RE: [Dev-C++] Single Linked List-IV

[Ioannis V. <iv...@em...>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev...@li... 
> [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf 
> Of Luigi Santillo
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 9:15 AM
> To: 'Dev-Cpp-Users'
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] Single Linked List-IV
> 
> 
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2003 at 09:38:34PM +0200, Per Westermark wrote:
> > [...]
> > 
> > I know it's a bit extra noisy with dual indirection, but 
> since the code
> > is C and not C++, slstore() can't take references to pointers.
> > 
> > /Per W
> 
> Probably, he could have avoided the double indirection using
> something like:
> 
>   struct slist
>   {
>      struct address *start;
>      struct address *last;
>   };
> 
> so that a pointer to "struct slist" would be used, still allowing
> all changes to "start" and "last" to be made.



And why use such tricks in the first place and not single pointers?






Ioannis Vranos
 
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com
* Alternative URL 1: http://run.to/noicys
* Alternative URL 2: http://www.noicys.cjb.net