Re: [Dev-C++] STL::Vector

[Per W. <pw...@ia...>]

Exactly, in both cases it's the programmers responsibility to know what
they are doing. But for native array you know what happens. With
containers, it's so easy to assume magic somewhere inside.

/Per W

On Tue, 28 Jan 2003, Ioannis Vranos wrote:

> -------Original Message-------
>
> From: Per Westermark
> Date: =D4=F1=DF=F4=E7, 28 =C9=E1=ED=EF=F5=DC=F1=E9=EF=F2 2003 3:01:54 =F0=
=EC
> To: Ioannis Vranos
> Cc: dev...@li...
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] STL::Vector
>
> One point about putting a 'naked' pointer into different kind of
> containers, is that the pointer doesn't have a destructor to release the
> referenced memory.
>
> /Per W
>
>
> =3D=3D> I agree with that, including built in arrays. So he must delete o=
bjects
> pointed by pointers manually. This doesn't mean anything however against
> using vectors of pointers in place of built in arrays with pointers.
>
>
> Ioannis Vranos
>
> * Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com
> * Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys