Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Dev-C++] about slider control
|
From: hhh h. <the...@ho...> - 2007-11-09 06:57:48
|
Hello Dev-cpp List : I've got to say... I have been a way for a while, but now that I have again free time, i came across old threads... I started to read to keep up, and read the following : Extract of an thread by Per Westermark : "Dev-C++ is dead and Code:Blocks is a very much better choice of IDE. " Per Westermark : Please, do inform me, if not us... Are you sure ?, Is Dev CPP Dead ? Won't the project be continued? I must say that is so, it sadens me, because almost every project I have worked on, (Small, Large) it was always on Dev Cpp... >From: Per Westermark <pw...@ia...> >To: seb_kramm <seb...@ya...> >CC: dev...@li... >Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] about slider control >Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:26:30 +0200 (CEST) > >There are problems trying to build MFC application susing Dev-C++, and it >doesn't matter if you call Dev-C++ an IDE or not. > >An MFC application requires MFC header files. They are not distributed >with Dev-C++. > >MFC is a c++ application framework. C++ compilers does not like to use >other C++ compilers libraries, because the layout of C++ objects, the >calling conventions, the name mangling etc are not the same. Recompiling >the MFC library with a different compiler requires the MFC source - but >that is only supplied with some Visual C++ licenses, and if you have a M$ >license that incorporates the MFC source, then the interest in using >Dev-C++ for MFC work is not too big. > >The Dev-C++ IDE could be used with the Visual C++ Express compiler, but I >don't think too many people would consider that a viable option - >especially since Visual C++ already comes with a working IDE. > >On the other hand: people shouldn't really start any new projects using >Dev-C++. Dev-C++ is dead and Code:Blocks is a very much better choice of >IDE. It does directly support a number of freely available compilers. > >/pwm > >On Fri, 26 Oct 2007, seb_kramm wrote: > > > Jessica Chen a écrit : > > > hi, thanks for your reply. > > > i agree that win32 api is not the best way. > > > but it seem i cannot use MFC in Dev-C++, so i have to use win32 api. > > > > Of course you can... I'll say it again : DevCpp IS JUST AN IDE ! > > Then, I agree it might be harder than using MS VC...But who want's to >use MFC, anyway? > > > > > i got another way to do controls in Dev-c++ -- "RAD", pls read as >follow. > > > but the problem is: it is not easy to invoke other functions in the >project. > > > WxWigets(http://www.wxwidgets.org) and RadCpp (http://www.radcpp.com). >Both > > > have slider components. > > > > If you're out on wxWidgets, you can check out > > http://wxdsgn.sourceforge.net/ > > > > > > > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > Dev-cpp-users mailing list > > Dev...@li... > > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. >Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. >Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. >Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ >_______________________________________________ >Dev-cpp-users mailing list >Dev...@li... >TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users _________________________________________________________________ Transfira JÁ a última versão do Windows Live Messenger! http://get.live.com/pt-pt/messenger/overview |
