Re: [Dev-C++] compiler psychiatrics

[Carlos d. M. <cg...@wo...>]

The two bad comments were not in the original, I added them in the
message. The // was an explanation for you about where the fail was, and
since I write almost everything in C++ now I use //always. If so the
compiler would have say errors errors errors!!! and bad comment. The
other that interrupts is either added in the message (sorry, I had to be
more carefully, although being in a message, it was for be compiled, so
I had to notice they would give you errors if you try).
Yeah! Those damned \n. I forgot that this experiment was the last before
abandoning that custom of \n in scanfs (it was my second experiment
while learning programming) and that I deleted the correction and left
the original with \n (I did not reached to try the correction which
works fine). And so I was not observant of that error, when I saw a \n I
thought "printf"... and went on.
Without it it works fine.
All the other strange behavior (or possible strange, of course) are
corrected and I don't have any of them at hand.