It would be great if the graph that depot output contained "subgraph
cluster_*" for each group of libraries that with the same directory as
these often form packages and grouping them like this can really help
with visualisation. (when run through dot, as neato does not support
clusters.)
The graph produced by running this through dot better helps to
visualise both library and component dependancies.
Would it be possible to add this to depdot?
Cheers,
Nick
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Hello Nick, many thanks for your feedback. I shall consider it.
Apologies for not getting to this earlier. I don't make many updates to depdot these days so I have only just picked up your message.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
It would be great if the graph that depot output contained "subgraph
cluster_*" for each group of libraries that with the same directory as
these often form packages and grouping them like this can really help
with visualisation. (when run through dot, as neato does not support
clusters.)
I often have a directory structure like this:
and I run this through depdot like this:
Which produces output like:
but it would nice if the output was more like:
The graph produced by running this through dot better helps to
visualise both library and component dependancies.
Would it be possible to add this to depdot?
Cheers,
Nick
Hello Nick, many thanks for your feedback. I shall consider it.
Apologies for not getting to this earlier. I don't make many updates to depdot these days so I have only just picked up your message.