Re: [Ddclient-support] Fwd: use=web, reliable?
Brought to you by:
supersandro2000,
wimpunk
From: wimpunk <wi...@us...> - 2014-09-06 10:45:31
|
On 09/06/14 01:02, Alexander CSpa wrote: > Dear all, Dear Wimpunk, > 2014-09-02 7:52 GMT+02:00, wimpunk <wi...@us...>: >> Hi Alex, >> >> First you should subscripe to the list if you want to see the answers on >> your question. I had to add you message manually to the list. >> > Thank you! Did it. > >> On 08/27/14 23:20, Alexander CSpa wrote: >>> Hello to all, >>> Hello Wimpunk, >>> I would like to ask how reliable the option "use=web" is. >>> >>> I am asking you this because I only found two sites wich >>> display the current ip adress of the cient. >>> >>> So if myip.dnsdynamic.org and ip.changeip.com are down (it >>> could happen) and there is no local method for viewing the ip... ddclient >>> cannot update himself! >> >> I used to use checkip.dyndns.org which resolves in multiple addresses. >> It makes the system more reliable although ddclient does not retry if >> can't reach it. He just retries the next time. >> > > Actually you answered my question. :-) > Good to know. :-) > But i would like to ask if it would be possible to use a list of web > services > (Something in the conf. like: use=web, web=site1, site2 and it tries > the first and if it does not work the second and so on.Alternative: > if=web, web=site1 if=web, web=site2) > If someone want to implement it and sends me a patch, I will probably add it to ddclient but currently I don't feel the need for such change so I will not write it myself. > This is important if someone is looking at trying to have "always" a > client connected. I still believe it's better to use your modem to get the IP address of your WAN connection. You can check it as fast as the firmware allows. > > Maybe that an improper solution would be to duplicate the conf. file > in the same file and to add two different web=... . > You can try but I don't think ddclient will be very happy to see that. At least it will result in a duplicate update. > > Thank You again! > |