Re: adress of member function (was RE: [Dev-C++] differnece between system pause and cin.get())

[Ioannis V. <no...@ho...>]

-------Original Message-------=0D
 =0D
From: Jaap de Wolff=0D
Date: =D4=F1=DF=F4=E7, 18 =D6=E5=E2=F1=EF=F5=DC=F1=E9=EF=F2 2003 11:07:46=
 =F0=EC=0D
To: Dev-C++ Mailing List=0D
Subject: adress of member function (was RE: [Dev-C++] differnece between
system pause and cin.get())=0D
 =0D
=0D
=0D
=3D=3D> No, no, no. Try assigning a member function to a pointer for a re=
gular=0D
function. Try to print the "address" of a member function. The standard d=
oes=0D
not restrict how member functions are implemented, only that they cannot =
be=0D
expected to be regular functions. Usually, member functions are called=0D
through an offset of an array.=0D
=0D
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D> Yes, you can assign a member function to a member functi=
on pointer=0D
The following program demonstrates it:=0D
=0D
=3D> Only that i said we cannot assign the "address" of a member function=
 to a
regular (non-member) function pointer.=0D
=0D
=3D> So basically i agree with what you said.=0D
=0D
=0D
Ioannis Vranos=0D
=0D
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com=0D
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys=20