|
From: Devin C. <dcc...@ya...> - 2002-02-18 14:27:28
|
> This is broken compiler. Did it happen with MINGW32?
Yes. But then again I've also had the compiler telling me there are
undefined escape sequences in the middle of comments. (That one
went away after a reboot.)
> Although i did not see any code, value wrapping may had occured.
>
> E.g.
>
> for(int i=0; i<Vec.size(); i++)
> { ...}
Not likely; the largest vector I'm dealing with should have sixty-four
elements. (This one had eight.)
> > something funny going on. (push_back() refusing to work was
> > one of them.)
>
> This is broken implementation issue.
I've gotten the compiler to act in weird ways more than once. If
others aren't having similar problems, then I suspect my system is
possessed. (Dev-C++ won't work on my other machine, a Win95
486; everything it compiles crashes.)
> I am working using standard containers all the time and never
> encountered any problem (except that MING doesn't support vector::at()
> ).
For me, every day is a fight against whatever new and interesting
perversity the language, compiler or IDE will throw at me. :) Most of the
time it's just my inadequate command of the language; I'm learning C++
using a technique known colloquially as 'the Hard Way.'
--Devin Carless
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
|