publishes and develops Linux capabilities required by demanding, enterprise-class applications such as high-end OLTP and Decision Support. The goal is to accelerate the use of Linux in enterprise-class data centers. The DCL Technical Capabilities v1.0 document is the work of current OSDL member companies and interested individuals. Together with industry leaders and end-users, the group identifies Linux capabilities and assembles them into a prioritized list. Each of the capabilities listed within the broad range in this document has been analyzed for applicability to Data Center Linux. At a future date, the contributors intend to drive a specific requirements document from this list of capabilities. (119 pages) http://www.osdl.org/lab_activities/data_center_linux/DCL_ExecSumm_TechCapabilities_1_0.pdf This is the main site: http://www.osdl.org/lab_activities/data_center_linux/ -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Oliver J. <oli...@mo...> - 2004-02-06 11:59:24
|
On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 14:33, Bruce Smith wrote: > I checked them in yesterday with a little manual work. > Please make sure everything is correct in CVS. > looks like all is ok :-) but will do next week (if i find some time) a full rebuild again to check again, how many packages didn't compile with kernel 2.6. thanx Oliver |
|
From: <no...@fr...> - 2004-02-06 11:40:01
|
This email is to inform you about the release of version '2.0.18-20040205' of 'Postfix' through freshmeat.net. All URLs and other useful information can be found at http://freshmeat.net/projects/postfix/ The changes in this release are as follows: This snapshot is an interim release that fixes a few problems that have surfaced since snapshot 20040122. Project description: Postfix is an attempt to provide an alternative to the widely-used Sendmail program. Postfix attempts to be fast, easy to administer, and hopefully secure, while at the same time being sendmail compatible enough to not upset your users. Trove categories: [Environment ] No Input/Output (Daemon) [Intended Audience ] End Users/Desktop [License ] OSI Approved :: IBM Public License [Topic ] Communications :: Email :: Mail Transport Agents If you would like to cancel subscription to releases of this project, login to freshmeat.net and choose 'home' from the personal menubar at the top of the page. You'll be presented with a list of projects and categories you're subscribed to in the right column, which you may cancel by highlighting the project or category in question and clicking the 'delete' button. Sincerely, freshmeat.net |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-02-05 13:33:39
|
> > > OK, I got it to work with the --ignore-whitespace patch option > > > (except for one, which I did manually). > > > > > > Next time, please _attach_ the patch file. > > > > ...if it's not possible to preserve the tabs I might want to add. > > Otherwise try to attach the patch without compressing it so one > > can view it inline. > > next time i send the patch inline and as attachment :-) > as i done before !!! Cool! :-) > i've sent bruce the patches again as file attachement for checkin, not > to the list... I checked them in yesterday with a little manual work. Please make sure everything is correct in CVS. > not a french one Whew! :-) - BS |
|
From: Oliver J. <oli...@mo...> - 2004-02-05 05:45:19
|
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 21:52, Friedrich Lobenstock wrote: > Bruce Smith wrote on 04.02.2004 21:44 MET: > >>>>Oliver, can you send me a actual patch (attachment)? > >>>>A copy/paste of the email piped to patch doesn't apply. > >>>>(I think it loses the tab characters or something). > >>> > >>>Do "Save-As" and than patch! > >> > >>I tried that and it still fails. I even looked at the saved file and > >>the email source - it contains no tabs (except in the SMTP headers). > >>I think the tabs were stripped at send time. > > > > > > OK, I got it to work with the --ignore-whitespace patch option > > (except for one, which I did manually). > > > > Next time, please _attach_ the patch file. > > ...if it's not possible to preserve the tabs I might want to add. > Otherwise try to attach the patch without compressing it so one > can view it inline. next time i send the patch inline and as attachment :-) as i done before !!! so its viewable for rfc and for apply... i'm not shure, that my mailers evolution/mozilla/outlook/squirrelmail will do something with inline text (replace tabs etc)... and i'm working at different locations with different workstations... i've sent bruce the patches again as file attachement for checkin, not to the list... not a french one |
|
From: Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...> - 2004-02-04 20:53:24
|
