RE: [Dev-C++] Strange effect

[Ioannis V. <no...@ya...>]

If i recall correctly, you have Special Edition. Take a look at 10.2.1
on page 224. But if you notice in my examples even wrong data members
are being created!


Ioannis

* Ioannis Vranos
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.f2s.com
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys


> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev...@li...=20
> [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf=20
> Of Jason Hardman
> Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 12:10 AM
> To: Dev-C++
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] Strange effect
>=20
>=20
> Is this just your belief or can you prove that this is the=20
> case from some external referece or knowledgable party (other=20
> than yourself)?
>=20
> As I have been given to understand it the case of there only=20
> being one set of methods existing in memory for a class, and=20
> then each method being passed a hidden pointer to the object=20
> is the true case. Hence the existence of the "this" pointer=20
> for use in a class. I would also like to mention that the way=20
> you would have it is unecessarily wasteful of resources. The=20
> issue becomes more complex with virtual methods and such, but=20
> I won't go into that right now.
>=20
> I wouldn't mind if someone else who is reading this=20
> discussion, and is knowledgable about the subject, putting us=20
> both on the correct path.
>=20
> Jason.
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Ioannis Vranos" <no...@ya...>
> To: "Dev-C++" <dev...@li...>
> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2001 3:14 PM
> Subject: RE: [Dev-C++] Strange effect
>=20
>=20
> Yes, when we create an object all member functions are being=20
> (re)created for that particual object.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> >do you believe that there are only a single set of methods for every
> object of a type, and the objects only contain the data?
>=20
>=20
> No.
>=20
>=20
>=20
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-cpp-users mailing list
> Dev...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>=20