From: <rem...@en...> - 2006-07-28 22:11:21
|
"Denis Jacquerye" <mo...@gm...> writes: > Revision 1026 > - Modified U+222B-222D, U+2A0C-2A0E to match Sans Serif style. > - Added U+222E-2233, U+2A00-2A02, U+2A0F-2A1C to Sans. > > Could we discuss replacing original Bitstream Vera glyphs (here > U+222B) beforehand. Some people might disagree with the changes so > it's better if we talk and hear different point of views. Oh sorry, I thought it was a glyph copied from Vera Serif. I am restoring U+222B, I'll leave the others for the moment (I have modified the references position in U+222C, U+222D, U+2A0C) for a comparison, and I'll copy the Serif-looking glyphs I replaced in Serif, because it seems they are not there yet. I'll be away for holidays, so I think I won't be able to take part in the early discussions. I'll be back around the 11th of August, I think it'll be before the 2.9 release. Regards, --=20 R=E9my Oudompheng |