RE: [Dev-C++] compiler psychiatrics

[Ioannis V. <no...@ho...>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev...@li...=20
> [mailto:dev...@li...] On Behalf=20
> Of Carlos Garc=EDa del Monte
> Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 2:25 PM
> To: dev-cpp-users-list
> Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] compiler psychiatrics
>=20
>=20
> The two bad comments were not in the original, I added them in the
> message. The // was an explanation for you about where the=20
> fail was, and
> since I write almost everything in C++ now I use //always. If so the
> compiler would have say errors errors errors!!! and bad comment. The
> other that interrupts is either added in the message (sorry,=20
> I had to be
> more carefully, although being in a message, it was for be=20
> compiled, so
> I had to notice they would give you errors if you try).
> Yeah! Those damned \n. I forgot that this experiment was the=20
> last before
> abandoning that custom of \n in scanfs (it was my second experiment
> while learning programming) and that I deleted the correction and left
> the original with \n (I did not reached to try the correction which
> works fine). And so I was not observant of that error, when I=20
> saw a \n I
> thought "printf"... and went on.
> Without it it works fine.
> All the other strange behavior (or possible strange, of course) are
> corrected and I don't have any of them at hand.


Great! As you see it was not a compiler's issue.


Ioannis

* Ioannis Vranos
* Programming pages: http://www.noicys.cjb.net
* Alternative URL: http://run.to/noicys