Bruce Smith wrote on 04.02.2004 21:44 MET: >>>>Oliver, can you send me a actual patch (attachment)? >>>>A copy/paste of the email piped to patch doesn't apply. >>>>(I think it loses the tab characters or something). >>> >>>Do "Save-As" and than patch! >> >>I tried that and it still fails. I even looked at the saved file and >>the email source - it contains no tabs (except in the SMTP headers). >>I think the tabs were stripped at send time. > > > OK, I got it to work with the --ignore-whitespace patch option > (except for one, which I did manually). > > Next time, please _attach_ the patch file. ...if it's not possible to preserve the tabs I might want to add. Otherwise try to attach the patch without compressing it so one can view it inline. -- MfG / Regards Friedrich Lobenstock ____________________________________________________________________ Friedrich Lobenstock Linux Services Lobenstock URL: http://www.lsl.at/ Email: fl...@fl... ____________________________________________________________________ |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-02-04 20:44:33
|
> > > Oliver, can you send me a actual patch (attachment)? > > > A copy/paste of the email piped to patch doesn't apply. > > > (I think it loses the tab characters or something). > > > > Do "Save-As" and than patch! > > I tried that and it still fails. I even looked at the saved file and > the email source - it contains no tabs (except in the SMTP headers). > I think the tabs were stripped at send time. OK, I got it to work with the --ignore-whitespace patch option (except for one, which I did manually). Next time, please _attach_ the patch file. - BS |
|
From: Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...> - 2004-02-04 20:43:58
|
Bruce Smith wrote on 04.02.2004 21:29 MET: >>>>Bruce can you take care of it? >>> >>>Oliver, can you send me a actual patch (attachment)? >>>A copy/paste of the email piped to patch doesn't apply. >>>(I think it loses the tab characters or something). >> >>Do "Save-As" and than patch! > > > I tried that and it still fails. I even looked at the saved file and > the email source - it contains no tabs (except in the SMTP headers). > I think the tabs were stripped at send time. You are right, I can also verify that. I guess Olivers Evolution is to blame which did replace all tabs. Or Oliver, did you copy-n-paste from the console to your mailprogramm? If yes try using a kde/gnome editor that also copies the tabs. -- MfG / Regards Friedrich Lobenstock ____________________________________________________________________ Friedrich Lobenstock Linux Services Lobenstock URL: http://www.lsl.at/ Email: fl...@fl... ____________________________________________________________________ |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-02-04 20:29:56
|
> >>Bruce can you take care of it? > > > > Oliver, can you send me a actual patch (attachment)? > > A copy/paste of the email piped to patch doesn't apply. > > (I think it loses the tab characters or something). > > Do "Save-As" and than patch! I tried that and it still fails. I even looked at the saved file and the email source - it contains no tabs (except in the SMTP headers). I think the tabs were stripped at send time. - BS |
|
From: Friedrich L. <fl...@fl...> - 2004-02-04 20:19:37
|
Bruce Smith wrote on 04.02.2004 19:47 MET: >>I'm out of town, > > > Back in France? ;-> > >>Bruce can you take care of it? > > > Oliver, can you send me a actual patch (attachment)? > A copy/paste of the email piped to patch doesn't apply. > (I think it loses the tab characters or something). Do "Save-As" and than patch! -- MfG / Regards Friedrich Lobenstock ____________________________________________________________________ Friedrich Lobenstock Linux Services Lobenstock URL: http://www.lsl.at/ Email: fl...@fl... ____________________________________________________________________ |
|
From: <hzu...@ra...> - 2004-02-04 19:31:47
|
On 02/04/2004 01:47:32 PM Bruce Smith wrote: >> I'm out of town, > >Back in France? ;-> Nope, actually I'm in Richmond, VA right now. ;-) Heiko |
|
From: Bruce S. <bw...@ar...> - 2004-02-04 18:47:39
|
> I'm out of town, Back in France? ;-> > Bruce can you take care of it? Oliver, can you send me a actual patch (attachment)? A copy/paste of the email piped to patch doesn't apply. (I think it loses the tab characters or something). - BS |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-02-04 18:38:31
|
