Re: [Dev-C++] templates in C++ : precisions

[Ioannis V. <no...@ho...>]

This is non-sense (at least). Did you correct B() as i suggested?=0D
=0D
 =0D
Ioannis Vranos=0D
=0D
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.freeurl.com=0D
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys =0D
-------Original Message-------=0D
 =0D
From: erwan ancel=0D
Date: =CA=F5=F1=E9=E1=EA=DE, 12 =C9=E1=ED=EF=F5=DC=F1=E9=EF=F2 2003 5:04:=
32 =EC=EC=0D
To: Dev-C++ Mailing List=0D
Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] templates in C++ : precisions=0D
 =0D
>>The typename has exactly the same effect. They are both equivalents for
the definition of template arguments.=0D
 =0D
With gcc, they don't. I did some testing: typename compiles, and class do=
esn
t. Perhaps gcc tries to compile something more when it knows the template
parameter is a class...=0D
 =0D
 =0D
 =0D
 =0D
=20