RE: Luigi - Re: [Dev-C++] Re: Execution Error !?

[Green, A. <JA...@GA...>]

the standard was passed back in 1998.  About 4 years ago.  

> ----------
> From: 	Daniel Glenfield[SMTP:sp...@ho...]
> Sent: 	Saturday, January 12, 2002 7:55 AM
> To: 	bla...@i-...; dev...@li...
> Subject: 	Re: Luigi - Re: [Dev-C++] Re: Execution Error !?
> 
> How old is <iostream.h> way of doing it then? is this <iostream> way brand new or been aroun dfor a year, or what?
> 
> 
> 
> >From: Krystian G Bates 
> >To: "Daniel Glenfield" ,gi...@li..., dev...@li... 
> >Subject: Re: Luigi - Re: [Dev-C++] Re: Execution Error !? 
> >Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2002 08:51:56 -0500 
> > 
> >At 08:11 AM 1/12/2002 +0000, Daniel Glenfield wrote: 
> > 
> >>#include is OLD???? How long has it been considered 
> >>old? I 
> >>did an expensive course, finished in September, and it used 
> >>#include 
> >> all the time. You say it's not ANSI C++ ??? 
> >> 
> >>Help me out here would you? 
> > 
> >The ANSI/ISO C++ format for headers have no extensions... i.e. 
> >#include 
> > instead of #include . That being said, most 
> >every 
> >standard library includes both versions for backwards compatibility. 
> > 
> 
>   _____  
> 
> Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: Click Here
> 
> _______________________________________________ Dev-cpp-users mailing list Dev...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dev-cpp-users
>