I'm out of town, Bruce can you take care of it? Thx Heiko > Index: net-tools > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvsroot/devil-linux/build/scripts/net-tools,v > retrieving revision 1.13 > diff -u -r1.13 net-tools > --- net-tools 11 Jan 2004 14:43:04 -0000 1.13 > +++ net-tools 30 Jan 2004 14:53:32 -0000 > @@ -25,7 +25,10 @@ > > case $1 in > build ) > - zcat $DL_DIR/src/net-tools*.diff.gz | patch -p1 || exit 1 > + if [ ! -f net_tools_patch ]; then > + zcat $DL_DIR/src/net-tools*.diff.gz | patch -p1 || > exit 1 > + touch net_tools_patch > + fi > cp $MYDIR/config/config_net-tools.h ./config.h > cp $MYDIR/config/config_net-tools.make ./config.make > # parallel build fails - do not use $PMAKE > Index: openh323gk > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvsroot/devil-linux/build/scripts/openh323gk,v > retrieving revision 1.8 > diff -u -r1.8 openh323gk > --- openh323gk 11 Jan 2004 14:43:04 -0000 1.8 > +++ openh323gk 30 Jan 2004 14:53:32 -0000 > @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ > case $1 in > build ) > if [ "$CONFIG_OPENH323GK" = "y" ]; then > + old_kernel_includes > pushd .. > /dev/null > export PWLIBDIR=$PWD/pwlib > export OPENH323DIR=$PWD/openh323 > Index: postfix > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvsroot/devil-linux/build/scripts/postfix,v > retrieving revision 1.23 > diff -u -r1.23 postfix > --- postfix 11 Jan 2004 14:43:05 -0000 1.23 > +++ postfix 30 Jan 2004 14:53:32 -0000 > @@ -28,9 +28,13 @@ > case $1 in > build ) > if [ "$CONFIG_POSTFIX" = "y" ]; then > + make tidy > if [ "$CONFIG_POSTFIX_TLS" = "y" ]; then > - PFIXTLSPATCH=$(ls > $WORKDIR/pfixtls*/pfixtls.diff) > - patch -p1 < $PFIXTLSPATCH || exit 1 > + if [ ! -f postfix_tls_patch ]; then > + PFIXTLSPATCH=$(ls > $WORKDIR/pfixtls*/pfixtls.diff) > + patch -p1 < $PFIXTLSPATCH || exit > 1 > + touch postfix_tls_patch > + fi > make makefiles CCARGS="-DHAS_SSL" > -I/usr/include/openssl AUXLIBS="-lssl > -lcrypto" || exit 1 > fi > make $PMAKE || exit 1 > Index: unarj > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvsroot/devil-linux/build/scripts/unarj,v > retrieving revision 1.4 > diff -u -r1.4 unarj > --- unarj 11 Jan 2004 14:43:05 -0000 1.4 > +++ unarj 30 Jan 2004 14:53:32 -0000 > @@ -25,7 +25,10 @@ > case $1 in > build ) > if [ "$CONFIG_UNARJ" = "y" ]; then > - zcat $DL_DIR/src/unarj*.diff.gz | patch -p1 || > exit 1 > + if [ ! -f unarj_patch_done ]; then > + zcat $DL_DIR/src/unarj*.diff.gz | patch > -p1 || exit 1 > + touch unarj_patch_done > + fi > make $PMAKE || exit 1 > strip_debug > fi > Index: watchdog > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvsroot/devil-linux/build/scripts/watchdog,v > retrieving revision 1.14 > diff -u -r1.14 watchdog > --- watchdog 16 Jan 2004 01:47:55 -0000 1.14 > +++ watchdog 30 Jan 2004 14:53:32 -0000 > @@ -28,7 +28,10 @@ > build ) > if [ "$CONFIG_WATCHDOG" = "y" ]; then > disable_et_dyn > - bzcat $DL_DIR/src/watchdog-errno.patch.bz2 | patch > -p1 || exit 1 > + if [ ! -f watchdog_patch_done ]; then > + bzcat $DL_DIR/src/watchdog-errno.patch.bz2 > | patch -p1 || exit 1 > + touch watchdog_patch_done > + fi > add_kernel_config $MYDIR/config/config_watchdog > ./configure --prefix=/usr --localstatedir=/var > --disable-nfs --with-linelength=256|| exit 1 > make $PMAKE all || exit 1 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Devil-linux-develop mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/devil-linux-develop > > -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Heiko Z. <he...@zu...> - 2004-02-04 18:25:24
|
>> >> > I ran a complete compile (new lfssystem) yesterday >> >> > Python compiled and installed fine for me. Strange ... >> >> >> >> with kernel 2.6 ??? i'm compiling and installing it also !! really >> >> strange... >> > >> >No, 2.4. I guess you said 2.6 in the foreign stuff you wrote in the >> >original message. I don't speak or read French. ;-) >> >> You are better be carefull here ! We're not French. > > I thought that might get someone's attention. ;-> > > BTW, I never said you or Oliver were French. I never even said > that anyone wrote French in an email. (although I can see how you > might have got that implication) ;-) > > Yet the fact still remains: "I don't speak or read French." > (or anything other language, other than English) :-) > >> I'm a Kraut and don't even know what the "insult-country-name" >> is for Oliver. > > It's all Greek to me ... :-) > (let's see how many nationalities I can piss off today...) ;-) > > - BS You really deserve the BS as name. ;-) -- Regards Heiko Zuerker http://www.devil-linux.org |
|
From: Oliver J. <oli...@mo...> - 2004-02-04 18:19:35
|
On Wed, 2004-02-04 at 16:26, hzu...@ra... wrote: > On 02/04/2004 08:30:35 AM Bruce Smith wrote: > >> > > It failed again (fresh lfssystem) > >> > > It looks like the compile runs through, it then fails during make > >install. > >> > > >> > I ran a complete compile (new lfssystem) yesterday > >> > Python compiled and installed fine for me. Strange ... > >> > >> with kernel 2.6 ??? i'm compiling and installing it also !! really > >> strange... > > > >No, 2.4. I guess you said 2.6 in the foreign stuff you wrote in the > >original message. I don't speak or read French. ;-) > > You are better be carefull here ! We're not French. I'm a Kraut and don't > even know what the "insult-country-name" is for Oliver. i'm nearly kraut.. i'm liechtesteiner :-) |
35 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
