RE: [Dev-C++] Which compiler is best?(AGAIN)

[Ioannis V. <no...@ya...>]

Yes, the free compiler is command line and a mess to configure. However
i have read somewhere that borland offers a trial version of C+++
Builder for download. The IDE is not like Dev-C++ it has RAD like VB
(better than VB).
=20
=20
Ioannis
=20
* Ioannis Vranos
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.f2s.com
<http://www.noicys.f2s.com/>=20
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: dev...@li...
[mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf Of Daniel
Glenfield
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 3:12 PM
To: dev...@li...
Subject: [Dev-C++] Which compiler is best?(AGAIN)




Ok since I am having problems with writing DirectX8 applications with
DEV-C++ I am looking to buy a new compiler.

I am told Borland 5.5 is the best. Rather than spend =A380 ($130) on it =
I
decided to download Borland's 5.5 free version, which I found to be a
complete waste of time as it's so hard to get it to compile ANYTHING.

If I spend =A380 on the Borland C++ Builder 5 Standard version am I =
going
to have a load of problems, or is it just like DEV-C++ but works better?

=20

How much is VC++ anyway? How much is Borland's compiler in other
countries?

=20

Daniel



  _____ =20

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
<http://go.msn.com/bql/hmtag_itl_EN.asp>=20
_______________________________________________ Dev-cpp-users mailing
list Dev...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users=20