|
From: Michal M. <mi...@mo...> - 2004-09-07 23:34:58
|
OROSZI Balázs wrote: > Hello again! > > I've read another VERY interesting post from that guy, who originally > wrote about DirectX-MinGW license problems. Now he writes about GNU C++ > library problems. He sais, that the GNU C++ library is distributed under > the GPL, and as such, derived works can only be distributed under the > GPL. So this means, that whoever wants to write commercial programs with > the GNU C++ compiler using it's C++ library MUST open it's source code? > And this would also mean, that whoever wants to write programs for Linux > (in C++ using G++), must open the source code? > > Any comments on this? If you mean libstdc++ than I don't understand why you haven't look at the official documentation: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/17_intro/license.html it's absolutely clearly explained there Regards, Michal |