RE: [Dev-C++] Super charging the string class

[Ioannis V. <iv...@em...>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev...@li...=20
> [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf=20
> Of Michal Molhanec
> Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2003 11:16 PM
> To: dev...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] Super charging the string class
>=20
>=20
> Per Westermark wrote:
>=20
>  > Feature-wise, VC6 was old when it was released.
>=20
> but the c++ library is still better than in gcc 2 (ok in gcc=20
> 3 is superb)


From what I remember we could consider them as equal (each one =
supporting
features of the C++ standard library the other did not). However GCC 2.x =
was
better since VC++ 6 had also wrong language rules  (like the wrong scope =
of
temporary variables inside a for loop).


VC++ 2003 and GCC 3.x are great in terms of standard compliance.




Ioannis Vranos
=20
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com
* Alternative URL 1: http://run.to/noicys
* Alternative URL 2: http://www.noicys.cjb.net



>=20
> 2 David: IMHO you can use STLport or SGI's STL under VC6
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
> Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
> Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET.
> http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_06
1203_01/01
_______________________________________________
Dev-cpp-users mailing list
Dev...@li...
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www23.brinkster.com/noicys/devcpp/ub.htm
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users