[Dev-C++] Still lost trying to use 4.9.7x or 8. changed with mingw gcc 2.9x

[Roberto R. <rob...@ar...>]

  Hi all,

I did a change, using all the mingw with gcc 2.9x and core from dev-cpp 
4.9.8 and, voila ! all works well. Some in the translations paths with 
mingw ... gcc 3.2 has a problem, almost with my XP.

Regards

Subject: still lost trying to use 4.9.7x or 8.
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2003 22:13:12 -0300
From: rob...@ar...
To: 'Dev-C++ -Users-List' <dev...@li...>



Hi all, still lost trying to use 4.9.7x or 8.

Program skeleton Im use

#include 
#include 
#include 
#include 
#include 
#include 
/*#include */
/*#include */
#include 

/*using namespace std;*/

scanf,  fgets, fopen, fclose, fflush, printf ,fprintf, getch, lot of 
logic ... functions ...

mean ... no cout cin cerr ... streams, etc.
mean (almost I think) some standard c about 5000 code lines.
All of this was comfortable with devcpp 4.9.x.x and gcc 2.9xx (build in 
from bloodshed)

So, Im trying to use new devcpp 4.9.7x or 4.9.8.0 and gcc 3.x (build in 
from bloodshed)
with the same source program, without changes.

Need I use #include  or #include  namespace ... and 
so on with gcc 3.x ?

When I compiling the above source... (without iostream & cstdlib) linker 
tell me:
Compilador: Default compiler
Building Makefile: "C:\Dev-Cpp\c\Makefile.win"
Ejecutando  make clean
rm -f myprog.o  myprog.exe
gcc.exe -c myprog.C -o myprog.o -I"C:/Dev-Cpp/include"  
-I"C:/Dev-Cpp/c"  -I"c:/Dev-cpp/include/c++"  
-I"c:/Dev-Cpp/include/c++/mingw32"  
-I"C:/Dev-Cpp/include/c++/mingw32/bits" 
myprog.C: In function `int main()':
myprog.C:3161: warning: assignment to `int' from `float' (old friend 
from 4.9.6.x too, nicely)
gcc.exe myprog.o  -o "myprog.exe" -L"C:/Dev-Cpp/lib"
myprog.o(.eh_frame+0x11):myprog.C: undefined reference to 
`__gxx_personality_v0'
make.exe: *** [myprog.exe] Error 1
Ejecución Terminada

So I remember Ioannis told me some about ... and change  with 

still the same ...
not show more errors, just that. Any ideas ? Im still lost trying to use 
4.9.7x or 8.

Thanks in advance

Roberto