Re: [dcplusplus-devel] boost vs tr1

[Jacek S. <arn...@gm...>]

Did you ever check if it was indeed the boost version / include order? I'll be reverting your patch
soon unless you have further comments...

/J

Steven Sheehy wrote:
> Jacek,
> 
> With std::tr1 namespace, it did not compile on g++ 4.3.2 and libstdc++ 4.3.2. It
> was unable to find shared_ptr in tr1, so I switched it to boost. I guess on my
> system it doesn't use the boost one as a fallback like you mention.
> 
> -Steven
> 
> Jacek Sieka wrote:
>> Hey Steven,
>> I noticed you changed from tr1 to boost shared_ptr, what's wrong with the one from tr1 (which is
>> drawn from boost if it's missing from the compiler)?
>>
>> /J
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
>> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
>> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
>> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
>> _______________________________________________
>> dcplusplus-devel mailing list
>> dcp...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dcplusplus-devel
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
> _______________________________________________
> dcplusplus-devel mailing list
> dcp...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dcplusplus-devel
>