Re: [Dev-C++] memory allocation with STL list

[Ioannis V. <no...@ho...>]

It shouldn't remain allocated after the end of f()'s execution. If it doe=
s,
it is a compiler bug. What made you think it remains allocated?=0D
=0D
=0D
Ioannis Vranos=0D
=0D
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com=0D
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys =0D
=0D
=0D
-------Original Message-------=0D
 =0D
From: Pablo=0D
Date: =D4=E5=F4=DC=F1=F4=E7, 19 =D6=E5=E2=F1=EF=F5=DC=F1=E9=EF=F2 2003 7:=
30:30 =EC=EC=0D
To: dev...@li...=0D
Subject: [Dev-C++] memory allocation with STL list=0D
 =0D
I have a problem with the list template from the STL, illustrated in the
following simple code:=0D
 =0D
#include <iostream>=0D
#include <stdlib.h>=0D
#include <list>=0D
using namespace std;=0D
 =0D
void f()=0D
{=0D
   list<double> l;=0D
   for (int i=3D0; i<1000000;i++) l.push_back(i);=0D
}=0D
 =0D
int main()=0D
{=0D
  f();=0D
  system("PAUSE");=0D
  return 0;=0D
}=0D
 =0D
The code compiles and runs ok with Dev C++, but the problem is that the
memory used by the list remains allocated, even when the object is no lon=
ger
accessible (at the "pause" prompt). =0D
This does not happen with other STL templates (deque, vector,...) under D=
ev
C++, neither with lists under Borland compilers.=0D
Does anyone know how to address this?=0D
Thanks in advance for your help.=0D
 =0D
=20