[Dev-C++] Out of memory in function main()

[Rafael T. Jr. <raf...@ya...>]

Hello everybody, 
  
  I have a problem handling out of memory errors in C++
  
  my program is about 13,819 lines long and it wont compile it anymore because the same error appears.
  
  Fatal F1008 ogpeth.cpp 13578: Out of memory in function main()
  ***1 errors in Compile***
  
   is there anything I can do in order to avoid this kind of memory leaks?
  
  
"Alfred P. Reaud" <al...@ya...> wrote:  That's all in the calculus, and the concept of limits.
   
  In  reality, think about what the zero operation means with respect to  physics and quantum mechanics.  As long as you deal with limits,  the conventional wisdom applies.  But at 0, things reach a  boundary condition.   This is illustrated by the Dirac Delta Function
   
  First,  for edification, let's address the identity: 1/(infinity) = 0, on a  common object, an orange.  This orange, when divided, will  eventually reach a slice which can't be further divided and still give  you an orange slice.  That last slice, though of a molecular  thickness, is still the last slice.  If you divide it further,  you're not dealing with an orange anymore, rather you are dealing with  constituent atoms and molecules.  So you don't get an infinite  number of orange slices, rather you get a finite though large number of  slices.
   
  So  what happens when you actually divide by 0?  Physically, IMHO, you  do not preform the operation.  The physical operation 0 is a null  operation (as in addition and subtraction).  The logic is that if  you try to divide an orange 0 times, you actually don't divide the  orange by anything, i.e. 1/0 = 1 (with respect to physical  objects).  However, the identity 1*0 = 0 still works because as  you're not preforming the multiplication (0 is the null operator,  hence no operation), therefore the sum of additions which make a  multiplication isn't done, so the result is 0.
   
  This must be the reason why general relativity and quantum mechanics don't meet...;^)

Per Westermark <pw...@ia...> wrote:
  Why do you say that x/0 appr   oximates   to infinity?

x/0 approaches infinity if x gets closer and closer to zero from the
positive side.

It approaches -infinity if x gets closer and closer to zero from the
negative side.

Since limes x/0 -> infinity or -infinity depending on direction of
x->0, is x/0 infinity, negative infinity or something completely else -
the grand inconsistency you where thinking about :)

/Per W

On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, lordSauron wrote:

> suppose I have a nonzero number x. x==x, right? so, x/0 should be
> precisely equal to itself, no? We don't know what it is, true, since
> it approximates to infinity, however, it should be the same unless I'm
> hitting some grand inconsistency no one has yet told me about.



    Alfred P. Reaud
 



		
---------------------------------
Brings words and photos together (easily) with
 PhotoMail  - it's free and works with Yahoo! Mail.