From: Stepan R. <st...@sr...> - 2006-02-27 19:08:30
|
Hi. On Sat, 25 Feb 2006, Keenan Pepper wrote: > On 2/25/06, M=E9d=E9ric Boquien <med...@la...> wrote: >> Well, apparently this was due to a differing version of fontforge. Using= the >> fontforge snapshot from january, the diff is normal. Perhaps we should b= ump >> the recommended version to avoid this kind of problem? > > That flag (256) means that point should never be interpolated, because > it's used in instructions. Older versions never interpolate any points > if the glyph has instructions, so the flag is only for efficiency's > sake. I say we wait until there is a stable, released version of > fonrforge with the flag, then bump the version. In the meantime, we > should change sfdnormalize.sh to unset the flag (bitwise AND it with > the complement of 0x100). Done. Mederic, can you recreate the patch against current SVN? Thank you. Have a nice day. Stepan Roh |