[Dev-C++] why do we have to rename free() ?
Open Source C & C++ IDE for Windows
Brought to you by:
claplace
|
From: Khalid El-K. <kha...@ho...> - 2003-04-03 02:57:06
|
hi fellows, when i checked a lot of big project's source codes, I have found them replacing basic funtion names with new function names, and sometimes with a new way of functioning for example: free() -> OPENSSL_free() malloc() -> gnew(type, number of blocks) how can this be useful ?, does it have a thing to do with portability ?, and if not what's the difference in functionality ? thanx in advance Regards, Khalid Al-Kary _________________________________________________________________ Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail |