RE: [Dev-C++] Single Linked List-IV

[Ioannis V. <iv...@em...>]

Ok, got it.





Ioannis Vranos
 
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com
* Alternative URL 1: http://run.to/noicys
* Alternative URL 2: http://www.noicys.cjb.net



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Per Westermark [mailto:pw...@ia...] 
> Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2003 6:39 PM
> To: Ioannis Vranos
> Cc: Dev-C++ Mailing List
> Subject: RE: [Dev-C++] Single Linked List-IV
> 
> 
> If the list is non-empty, then *last is non-NULL. In that 
> case, the OLD
> last entry should have it's next pointer pointing at the NEW 
> last entry.
> 
> It doesn't matter if the list was empty or not. After an insert - the
> insert is always at the end of the list - *last should be set 
> to point to
> the NEW last entry. Without this last line, LAST would always 
> be NULL, and
> you wouldn't get a linked list.