Re: [Dev-C++] difference between char* argv[] and char *argv[]
Open Source C & C++ IDE for Windows
Brought to you by:
claplace
|
From: Daniel G. <sp...@ho...> - 2002-04-08 06:29:51
|
I think argv[][] would be a two dimensional array, n'est pas? Thanks for the information on the whole char* thing, I think I'll go for the *var type but we'll see (new job today so I guess I'll do what I'm told). Best regards, Daniel >From: "Jason Hardman" <jas...@bt...> >To: "Dev-C++" <dev...@li...>, "Daniel Glenfield" ><sp...@ho...> >Subject: Re: [Dev-C++] difference between char* argv[] and char *argv[] >Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2002 00:17:04 +0100 > >I know you've been told they are the same by now, which is right, but I >though I'd add the why of >the two forms. > >There is an argument about which is better between some programmers. Some >say that "char* variable;" >is best because the pointer symbol is visibly linked to the char type, so >it's clear that you are >declaring a character pointer (a pointer to a character) and not just a >character. The others say >that this is misleading as if you write: > >char* var1, var2; > >it looks like both var1 and var2 are pointers, where as in fact var1 is a >character pointer and var2 >is just a character, so they say use the second method: > >char *var1, *var2; // two pointers > >In the end it's a matter of style, both are valid and you can even write >(AFAIK): > >char * var1; // just to confuse you! > >There are other arguments, but I don't bother with any of it and just use >what I want. > >Even more confusing (<evil laugh>) is that you can write *argv[], or **argv >and they are >interchangeable. I'm not sure about argv[][] though - probably invalid. > >My two cents, Jason. > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Daniel Glenfield" <sp...@ho...> >To: <dev...@li...> >Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2002 12:07 PM >Subject: [Dev-C++] difference between char* argv[] and char *argv[] > > >Hi all, >what's the difference between char* argv[] and char *argv[] ? imilarly, >char* abc and char *abc ? Are they the SAME because the compiler ignores >whitespace? > >Daniel > > > >_________________________________________________________________ >Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com > > >_______________________________________________ >Dev-cpp-users mailing list >Dev...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users > _________________________________________________________________ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com |