|
From: Brian P. <br...@su...> - 2002-05-16 14:22:27
|
In the end the whole issue boils down to this: It is (and has always been) considered in poor taste to use HTML formating when posting to discussion forums using email. There rarely are ever any written rules to this effect; it has just always been understood. Call it common net-icate. The reasons, the main reasons, people don't want HTML in the emails are two (one stated already): bandwidth and, believe it or not, there are still people using email clients that don't translate HTML coding. So, the word is, be nice and use text-only mode when posting. That's all. No law, no punishment (usually), just be considerate. I really like Dev-C++! (Sorry, I felt that I must say something about the program since that is what this list is for :-) b-- On Thu, 2002-05-16 at 06:43, Santiago Palmier Campos wrote: > Well... I don't want to start a flame-war right now but... > > We can 'take a look to your arguments' also: > > 1 - Information can be send without HTML formatting, and yes, it will be > fully understandable! Just think about C/C++ code, it's written in plain > text and you do not need 'extra formatting' to understand it ;o) > > 2 - While talking about text/document formatting we can say it is like text > editting for coding: you can use graphical IDEs (like Dev-C++ / KDevelop) or > you can use console programs (like aedit / vi). Should I stop using 'vi' > because there is 'emacs'? > > 3 - You're NOT sending e-mails to your friends, you're posting/requesting > information on a mailing list.. I think it is a little bit different ;o) > > 4 - Indentation, word-wrapping, '>' chars... If you do not care about how > your text/document looks like, your mail program / editor will not do that > job for you =8-O > > 5 - 'Plain text vs HTML mail war' is quite similar to 'text editors vs text > processors': Will you use M$ Word, WordPerfect or so to write a simple text? > So 'Plain TEXT vs HTML mail war' is not to be solved by 'change your email > client: it's your problem!' ;o) > We are talking about what is needed: HTML is not needed here, I know it is > fine and funny (web browsing is good and the web is really full of info), > but it is not necessary in a mailing list... Even more, it can become > annoying in certain cases!!! > > BTW: Talking about virusses and so on... Do you really think that 'Melissa > and its friends' will ask the user for confirmation on their actions? > > Just my 2 cents! > Santy > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Wilson [mailto:bo...@ph...] > Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2002 5:22 AM > To: Dev-C++ User Mailing List > Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] gotoxy > > > > > > Here's my list of arguments: > > > > 1) You're only sending an email here. Markups are completely > redundant. > > > > All this HTML only waste space and bandwidth. > > > > > > > > 2) HTML mail with hardcoded fontnames look horrible in my Linux > > > > emailclient. > > > > > > > > 3) HTML mail can contain script viruses. > > > > > > > > 4) HTML mail mess up the archives. When you try to see a message in > the > > > > archive, you see all the HTML code instead of the email! > > Well, that all depends! What follows is better than what is above. > Here's my list of arguments: > You're only sending an email here. Markups are completely redundant. All > this HTML only waste space and bandwidth. > HTML mail with hardcoded fontnames look horrible in my Linux emailclient. > HTML mail can contain script viruses. > HTML mail mess up the archives. When you try to see a message in the > archive, you see all the HTML code instead of the email! > > Let's look at your arguments one-by-one: > Yes, I am sending an email, the purpose of which is to transmit information. > Understanding is enhanced with good formatting which is allowed with > automated html email programs such as Outlook or Outlook Express. The > multiple ">" which appear in non html forwarded emails can not only inhibit > comprehension, but also the inability of such an email does not have any > word wrap which combined with the ">" can make the whole message damn near > unintelligible. > This is the real problem, your environment or at least your email program. > It is certainly true that I or anyone else can build an html file which will > do nasty things, but the programs that generate html enabled emails > (Outlook, Outlook Express) will not activate a virus without the active > involvement of the person who receives the email. > Again it is your environment that is the problem. > Regards, > > Bob > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely > for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. No confidentiality > or privilege is waived or lost by any wrong transmission. > If you have received this message in error, please immediately destroy it and kindly > notify the sender by reply email. > You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose, distribute, print, or copy any > part of this message if you are not the intended recipient. Opinions, conclusions and > other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of > Ydilo Advanced Voice Solutions, S.A. shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > _______________________________________________________________ > > Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply > the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: ban...@so... > _______________________________________________ > Dev-cpp-users mailing list > Dev...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users > |