Re: [Dev-C++] overloading delete

[Hossein H. <ult...@em...>]

Daniel,

> I found another
> 
> (from memory) it was:
> void* operator delete(_segment Seg, void* _based(void*) BasePtr, void* 
> Memory)
> 
> the variable names are my own, but I think the types are right. This is for 
> segments.
> 

I really do not remeber if that's mentioned in the Standard, nor am I
in the mood of finding such a fine in it (needle in a haystack).

> My problem needed a call to _ffree, but you cannot access the C runtime 
> library from another segment except the DEFAULT segment. So from your 
> segment you call your operator delete which calls your stub function (a 
> function in the DEFAULT segment) that then calls _ffree.
> 
> #include "SomeHeader.h"    // Default seg header with MyDelete()
> 
> #pragma codeseg("MYSEG_SEG")    // something like this
> 
> void operator delete (params here)
> {
>    MyDelete(params);    // Calls MyDelete which calls _ffree()
> }
> 
> void SomeFunc()
> {
>     // Create obj
>    delete obj;
> }

I'm not sure if this is Standard-compliant. It more seems to me to be
Implementation-Specific, isn't it? I rememeber reading interesting
points in Help documentations of BCB6. Maybe not a bad idea to try the
Help documentation of your own implementation.

I will return on it as I got in the mood. I will check BCB6 for you,
and if I had enough time, I will look it up in Standard as well!

Regards,
--Hossein
-- 
__________________________________________________________
Sign-up for your own FREE Personalized E-mail at Mail.com
http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup

CareerBuilder.com has over 400,000 jobs. Be smarter about your job search
http://corp.mail.com/careers